(TALKZIMBABWE) Zimbabwe sanctions no longer a hidden issue – RBZ official
Zimbabwe sanctions no longer a hidden issue – RBZ officialSamantha Chidzero in New York
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:42:00 +0000
THE recent elections in Zimbabwe have exposed the extent of the sanctions regime that the Zimbabwe government has been talking about all these years, said a senior Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe official who spoke to the Zimbabwe Guardian on condition of anonymity.
“The government has been telling people that the sanctions crippling Zimbabwe are not only targeted at individuals, but the whole country,” said the official adding that the recent elections had exposed the ‘evil nature’ of Western governments who claim to be concerned about ordinary Zimbabweans, but are encouraging their companies to withdraw from the country.
“These countries bully African governments into adopting their own policies and when they don’t this is what you get. If TESCO withdraws from Zimbabwe it hurts the ordinary person, who is supposed to be helped by these sanctions.”
The official also pointed out that Zimbabwe’s ‘goodwill’ had been damaged on the international scene and many companies were reluctant to do business with the country.
He also pointed out that the tourism industry, one of Zimbabwe’s highest foreign currency earners had been hard-hit by the negative perception encouraged by Britain and the U.S.
“The tourism sector has suffered the most as many travel alerts have been issued by these countries. Zimbabwe remains a safe destination and the travel alerts issued have nothing to do with conditions on the ground,” said our source.
“We hear of accidents everywhere where the Brits travel to, but never Zimbabwe. Zimbabwean people are welcoming and very friendly and the country has a lot more to offer than most countries ion the region.”
The source also attacked Western governments for threatening to impose sanctions on British companies with interests in Zimbabwe. He asked: “Are these targeted sanctions as well? Barclays Bank’s withdrawal from Zimbabwe will hurt thousands of account holders who have accounts with the bank. How about all those businesses that secured loans from that bank and people who had private investments and shares?”
“The West should just come out in the open and say what exactly they are trying to do and not hide under the banner of targeted sanctions,” our source concluded.
Zimbabwe has been under sanctions from U.S. and the European Union. Although they have often been referred to as targeted sanctions on government officials, they have also included freezing of balance of payments support for Zimbabwe and withdrawal of donor money.
The most conspicuous withdrawal was by the Danish Development Agency which used to fund agriculture (to the tune of US$13,9 million); transport (US$48 million); health (US29,7 million) a year. This has all dried up. The Swedish government used to fund education (to the tune of US$13,9 million), and roads and infrastructure development (US$15,1 million) a year.
Labels: COLOUR REVOLUTIONS, NEOCOLONIALISM, SANCTIONS, ZIMBABWE
posted by MrK @ 11:30 PM
1 Comments:
This goes to show that African economies can never develop if they depend on foreign companies. Foreign companies are an even greater liability to sovereignty than the presence of a small number of farmers on so much of Zimbabwe and Africa's land. The truth is that Africa can only be independent and strong when all of it's economy is in African hands. And when it is shared equally by the majority of the population on a non- (post?) racial basis, without the existence of elites, economic or political.
Otherwise, there will always be the threat of foreign invasion and intervention, and the threat of withdrawal of significant parts of the economy. Politicians will always live in fear of 'scaring away investors'.
The neoliberal freemarketeers who are in government are falling all over themselves to attract more foreign companies and money, as if African money and companies are somehow not good enough, let alone better than.
The truth is that there are no shortcuts to development, and handing over huge chunks of our national resources to foreign business certainly isn't one of them. The cries of 'they will bring jobs' should be answered by - they will bring slave labour. The excuse of 'they will bring development' must be answered with - they will take everything and leave behind nothing. Because that is what has happened under 'free trade'.
We must have an initiative that puts African trade, commerce and business first, and develops our economies in a way that gives the ordinary citizen a stake in that economy. We must create economies that are 90% or more middle class, where everyone owns something - a house, a piece of land, a car or has a skilled job.
It is the only way forward.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home