(BBC) Labour suffers big council losses
Labour suffers big council lossesGordon Brown says he will 'listen and lead'
Gordon Brown says it has been a "bad and disappointing" election for Labour, as the party suffers its worst council results in at least 40 years. BBC research suggests Labour won 24% of votes cast in England and Wales, behind the Tories on 44% and Lib Dems on 25%. So far Labour has lost 289 councillors and key councils like Reading. Tory gains include Bury and North Tyneside. Mr Brown insists his party will learn lessons. David Cameron called it a "big moment" for the Conservative Party.
General secretary 'quits'
The margin is similar to the drubbing received by Tory Prime Minister John Major in council elections in 1995, two years before he was ejected from Downing Street by Tony Blair. Attention is set to turn later on Friday to the race to be London mayor, where Conservative Boris Johnson is seeking to defeat Labour's Ken Livingstone.
Counting of the 2.4m votes began at 0830 BST with a result due at 2000 BST at the earliest. With about a quarter of the votes counted Mr Johnson was understood to be ahead in 9 out of 14 areas.
But as election fever gripped Westminster, Labour had further bad news as the party's newly appointed general secretary, David Pitt-Watson - a City fund manager - decided not to take up the position.
Mr Pitt-Watson, believed to have been Mr Brown's choice, was appointed after Peter Watt resigned over the row about donations from businessman David Abrahams. And senior Labour backbencher Ian Gibson said Mr Brown had six months - up to the party conference - to move the party forward or risk losing the next general election.
In the local elections - where results continue to come in - the Tories have had a 4% higher share of the national vote than in last year's local polls.
Such a share in a general election would have the potential to give the party a Commons majority of 138.
Mr Brown told reporters: "It's clear to me that this has been a disappointing night, indeed a bad night for Labour."
He conceded that the government had "lessons to learn", but insisted: "My job is to listen and to lead."
The test of leadership is not what happens in a period of success but what happens in difficult circumstances
He blamed "difficult economic circumstances" for much of the bad performance, and claimed that measures taken by the government to counter problems would become clear "over the next few months".
"I think people want to be assured, and indeed people are questioning and want to be assured, that the government will steer them through these difficult times."
He added: "The test of leadership is not what happens in a period of success but what happens in difficult circumstances."
Mr Cameron said: "This is a very big moment for the Conservative Party - but I don't want anyone to think that we would deserve to win an election on the back of a failing government.
"I want us to really prove to people that we can make the changes that they want to see, in terms of schools and hospitals and crime and the other issues that really matter to all of us.
"That's what I'm going to devote myself and my party to over the next few months."
'No crisis'
The Tories have gained control of several councils including Southampton, Bury, Harlow, Maidstone and North Tyneside.
BBC analysis suggests Labour's vote appears to have fallen most heavily in its traditional heartlands - suggesting MPs were right to fear the 10p tax row had damaged their core support.
In Wales, Labour lost control of five councils and could also be out of office in another.
Labour was defeated in its south Wales valley heartland areas of Merthyr Tydfil, Blaenau Gwent, Torfaen and Caerphilly. It also lost Flintshire.
Ministers were trying to put a brave face on the results and pledging to listen to voters' concerns.
Deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the results had been "very disappointing indeed", but said the elections had taken place against a background of rising economic concerns.
"We didn't respond early enough to those groups of people who were going to lose out as a result of the change in the 10p rate which overall benefits lower income people but there were some people who lost out and we didn't react early enough," she said.
Labour's chief whip Geoff Hoon said: "There's no crisis. This isn't something that's going to affect the fundamental stability of the government."
Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg told BBC Breakfast: "We were 13% a few months ago, we're now 25%. We've over-taken Labour, we've taken seats off the Conservatives, we've taken seats off Labour.
"If you call that a disappointment then we inhabit different planets. I am actually delighted, we are regaining momentum."
London contest
More than 4,000 seats on 159 councils were up for grabs in Thursday's elections, as well as the London mayoralty and assembly.
All seats are up for election in the 22 Welsh unitary authorities.
Of 1,005 people who took part in the poll, 68% said Mr Cameron was an asset to his party, compared with 43% for Mr Clegg and 42% for Mr Brown.
Mr Brown's reputation for economic competence has also taken a blow.
At this time last year 48% said that Labour could be trusted to run the country's economy, little different from the 53% who did so in 2002. But this year the figure has fallen to 32%.
However, only 36% said they trust the Conservatives to run the economy - 10 points down on last year, and little better than the figure of 32% recorded for the party in 2002.
Labels: ELECTIONS, GORDON BROWN
posted by MrK @ 3:36 PM
1 Comments:
Gordon Brown is having problems of his own, and Brown is blaming the economy. However, 'we all know' that 'these are just excuses' and Gordon Brown 'must learn' the hard way.
In all seriousness, it seems that the same dour style that made him so unyielding and ego driven on Zimbabwe doesn't go over well with the British voters either.
As I don't want to see the Conservatives resurgent, I would suggest Labour engage in some 'regime change' of it's own, and replace their leader with someone with a little more charisma.
And a more deft touch on the issue of Zimbabwe. Which should really be a non-issue, as far as the UK is concerned.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home