Friday, August 29, 2008

Avoid petty politics, Dipak urges Rupiah's team

Avoid petty politics, Dipak urges Rupiah's team
By Chansa Kabwela
Friday August 29, 2008 [04:00]

Former commerce minister Dipak Patel yesterday urged Vice-President Rupiah Banda's campaign team to avoid petty politics devoid of real issues because Zambians are looking for serious economic managers to sustain President Levy Mwanawasa's legacy. And former home affairs deputy minister Edwin Hatembo said it was cheap for Vice-President Banda's campaign team manager Benny Tetamashimba to say that finance minister Ng'andu Magande has no support in Southern Province.

Reacting to Tetamashimba's statement yesterday that there was no need for a nationally televised debate for all MMD presidential aspiring candidate, Patel said the difference between Vice-President Banda's campaign team and that of Magande was that the latter's team was dealing with real national issues while the former was dealing with petty politics with no ideas on how to sustain President Mwanawasa's legacy.

Tetamashimba's statement read: “We have read the approved statement from Hon Magande through his campaign team in which he wants the MMD party candidates to appear for a televised debate to the Zambian people to see who is the best candidate for president in the MMD.

“I am the official campaign manager for RB. When NEC elects him as our candidate, and I may be biased in my judgement being in this position. But I am not that kind. Let me be judged by what I stand for, the truth under whatever circumstances.

“Since Mr. Dipak Patel is not MMD but campaigner for Hon Magande, I ask him to get clarifications from the national secretary Hon Dr Katele Kalumba or the chairman for elections Hon Mike Mulongoti whether what he is proposing is the MMD way of NEC choosing a candidate. The constitution of MMD has no clause of how to select a candidate and those who don't know the procedure should ask the national secretary. NEC makes all decisions in between the conventions and Mr Patel is supposed to know this.

“The candidates will, if the national secretary advises, only speak to the NEC on 5th September 2008 who have the power to choose a candidate for this by-election and not for 2011. NEC will not choose a party president or fill vacancies.

“Mr Patel must inform the MMD which region will fully give Hon Magande the vote when his own Southern Province regards Mr Hakainde Hichilema as their preferred son. Hon Magande is not popular in Southern Province and he shouldn't mislead that he can defeat Mr Hakainde Hichilema in Southern where the MMD has no single seat and Mr Magande ran away from standing in Southern Province for fear of losing.

“Let Mr Patel and Hon Magande tell the nation whether MMD must throw away its constitutional advantage in the coming by-election for self-centred people. Genuine people who love MMD have decided to wait for 2011 and the MMD must look to the MMD loving people than those who are greedy and self-centred, as we shall be going to the convention.

“Does Mr Patel think that if Mr Magande was in the sandals of the Acting President Rupiah Banda and was replaced to stand as presidential candidate in the coming by-election by an easterner, Southern Province would have ignored the embarrassment to Hon Magande and vote for RB? If the answer is no, does Hon Magande think that the easterners could vote for Hon Magande when their own who was so close and only needed to complete the term was forced out by selfish people?

“The party leaders in the provinces and their NEC members have stated clearly that they want Acting President R Banda to stand in the by-election to complete the term of office of the late President. Are these people who signed that they want RB going to vote against him in NEC when we know they all have integrity.

“Hon Magande will be honourable with his campaigners to unite the party by supporting the Acting President to stand in the presidential by-election. Ministers should not bring in the issue of betrayal.

Let Hon Magande not mislead the nation and his supporters to bring disunity in MMD by claiming that he was the appointed heir. The appointed heir was the one the President appointed as Vice-President. We have to support His Excellency the Acting President R Banda as MMD presidential candidate for the MMD to easily win the election.”

But in response, Patel - who is member of the Elect Magande Campaign Team - said he was forced, yet again, to respond to Tetamashimba who started this debate about President Mwanawasa's successor although people from Vice-President Banda's campaign team deliberately accuse him (Patel) of having insensitively started the debate.

“I am again forced to react to Tetamashimba, who in-fact began the issue of succession in his comments to Radio QFM, when we were in a period of mourning,” Patel said. “I now refer to Tetamashimba's statement of today (yesterday) with regards to our challenge for a nationally televised debate. If his candidate is serious, he should not have any fear to a debate and let all Zambians see for themselves what his favoured candidate has to offer and let the people of Zambia judge for themselves as to the competencies of all candidates.

“Why does Tetamashimba not lay bare all the accomplishments of his candidate in the MMD? Since Tetamashimba is the official campaign manager of RB and suggests that I am not an MMD member, perhaps he can tell us as to when his candidate became an MMD member. But to ridiculously suggest that Hon Magande has no support from Southern Province is naïve and foolish. “In-fact he has national support. This support is not from “engineered petitions”. He represents national politics, not tribal politics.

He is not soliciting support based on tribal alliances. He is soliciting support based on Mwanawasa's legacy and policies that need to be continued.

“He is soliciting support based on performance, competence, experience. Perhaps Tetamashimba should find out if it is true what Hon Machila has said that, “In our last full Cabinet meeting, there was an indication of who President Mwanawasa did not consider as his successor and all of us know this person by implication”.

“This is pre-eminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, candidly and fearlessly. From all MMD presidential aspiring candidates, if we could first know where we are and where we want to go and why, we could better judge and make informed decisions on what to do and how to do it, and the type of leadership that is required, to not only carry the vision and dreams of our beloved President Levy Mwanawasa but to ensure that, not only is it carried forward but sustained for the long term good of all Zambians.

“We are now into the 17th year since the MMD economic and social policies were initiated with the declared objective and promise of putting an end to poverty and achieve citizens' economic emancipation and economic growth. It is very disheartening to hear in this day and age, when people talk of ‘tribal alliances’, when a son of the soil of Africa, Barrack Obama who had the “Audacity of Hope” is today a presidential candidate in the United States of America.

“Surely, the criterion for selecting leadership has to go beyond one's tribe or race. Are the virtues of honesty, integrity, knowledge, performance and experience among many other attributes not important? Are issues of generational change not important? Is our national motto, One Zambia One Nation, not important? Is, for an elected politician, to aspire to the highest offices of the MMD and a government wrong? Is being an unelected politician to aspire to a high office ethically, morally or politically right?

“What will the people of Zambia; the opposition say if a MMD candidate is an unelected politician in this most unusual circumstance that we face today? Is prudent economic management not important anymore? Or, is obtaining power at any cost with tribal alliances more important? Is passing on the baton to a new generation of Zambians now a taboo? “Magande does not think and believe tribe.

He thinks Zambia and Zambians. He thinks economic growth. He thinks citizens' economic empowerment. He thinks good governance. He thinks end poverty. He thinks women's empowerment. He thinks better sanitation and water for all. He thinks better roads, housing, education, health and infrastructure. He thinks more agricultural production. He thinks good governance. He thinks develop Zambia.

“Unfortunately, in the very recent past, there has been something very crude and heartless and unfeeling in haste by some, elected and non-elected politicians, to succeed President Mwanawasa for the sheer sake of gaining power and hopefully the ultimate office, that of the President.

“We must all remember that we are not the Republic of the Ngoni, the Republic of the Tonga, the Republic of the Bemba, the Republic of the Lozi, or any other one tribe. But we are the one and only Republic of Zambia for any and all the tribes of Zambia, including all the minority races in Zambia.

“An ominous dark cloud is above Zambia, we have lost to God a great son, a leader of Zambia, President Levy Mwanawasa (May His Soul Rest in Peace). The MMD has to now elect a new leader. Magande wants to be President, first because he can lead our country to the required economic standing that will set us apart in Africa.

“He has the capacity and experience to build a better Zambia for all. He has the energy, time, experience and age on his side. For most of his life, he has been employed in service of Zambia. Under President Mwanawasa, like many others in Cabinet, he believes in the ‘New Deal’ for Zambia, and like many others helped begin to deliver the ‘New Deal’.

“Yes, in execution of his very difficult duties as Minister of Finance & National Planning, it has not always been possible to please all the people all the time. And this has sometimes been the reason for perceived differences between him and some of his Cabinet colleagues. It was never personal and never shall be. It was always in the greater good of Zambia and not an individual.

“It was always team work. It was always the shared vision of a ‘New Deal’ for Zambia. Fortunate as we are in our new-found beginning of economic prosperity, we still remain fragile for much of the economic vision and dreams of President Mwanawasa. It still needs to be vigorously carried forward and implemented, in the period, what would have been the remaining term of his office till 2011 and beyond. It is therefore in the interest of every citizen imperative that we maintain this vision.

“Magande has had the honour to be one of the economic advisors of our beloved and distinguised President, Levy Mwanawasa, and as such, to hold up in eternal glory, his hands in the economic and political reforms he had initiated. Magande should be untrue to himself, to his promises and to the declarations of the MMD party platform upon which he was elected as a Member of Parliament, if he did not make the maintenance and enforcement of those reforms a most important feature of what he would like to get done as the President of Zambia.

“President Mwanawasa's reforms were directed to abuses of office, good governance, and citizens' economic empowerment, rule of law, integrity and economic growth of all and for all of Zambia. So, Magande not only says to the MMD, but to all Zambians, 'we are indeed economically moving toward an era of good feeling', but he also realises that there can be no era of good feeling save among men and women of goodwill.

“For these reasons, Magande feels justified in believing that the greatest change that we have witnessed under President Mwanawasa has been the change in moral climate of Zambia. Strong hearts and helpful hands are needed, and fortunately we have them in every part of our beloved country. There are some national questions in the solution of which patriotism is needed and must exclude tribalism.

“Distrust of capacity, integrity, and high purposes of the Zambian people is not an inspirational theme. Dark pictures and gloomy forebodings are worse than useless. The prophets of doom never will be the builders of our Republic. If there are those among us who want to make our way more difficult must not be disheartened.

The path to progress is seldom smooth. New, not old things are often found hard to do. We are again undergoing the same ordeal, as we did as Zambians in the past, for having to fight for change, for having to find the new and not the old or the same.

“Yet, difficult as it is, the new task before us today, differs from the tasks set before by our beloved President Mwanawasa, who preserved the dignity of our Republic, the spirit in which these tasks must now be undertaken and these problems faced. Magande has faith that we shall not prove false, nor betray the memories, desires, hopes, dreams and vision of President Mwanawasa. He left us a splendid legacy that we now enjoy.

“And now, in our turn have an assured confidence that we shall be able to leave this heritage unwasted and enlarged to our children and our children's children. To do so we must show, not merely in crisis, but in everyday affairs of life, the qualities of practical intelligence, of courage and endurance and above all the power of devotion to a lofty ideal. “Magande knows and understands the tasks before us.

Magande realises to the full, the responsibility which it involves. We are to beware of all people who would turn the tasks and necessities of our nation to their own private profit or use them for building up private power, perhaps not for the immediate but certainly in the near future.

“Magande has not built nor ever asked for any ‘tribal alliances’ or pacts, instead he has sought alliances and pacts based on policy and building upon the foundations of President Mwanawasa's legacy. There is no shortcut to the making of these ideals into realities.

Zambia has witnessed in the past the futility and mischief of all ill-considered remedies for political, social and economic disorders. We are all mindful today as never before of the friction when choosing a leader, and we must learn its causes and reduce its evil consequences by sober and tested norms.

“One cannot stand in this presence and be unmindful of the tremendous responsibility. But with the realisation comes the surge of high resolve, and there is reassurance in belief in the God-given destiny of our Republic. As the MMD decides on its presidential candidate, the question that the national executive committee of the MMD has to ask is: who shall live up to the great trust, to change for the new and not the old, to putting in office an elected or unelected politician?

“These are not the days of triumph; these are days of dedication. These are days for unity of purpose. The MMD should muster not only the forces of the party, but of the Zambian humanity and their hopes and desires. People's hearts wait upon us; people's hopes call upon us to say what we will do. And remember, as Abraham Lincoln once said: 'A house divided against itself cannot stand'.”

And Edwin Hatembo said it was shameless for Tetamashimba to say Magande had no support in Southern Province. He said the majority of NEC members in the province were behind Magande.

He said the MMD needs a candidate in Magande who has no scandals, who is popular, an economic manager, a non-tribalist and an experienced man with a lot of both local and international experience.

“The international community respects this man because he is a hard worker and a man of integrity. When other candidates are adopted, the opposition and the media will go to town to expose how scandalous they are. I also have some of their scandals, as you know I am a former minister of home affairs.

I have the archive of scandals,” Hatembo said. “They will dig their past in the parastatals they served and in other government ministries where they practiced tribalism. Magande has a clean record and will win MMD this election. So Teta should just shut-up. He has no moral right to speak on behalf of the people of Southern Province.

Let him just continue imposing his candidate on the people of North-Western Province. As far as we are concerned in Southern Province, Magande is the man and I am talking to you from Livingstone, the capital of the province. And ask Teta to tell us if his candidate surrendered his UNIP membership card.”

Labels: , , , ,


Read more...

Friday, August 22, 2008

Dipak rules out Rupiah

Dipak rules out Rupiah
By Chibaula Silwamba and Amos Malupenga
Friday August 22, 2008 [04:00]

Rupiah Banda is far from what President Levy Mwanawasa had in mind for a successor, former commerce minister Dipak Patel said yesterday. And Patel said in his opinion, finance minister Ng'andu Magande was the most suited candidate. Meanwhile, the opposition UPND yesterday said it had learnt with disbelief that the ruling MMD was scheming to amend the Zambian Constitution to enable Banda to continue ruling without going for a presidential by-election following President Mwanawasa's death.

Reacting to MMD spokesperson Benny Tetamashimba's statement that there are no two ways for the MMD but to automatically pick Vice-President Rupiah Banda as its presidential candidate when a presidential by-election is called, Patel said Vice-President Banda was a nice person but far from what President Mwanawasa had in mind for a successor.

Patel said there were important distinctions between leadership succession and the recruitment of leaders.

“Succession is a process that involves the assumption or transference of leadership from one person or group to another,” Patel said. “How successful, peaceful or effective such an assumption or transference might be will depend on the relevant laws, historical experiences, norms and cultural traditions of the peoples concerned as well as the existential circumstances. Where the laws and traditions are observed, the succession is likely to occur.

In general, leadership succession in post-independence Africa has tended to be a product of crude political manipulations, rebellions or military coups rather that the peaceful application of the constitutional process.”

Patel said this was due, partly, to the fact that constitutionalism is not well-founded in Africa and partly due to the primacy of politics. He said the constitution provided basic foundations for legitimacy of the government to rule and the people's rights to demand accountability and transparency from the government.

Patel said the constitutions of all African countries virtually make provisions for the establishment and maintenance of accountability and transparency but that it was the manner in which those systems had performed which was problematic.

“This deficiency in constitutionalism is one of the major contributory factors to bad governance in Africa,” Patel said. “Politics is a struggle for power. In a democracy, the struggle takes place within a competitive framework regulated by rules, principles, norms and conventions. In much of African politics is personalised and transformed into a means of acquiring personal wealth and power, thus those in power and position of leadership do all they can to keep others out.”

Patel said such people ignore the democratic principle, norms and conventions. He said in Africa, politics ceases to be a properly organised competitive struggle for power; it becomes simply a struggle between those who have the power and want to keep it and those who wish to take it away from them and use it for their own personal benefits.

“Hence the struggle between leader resolve itself into one for the price of power and not as a competition for better policies and solutions to the peoples' problems,” Patel said. “And this is what we must at all costs avoid in the MMD. Some of the fundamental legacies of President Mwanawasa are the observance of the rule of law, the fight against corruption and empowerment of our citizens.

Keeping this in mind, I was shocked to hear from some very senior people in government and the MMD talk about a possibility of amending the Constitution that would allow Vice-President Rupiah Banda to continue as President till 2011. This is not only absurd but dangerous.”

Patel said the Constitution of Zambia clearly defines what should happen when a Republican president dies. He said in this case, Zambians are expecting to go for presidential polls on or before November 17, 2008.

“As to who could be a potential presidential candidate, there are only a few in the MMD who could satisfy the necessary qualities that are required,” Patel said. “President Mwanawasa had always been very clear about it - no corrupt person should succeed him and he was also desirous of a generational change. I had last met him on April 8, 2008 at his office. It seemed to me from the conversation we had that he wanted to make a major reshuffle of Cabinet soon after the AU summit and also make public his choice.

Even though he had never made public his preferred candidate, he had made up his mind. I have no doubt whatsoever that the first lady is aware of his choice, as would few others. So when I heard my friend Tetamashimba speak on Radio QFM, it is very far from what President Mwanawasa Mwanawasa had in mind, for even though Rupiah Banda is a good man, he does not represent a generational change.

In my humble opinion, the most suited candidate for our times today and the future is Ng'andu Peter Magande. He has all the important attributes - credibility, integrity, vision and is passionate about the good Zambians and Zambia can do and achieve, and together with President Mwanawasa has put Zambia on course for rapid economic growth. He is not corrupt, he does not stand for nonsense, he is not a tribalist and he believes in One Zambia, One Nation.”

Responding to a question from a QFM Radio presenter during a special programme on which Zambians were passing messages of condolences on the death of President Mwanawasa on Wednesday, Tetamashimba said it would be very difficult for the MMD to choose a candidate to stand in the elections outside acting President Banda.

The presenter had asked Tetamashimba if some confusion was expected in MMD, looking at the power-hungry people in the party.
In his response, Tetamashimba said President Mwanawasa had indicated that he would not support a corrupt person or a thief as MMD candidate in the 2011 elections, and that was still the position for the MMD.

“First and foremost, yes, I can say that there could be some people and there are some people who took advantage of the President's sickness while in Paris.

They were going round and so on and so forth and I think Honourable Lameck Chibombamilimo came out and spoke about it,” Tetamashimba said. “But I can assure you that President Mwanawasa said that in 2011 he will not campaign for an MMD candidate if that person will be a plunderer, he will be a corrupt person. That is what he told us. And that message is still there up to today. We are not going to allow thieves, we are not going to allow corrupt people to take over the MMD.

The MMD now; we have no acting president in MMD, we have no acting vice-president in MMD, we only have a chairman who constitutionally has no mandate to act as president or act as vice-president of the party. But our friends in Cabinet through the constitutional provisions and through the decision of President Mwanawasa himself, he appointed His Honour the Vice-President to act as President until he returns.

Unfortunately, the passing on of the President is not going to make him return in the form he could take over power and I think that for now we have an acting President who I believe is supposed to be sworn in as we go through all these things. And when he is sworn in as acting President, I don't know but as a politician I can tell you that it will be very difficult for the MMD to choose another candidate to stand in the elections outside RB.”

Tetamashimba said the moment Vice-President Banda is sworn in as acting Republican President, it should be automatic for the ruling party to allow him to stand and then choose somebody who would help him to campaign in the by-elections.

“I have been told that the PF and UPND have been trying to think of how to have an alignment to defeat the MMD and they started doing that two days before the President died,” Tetamashimba said. “But I can assure you that Zambians are saying people should do what President Mwanawasa was doing in terms of the economic activities and so on.”

Meanwhile, UPND chairperson for legal Jack Mwiimbu yesterday said they were aware that MMD was trying to amend the Republican Constitution to allow Vice-President Banda to continue in power from where President Mwanawasa ended without going through an election. Mwiimbu said that was undemocratic and tantamount to canceling the forthcoming presidential by-election in total disregard of the Constitution.

Mwiimbu said at the time, the nation wanted to mourn President Mwanawasa with respect and dignity.

Labels: , ,


Read more...

Monday, May 07, 2007

More still needs to be done

More still needs to be done
By Editor
Monday May 07, 2007 [04:00]

It would be immoral, unfair and unjust for The Post to claim total or unapportioned credit over the Chiluba case. We disagree with Bishop Paul Mususu’s statement to the effect that The Post single-handedly pushed the “Chiluba is a thief” case until now that the London judge has confirmed it. There were many other people who took very high risks, probably more than The Post took, in exposing and fighting Chiluba’s banditry.

The contributions made by Dipak Patel in exposing and fighting Chiluba’s corruption cannot be ignored or belittled in any way. Also the role played by Edith Nawakwi opened a huge fissure in the whole conspiracy. And there are many other citizens whose names, for one reason or another, we cannot at this point in time publicly acknowledge.

And we totally disagree with any statements that try to belittle President Levy Mwanawasa’s contribution in bringing Chiluba to answer for his thefts. We accept and acknowledge that for one reason or another, Levy exhibited a number of contradictions in this fight. We don’t know, and only time will tell, whether some of these contradictions were deliberate and conscious or were purely the product of oversight and unconscious on his part. But we still maintain that for all these shortcomings, for all these inadequacies and contradictions, Levy’s contribution in this case still stands out and cannot be belittled in any way.

We also sincerely believe that in trying to belittle Levy’s contribution to this fight, we are actually dangerously playing into Chiluba’s hands and without realising it, aiding him and his tandem of thieves at a time when we should be nailing them to the cross. Let us first acknowledge Levy’s very positive contribution and give him a pat on the back and then say to him:

“Brother, you have done well, but there’s still a lot to be done and let’s start to deal with this and that problem, contradiction and deficiency.” It will not benefit the fight against corruption in this country if we try to freeze and frustrate Levy’s contribution to it. Levy will continue to be the President of our country for the next four years and we therefore need to find a way to make him deliver on this score instead of making him turn his back to it. We cannot ignore the presidency in this fight. It is a force that cannot be marginalised if we are to harbour any hope of winning this fight.

While it cannot be disputed that the levels of corruption in government or the public service have not gone down, it cannot be fairly and honestly said that Levy and Chiluba are the same when it comes to corruption. If our opinion on this matter can be respected given the credit we are being accorded in fighting corruption and in the light of our experience and track record, we would without reservations say that Levy and Chiluba are totally different people when it comes to corruption.

Levy is not using or abusing the state apparatus to steal public funds the way Chiluba did. There is no conspiracy on the part of Levy to defraud the Zambian people that we know of the way we knew of Chiluba’s. Levy is not using State House to steal public funds the way Chiluba did. What appears to be true to us is that Levy has miserably failed to transform the government system and make it less corrupt.

While Levy acknowledges that there is still a lot of corruption in government he has not come up with any meaningful, if any, legal and organisational reforms to deal with corruption. Instead the only thing that we have heard from him are declarations of his resolve to fight corruption without articulating how this will be done. Our legal system is still based on the colonial or pre-independence Penal Code that has been totally overtaken by the challenges of today’s complicated white-collar crime.

The tens of millions of dollars that Chiluba and his friends have stolen are not prosecuted in a different way from that of a poor person who steals a chicken from his neighbour’s backyard at night. Apart from the Task Force that was created with a very limited mandate to deal with the corruption of the Chiluba presidency, no new institutions have been created by Levy.

We have not even seen any reforms in the operations of the Anti Corruption Commission or the Drug Enforcement Commission or indeed the police itself to enable them deal with corruption efficiently, effectively and in an orderly manner. We are not seeing the initiatives that we saw under the Kaunda presidency in dealing with corruption. Under Kaunda we had SITET (Special Investigations Team on Economy and Trade) which was a good attempt at dealing with white-collar crime.

This was the institution Chiluba immediately abolished when he came to power claiming it was politicised to target KK’s political opponents and was violating citizens’ rights.

We are not also seeing the initiatives that led to the creation of ACC and DEC under the Kaunda regime. Without appropriate legal and organisational reforms, it will be impossible to fight corruption in this country. We have to adopt a number of new specific measures in our fight against corruption imposed by necessity and reality. We shouldn’t forget that reality imposes its rules and formulas on society. It is an unquestionable, and dialectics teaches us, that what in a given moment is a correct method, later on may be an incorrect one. That is what dialectics teaches us.

Anything else is dogmatism, mechanism. It is a desire to apply measures which were determined by our special needs at a given moment to another situation in which the needs are different, in which other circumstances prevail. We need to move forward and face the realities of governing a Zambia of the 21st century that is infested with very high levels of, and reeking in every pore with, corruption. Yes, there is need to preach and call for high levels of honesty in the management of public affairs.

As we have said before, virtue must be nourished but vice springs up spontaneously like weeds and grows by itself. We must always bear that in mind. If we do otherwise, while nourishing virtue, we are simultaneously paving way for vice. That is a reality and we must not lose sight of it.

Let us avoid approaches to the fight against corruption that fragment our forces. Let’s help Levy to make a positive contribution to this fight by making his role in it relatively easier. Let’s criticise him where criticism is due and is legitimate and let’s give him credit where this is legitimately due to him. Those who seek and fight for the establishment of a more fair, just and humane society cannot do so through unfair, unjust methods.

Every Zambian of goodwill should be drawn to this fight. Even thieves who have repented should be given a place in this fight. What we need is not one force but a combined force of all our people to defeat corruption in this country. As for Levy we advise him to listen to the voices of our people on this issue and take corrective action or engage them in a positive way so that together our country can be liberated from the scourge of corruption.

Levy can’t do it alone, he needs the support and cooperation of all Zambians of goodwill. And his leadership is much more needed in mobilising our people and arming them to fight corruption. If he doesn’t do so, he may end up being consumed by corruption himself and tomorrow the bells that are today tolling for Chiluba may toll for him.

Labels: , , ,


Read more...