Thursday, September 12, 2013

(HERALD ZW) Baba Jukwa, Edward Snowden, WikiLeaks
July 14, 2013 SuperAdmin Mai Jukwa

A FEW months ago, I wrote on Deborah and Bruce, the British and American ambassadors. It was my charge that they were shameless hypocrites; not of conscious or deliberate effort but by an involuntary and subconscious superiority complex that has permeated their collective white psyche over a number of centuries.

They have an odious sense of entitlement, poking their noses into the affairs of others and doing this with a troubling self-righteous air though their own compound is filthy beyond compare.

They are a law unto themselves

I used to believe the Western world was deliberately objectionable — that they chose to be unjust.

I have since entered a different regime of thought. The contradictions of the Western world are so obvious, so egregious, as to be obvious to even the offender. At least one would think so. Quite clearly this is not the case.

The West does not think itself unjust; if anything it sincerely believes itself to be the salt of the earth.

I now have no doubt in my mind that the British and American ambassadors believe their own nonsense about regime change efforts being motivated by a desire to further human rights and democracy.

Instead of seeing themselves for the gratuitous racists, slave drivers, colonisers, segregationists, Iraq invaders, sanction mongers and greedy capitalists that they are, the British (and their white imperial comrades) see themselves as paragons of virtue.

Not only so, they are puzzled when their acts of global “generosity” are rejected by Africans, Asians and Latin Americans.
The white world sees nothing unjust in Australia or New Zealand.

They were welcomed by the indigenous peoples of those lands and rewarded this generosity with subjugation.

Today Australia and New Zealand are living examples of the wickedness of unchecked white imagination.

They take, take, and continue to take.

Their own lands are not enough for them.

Baba Jukwa and WikiLeaks

Baba Jukwa claims that he is a member of Mugabe’s inner circle.
He is not.

However, let us assume that he is and that all he said thus far was indeed true. Let us assume that Baba Jukwa is indeed leaking State secrets. The contradictions are obvious.

Consider how PayPal, an American online payments processing engine, and VISA, all came together and pulled the plug on WikiLeaks’ funding when Julius Assange began releasing American diplomatic cables and the War Logs.

It was alleged that by exposing American soldiers shooting innocent civilians from a helicopter gunship that Julian Assange was compromising American national security.

Today Assange is holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London; his co-conspirator has not been equally lucky and is languishing in an American military facility.

Consider how Facebook seems to very much support the posting of pictures of individuals, their names and phone numbers, together with the encouragement to “phone them and give them no rest” (harassment) as not being in violation of their terms of service.

Would Facebook hold the same position if an anonymous profile began posting the phone numbers of David Cameron’s children and threatening to kidnap them as Baba Jukwa has done to Kasukuwere?

The page would be shut down in minutes.

It is not only that they have offered tacit approval; they have actively encouraged Baba Jukwa.

The Economist and even the BBC carried adoring articles on Baba Jukwa.
It is inconceivable that these organisations would lend support to a page that calls for the abduction of children.

The cunning whites will hurry to say that Mugabe is, in their view, a dictator so the rules that apply for him do not apply to them.
I hate to put things in such prosaic terms but this is precisely how white people think.

It is for this reason that the Americans do not hesitate to drop a bomb to target an alleged insurgent even if he is in bed with his wife and children.

Imagine the outrage if the Russians — pursuing a Chechen rebel — sent in a missile into Manhattan and killed 20 Americans and defended their action by arguing that they had sought the cooperation of the Americans in bringing the rebel to justice but had received no assistance and thus felt compelled to “eliminate” him by any means necessary.

This seems inconceivable because it is grossly unjust but it is happening in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The white world feels that its blood is more precious than the blood of other non-white nationalities.

This is why the West wails itself sore over Sandy Hook, where a mere two dozen kids were killed, but speaks very casually about Iraq where it’s soldiers and the sectarian militia it formed butchered hundreds of thousands.

All this is born of an inherent sense of supremacy that is characteristic of white society. It is not so much born of race but culture.

Mainstream political rhetoric in America unabashedly refers to “safeguarding American interests.”

In their view if a dictator (read Saudi Arabia and Bahrain) serve American oil interests then he is to be supported and supplied with fighter jets.

This sick state of mind is pervasive within the Western world.

Bolivia’s ‘cheap’ President and Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden exposes the depth of Western supremacist thought.
On discovering that the Americans were spying on them, the French and Germans were dismayed.

Allies should not spy on each other, they complained.
Notice that their objection is not to spying against the rest of the world.

Their view is clearly that the Americans can violate the rest of the non-white world with total impunity as long as they do not spy on their fellow “civilised” Europeans.

If it was the case that the Americans had been spying on Bolivia, Nigeria or India then that would have been perfectly acceptable even in view of the fact that none of these nations is at war with America or has expressed any aggressions against it.

But notice that this, the French and Germans are not complaining about spying in general, what has upset them is that they have been put in the same category as niggers for whom they would have expected such activity to be targeted against.

Again the duplicity is obvious to anyone who is not white but the Europeans themselves are entirely oblivious.
One could describe it as intellectual blind spot.

It is blind spot that allows Western ambassadors to jump up and down in synthetic rage at what they call abuses by Mugabe yet their Queen dines with the Saudi despot in whose country women are second class citizens and thieves have feet cut off for having stolen motorbikes. They are oblivious to the violence of their contradiction.

The forced landing of the Bolivian presidential jet outraged Latin America, rightly so.

It is inconceivable that the very nations that routinely scream themselves hoarse over the rule of law would have so flagrantly violated established conventions.

But the message from Europe was clear: you are not one of us and we do not consider your presidency as being of equal weight with that of a European leader.

This is what the Europeans communicated when they forced the Bolivian jet to the ground.
Zero respect.

Their talk of equality is empty and those who take it seriously are to be pitied.

China is hacking us

The Snowden saga exposes the duplicitous nature of Westerners.
Over the past six months the Americans wasted no time to tell the world how nasty the Chinese were.

They were hacking into American computers and the civilised Americans found this unacceptable.
The Chinese had to be put in their place.

This is how cunning and manipulative these people are.
Though they knew that they were actually hacking the Chinese at a greater scale they still thought it right to dishonestly present themselves as an angel of light.

It is the height of deception, but one must not consider this conduct to be out of character.
This is just how they operate.

They manipulate and they deceive.
I view Westerners in quite ungenerous terms.

Their history is littered with slavery, colonialism, and war mongering. It struck me the other day that the only nations that ever talk about sanctioning any other nation on earth are white.

No other race is interested in sanctioning anyone.
It is just the whites. They must ask themselves why this is so.

Ndini muchembere wenyu Amai Jukwa

Labels: , , , ,


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home