Wednesday, March 07, 2012

Barotse report cites government interference in WP traditional affairs

COMMENT - Has anyone seen the map of the Barotseland Agreement? It includes parts of other countries, and strays well beyond Western Province. :)

Barotse report cites government interference in WP traditional affairs
By Mwala Kalaluka
Wed 07 Mar. 2012, 12:00 CAT

MISUNDERSTANDINGS between Nkoya chief Mutondo and the Barotse Royal Establishment are largely a reflection of government interference in customs and traditions of the people of Western Province, according to the Dr Rodger Chongwe commission of inquiry. But a Lusaka legal practitioner says the commission's recommendations are not only a disgrace but an affront to the spirit of national unity.

In its summary of conclusions and recommendations accessed by The Post, which are contained in chapter four of its report presented to President Michael Sata recently, the commission also concluded that there was lack of dialogue between the BRE and Mwene Mutondo.

The commission of inquiry notes that the misunderstandings that exist between the BRE and some tribes within the province could be resolved amicably between the royal establishment and the other parties, especially after the restoration of the Barotseland Agreement 1964.

The commission found that the frosty relationship between the BRE and the government stems from the abrogation of the Barotseland Agreement in 1969 and subsequent actions by successive governments not to engage in meaningful dialogue with the BRE.

"Further, the events of 14th January 2011 have worsened the relationship thus creating a lot of mistrust and resentment of central government among the people of Western Province," the report reads.

"This is not conducive to the promotion of good and democratic governance in the country."

The commission concluded that efforts by the current government, such as the appointment of a commission of inquiry into the Mongu riots and the engagement of the BRE and the people of Western Province to resolve the Barotseland Agreement restoration impasse were progressive.

The commission urged the government and the BRE to establish clear rules of engagement on the restoration of the Agreement.

The commission recommended that after the restoration of the Barotseland Agreement, government and the BRE should negotiate all contentious issues that may impinge the smooth implementation of the Agreement.

"The people of Western Province have a legitimate cause to demand self-governance and for a fair distribution of the national resources," the report reads in part.

"Although the demand for self-governance by the majority of the petitioners may be genuine given the extent of deprivation and frustrations experienced...there is room for constructive dialogue and corrective action to be taken as opposed to the province seceding from the rest of the country."

The commission further recommended that the Barotseland Agreement should be considered for inclusion in the ongoing Constitution review process as a matter of national concern.

But Lusaka lawyer Chimbeka Sakala says he agrees with PF Secretary
General Wynter Kabimba that it was an oversight on the part of President Sata to have given the chairmanship of the commission of inquiry to Dr Chongwe.

"In fact he should not have even sat on the commission," Chimbeka stated in a press release. "The recommendations of the commission are
not just a disgrace but an affront to the spirit of unity that the President has, since assuming office, endeavoured to foster."

Chimbeka said the 'public' expected a reasoned report that would reflect the feelings of Zambians as 'One Zambia, One Nation'.

"But what we have been given is a recipe of anarchy blatantly being perpetuated by a bunch of lawyers led by none other than Dr. Chongwe who proclaims that owing to age and seniority at the bar they are not bound to err," Chimbeka stated. "It is because of that misconception that Dr. Chongwe misdirected his fellow commissioners to overstep the scope of work they were mandated to undertake."

Chimbeka described the commission's recommendations as treacherous and that he was shocked that Dr Chongwe could assert that Kabimba's comments on the recommendations were outside his role as PF secretary general.

"The views he expressed reflected the policy of the party pertaining to the Barotseland Agreement," Chimbeka stated.

"The most logical thing to do is agree on the boundaries of Barotseland at the time of the Barotseland Agreement. Thereafter call for a referendum within the boundaries and the result will put to rest the issue of the Barotseland Agreement."


Labels: , , , ,


Read more...

Saturday, September 12, 2009

No extra land for farm blocs, chief Mwene Mutondo tells govt

No extra land for farm blocs, chief Mwene Mutondo tells govt
Written by Mwala Kalaluka
Saturday, September 12, 2009 2:08:05 AM

CHIEF Mwene Mutondo of the Nkoya people in Kaoma has told the government that no extra land would be given for the establishment of farm blocs in his chiefdom because he is deeply disturbed by the behaviour of government officials.

In a letter dated August 16, 2009 addressed to agriculture minister Dr Brian Chituwo, Mwene Mutondo warned the government to be wary that issues of land had caused problems in many parts of Africa. He stated that this should not be allowed to be the case in Zambia and Kaoma in particular. The subject of the letter was highlighted as Kalumwange Farm Bloc.

“In the first place, I would like to thank you and the government for working hard and uniting the people of Zambia and wish you God’s blessings,” Mwene Mutondo opened his letter.

“I, however, wish to bring to your attention a very sensitive issue, which I am not pleased with. This is the Kalumwange Farm Block in Kaoma. The way the issue is being handled by your officers leaves much to be desired.”

Mwene Mutondo stated that as traditional custodian of land, he was deeply disturbed with the way things were happening in Kaoma.

“I fail to understand why your junior officers could facilitate the movement of surveyors to map the farm block without my knowledge. Your officers seem to be in a hurry to acquire land without my consent by using my suspended induna Kasimba, leaving me behind and yet the land in question is under my chiefdom,” Mwene Mutondo’s letter read in part.

“I strongly suspect that your officers have a hidden agenda. Last year, I wrote to your permanent secretary in which I complained about the behaviour of the officers who seem to be conniving with some rebel or unfaithful area indunas in my chiefdom but to date the permanent secretary has not responded.”

Mwene Mutondo further stated that he had a good working and cordial relationship with the government of the day.

“With regard to farm blocks, I am surprised that out of the four farm blocks in place, not even one has been fully developed and have all been turned into primitive villages as opposed to farm blocks. Some selfish individuals acquired massive portions of land and have resold them to other people who have equally failed to develop them,” he stated.

“I therefore find it very strange that out of the three quarters of land given to state, nothing has benefited the people of my chiefdom.”

He pointed that it was in this regard that he was questioning the government’s intention to acquire an extra 100, 000 hectares for farm blocks when the current ones had yielded nothing. Mwene Mutondo stated that he had consulted his children and subjects over the position he had taken.

Labels: , ,


Read more...