Tuesday, September 06, 2016

(THE PATRIOT ZW) Story behind demos

(THE PATRIOT ZW) Story behind demos
By Patience Rusare -
September 1, 2016

ZIMBABWE, in recent weeks, has been rocked by violent demonstrations, mainly by MDC-T, Zimbabwe People First supporters and the ‘civil’ society, in a bid to effect regime change.

A spate of clashes spread on the streets of Harare as the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) fought running battles with violent protesters who hurled stones at law enforcement agents, set tyres ablaze, burnt a ZRP and a ZBC vehicle, while some razed to the ground the popular Copacabana flea market in the central business district (CBD).

They looted shops including one of the chain supermarkets Choppies and attacked innocent citizens, in the mayhem.

‘Managed Change Formula’

It is important to note that what is happening now is exactly what happened between 2007 and 2008 under ‘Save Zimbabwe Campaign’, then led by Dewa Mavhinga.

It is a repeat of the regime change agenda coined ‘Managed Change Formula’ by the International Crisis Group (ICG).

Managed Change Formula is a pre-programmed series of co-ordinated events taking place in different parts of the world, but timed to happen as part of a series with one event designed to influence the decisions of the next event and so on.

On March 5 2007, the ICG published a report titled Zimbabwe: An end to stalemate which claimed that a solution to the problem of Zimbabwe had been found as an agreement had been reached between the democrats of MDC and the moderates of ZANU PF to form an interim government.

In its report, long before people knew, the ICG, purported to be an intelligence supplier to Western governments documented that, ‘ZANU PF would negotiate with the MDC on a constitutional framework, power-sharing agreement, detailed agenda and benchmarks for a two-year political transition beginning in March 2008’.

And exactly six days later, there was violence as MDC senior party officials like Morgan Tsvangirai and Nelson Chamisa deliberately provoked the ZRP in order to be restrained physically.

The violence was timed to influence a meeting organised by the British Parliament to discuss the ‘Zimbabwean issue’.

Again, it was to influence the March 23 2007 US Congress meeting on Zimbabwe.

It is at the US Congress meeting where Dr Douglas Gwatidzo, who was chairperson of the Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights; the same doctor who treated Tsvangirai, Chamisa and other MDC officials, gave an exaggerated medical report on the extent of the injuries.

In his accounts Dr Gwatidzo admitted to having been warned in advance to prepare to receive and treat injured people prior to the violence.

However, the climax was on March 28 2007, at a British sponsored hearing on Zimbabwe in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) where Britain called for Chapter Seven sanctions and Zimbabwe only survived the sanctions because China and Russia used their veto.

In events strikingly similar to the repetitive cycle of violence in 2007, the current disturbances, however, came at a time the MDC-T has reached a dead end and all opposition political parties on the table have no chance of winning elections.

After all failed attempts to give Tsvangirai and MDC countless political make-overs, US and the West ‘went shopping’ for a new face and voice with the same message (regime change).

The latest protests come nearly two months after a ‘stay-away’ advocated by a social media movement #ThisFlag led by one Pastor Evan Mawarire.

Enter Mawarire

Pastor Mawarire was barely known beyond his small congregation in Harare when he posted a ‘scripted video’ on the internet in April calling for Zimbabweans to ‘shutdown’ the country.

As part of his training to what he is doing now, Mawarire and his wife Samantha were in London, England, between 2007 and 2011 disguised as directors of church-cum companies His Generation Ministries and World Changers Limited respectively.

After his initial training he was despatched back to Zimbabwe in 2011 and set up his own church called ‘His Generation’ that has a congregation of about 50 – again another cover-up.

The narrative used to describe Pastor Mawarire as a simple pastor who came out of nowhere is not by coincidence.

And Mawarire is not a political accident who emerged as the voice of the voiceless Zimbabweans who took his creativity to the social media.

As part of further training, Mawarire had to undergo leadership development training.

In The Patriot of August 19-25 2016, a story headlined ‘Mawarire: Con artist or activist’ highlights that upon his return from Britain in 2011, Mawarire underwent some sort of leadership-development training, attending the Toastmasters International (TI) sessions.

Toastmasters International is a non-profit educational organisation that operates clubs worldwide for the purpose of helping members improve their communication, public speaking and leadership skills.
It offers a programme of communication and leadership projects designed to help people learn the art of speaking, listening and thinking.

After about 10 years of training, he knew exactly what to say, to ‘move’ the Nation.

Besides, he had a ‘good’ background; serving as child president in Zimbabwe between 1993 and 1994 after having been elected child MP for Mashonaland West Province’s Hurungwe constituency.
In 2011, he was chosen one of Zimbabwe’s 10 Outstanding Young People by the Junior Chamber International (JCI) for moral leadership.

The JCI is an American non-governmental organisation (NGO) of young people between 18 and 40 years old.
It’s supposed to encourage youths to be responsible citizens and to participate in efforts towards social and economic development and international co-operation, good-will and understanding.

Pre-meditated violence

Prior to the violent protests, international media was deployed to cover every form of violence against these groups for distribution to the rest of the world.

Last week’s protests were designed to damage the image of President Robert Mugabe at the Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD) VI summit in Kenya and at the 36th Southern African Development Community (SADC) summit in Swaziland.

The protests were designed to influence SADC to have Zimbabwe on their agenda.

It is our reading that the climax could be slated for the UN Security Council meeting running concurrently with the General Assembly to be held next month in New York, US.
Mawarire’s arrest was well orchestrated.

He wanted to be arrested and the ZRP unwittingly played right into his hands. He became the ‘victim’.

And the huge crowds that gathered at the Harare Rotten Row Magistrates’ Courts during his hearing were all staged to strengthen his profile.

He now had an excuse to leave the country and go to South Africa; first to garner support of fellow Africans, before travelling to US to mobilise support of Zimbabweans in the Diaspora sympathetic to opposition parties.

And the timing was also calculated.

Mawarire had to be in the US for at least a month, touring most strategic American states while mobilising support for demonstrations at the UN General Assembly in New York from September 17-21 2016 because President Mugabe will be attending the meeting.

Upon his arrival in the US, Mawarire visited different cities including Atlanta, Washington DC and Dallas.

He met with US personalities including former congressman Ambassador Andrew Jackson Young from Georgia.
Ambassador Young once served as the United States Ambassador to United Nations.

While in Washington DC, Mawarire had to put up a little drama as he wept while addressing a seminar at the Atlantic Council think tank.

The Patriot can reveal that Mawarire plans to stage the protests daily, with Saturday and Wednesday as the major days.

On Saturday September 17, protests will be at the Zimbabwe Consulate offices from 12pm to 4pm ‘to raise awareness to the world all over’.

“Saturday’s demo is mainly to raise awareness to the world all over,” said one of the organisers, Moses Mafusire, on facebook page North America #Thisflag.

“Protesting kuUN headquarters is a little complicated because security is tight, so our message might not be heard easily and second, there will be other protestors from different countries protesting about their issues, so we will be sharing attention.

“So on Saturday, we will be at the Zim UN offices, so the attention is focused on us and our objective to raise awareness is easily executed.”

Another organiser of the demonstrations, Chiwoniso Mpofu, urged protesters to come mainly on September 21 to ‘heckle’ President Mugabe as he gives his address to the General Assembly.

“Wednesday 21 is very important because this is the day Mugabe is going to give his speech and address the GA,” she said.

“It will be great if those who can attend during the week to come on Wednesday 21 and confront him.
“We won’t be able to see him, but while he talks we will be talking too.”

For the march, the organisers are yet to secure permits for various areas between Union Square, the Palace Hotel and the Zim Consulate buildings.

Apparently shuttle buses are to ferry people from nearby areas such as Manhattan, Brooklyn, Plainfield, White Plains and Iselin.

And accommodation is all in place for those travelling from Boston, Massachusetts, Virginia, Texas, Indiana, Philadelphia and Washington DC.

Some protestors are booked at The Courtyard Newark Downtown located at 858 Broad streel Newark NJ 07102 under the name ‘Zimbabwe Family Reunion Group’.

The organisers say they expect thousands of people to attend the demos and speakers include, Mawarire, Thomas Mapfumo, Dr Noah Manyika, Promise Mkwananzi of Tajamuka and Patson Dzamara.

Dr Manyika is the founder of ‘Build Zimbabwe’, an organisation opposed to ZANU PF.

Again the New York demonstrations are designed to ensure Zimbabwe is discussed at the Security Council and Chapter seven sanctions is enacted.

Concurrently back home, the protests will gain momentum.

They are planning on increasing the violent protests from once a week, to twice or thrice a week.
Protestors will continue to provoke the ZRP for clashes as the pictures will legitimise their claims of ‘gross human rights abuses’ in Zimbabwe at the international platform.

They want the UN to intervene under the pretext that the country is now a threat to international peace and security.

They are willing to go to any length to have Zimbabwe on the agenda.

On August 10 2016, at an Itai Dzamara-organised demonstration, demonstrators tried to use children as ‘human shields’.

Innocent children, flowers in hand, were put at the front to confront ZRP officers.
The protestors were hoping ZRP would beat or disperse the children with teargas and water cannons and have the pictures all over the world with headlines screaming ‘Gross human rights abuses’, but their efforts were in vain.

Riot police neither attacked the children nor adult protestors who had no police clearance, a prerequisite to hold a demonstration.

Could it be that opposition forces are becoming desperate by the day?
NERA: Another Save Zimbabwe campaign?

One thing the opposition is good at is re-inventing itself into coalitions or alliances by a variety of names.

National Electoral Reform Agenda (NERA) is just like the 2007 Save Zimbabwe Campaign that brought together most opposition political parties and major civil society organisations with the agenda of ousting President Mugabe from power.

Opposition parties that had become irrelevant have suddenly found their voices.
Mawarire’s call to remove a democratically elected Government presented them with an opportunity to become relevant.

They are well aware they are not capable of winning any elections hence their resorting to violence.
Opposition parties are thriving on violence.

They have nothing to lose in promoting the violence and in fact, it is only violence that gives them political relevance.

Who can explain why NERA, formed in December 2015, is suddenly active after eight months of hibernation?

Suddenly, from not more than five political party signatures since December to June 2016 to 22 political party signatures in just a month?

Is there a third force behind?

They have been told to join hands for what they call the ‘greater good’ of removing President Mugabe and ZANU PF from power.

While Mawarire is garnering for support from the West and the US, these opposition parties will continue to cause havoc in the country.

They have called for another demonstration (today) and hope innocent citizens get seriously injured or die in the process.

No wonder the false social media message that a soldier had stoned a boy to death last week Friday.
This is what agents of regime change want.

They are not worried about the safety of citizens, let alone the needs of citizens.
They do not care that the so-called ‘Arab spring’ did not bring any good summer to countries such as Egypt, Tunisia and much worse Libya.

Prior to 2011, Muammar Gaddafi had turned Libya into Africa’s most progressive welfare state. Libya had the highest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and highest life expectancy in Africa. Less people lived below the poverty datum line than in The Netherlands.

It boasted free healthcare, education and numerous subsidies to support the well-being of the Libyan people

But look at what happened to Libya after the US/NATO interventionism.

It is now a failed state in complete political anarchy, with a destroyed economy and a war-torn society.

Libya does not have a functioning government, control of its borders or basic public services.
It’s being torn apart by warlords and rival militant groups.

Leaked emails for investigation of US Hillary Clinton’s server scandal revealed that the war against Libya was waged for economic and political reasons.

Libya’s nationalised oil reserves and plans to use gold as the chief reserve currency in Africa to compete against the euro and US dollar threatened US capitalist penetration in Africa.
It was never about the Libyans and in Zimbabwe it is still not about Zimbabwean interests.
It is well documented that Zimbabwe is endowed with vast minerals.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has assessed that Zimbabwe is the richest country in terms of natural resources per person.

What is currently happening in Zimbabwe is a push towards a war to loot the country’s natural resources and leave Zimbabwe a destroyed state, just like Libya.

That is the real story behind these so-called demonstrations.


Labels: , , ,


Read more...

Friday, January 09, 2009

(HERALD) International Crisis Group dead wrong on Zimbabwe

International Crisis Group dead wrong on Zimbabwe
By John Dziva Kuvita

THE analysis of the Zimbabwe situation by the International Crisis Group, contained in Africa Briefing Number 56 issued in Pretoria and Brussels on December 16, 2008 is mind-boggling. ICG blames President Mugabe and Zanu-PF for all the problems facing Zimbabwe.

It claims that President Mugabe and Zanu-PF "stole elections, unleashed violence upon Zimbabweans, have run down the economy, have caused HIV and Aids, and caused cholera etc" — the list is endless. How on earth can the intellectuals and eminent persons in the ICG overlook the role and motives of Britain and the United States in Zimbabwe?

How can they fail to notice that these countries have systematically and relentlessly destabilised Zimbabwe since the advent of the land reforms in 1999? How can they fail to also condemn violence perpetrated by MDC-T led by Morgan Tsvangirai?

The so-called Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act authorises President George W. Bush and future US presidents "to provide support for independent and free Press and electronic media" and "to provide for democracy and governance programmes in Zimbabwe", among others.

This Act effectively disabled all lines of credit to Zimbabwe and prevents the "World" Bank and International Monetary Fund from providing any development assistance or support to Zimbabwe.

The motive of these sanctions should be known to the ICG.

In a 2005 testimony to a US Senate hearing on Zimbabwe, former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Chester Crocker had this to say: "To separate the Zimbabwean people from Zanu-PF, we are going to have to make their economy scream, and I hope you, senators, have the stomach for what you have to do."

This statement in itself confirms US complicity in economic destabilisation of Zimbabwe.

The European Union as a bloc and the British in particular have imposed a set of their own sanctions — targeted they call them.

How can the sanctions be called targeted to individuals when their effect discourages British companies and individuals from investing in Zimbabwe’s economy?

How can they be called targeted when the British government bans the delivery of aircraft and vehicle parts fully paid for by the Government of Zimbabwe?

Will Britain in future pay interest on the monies remitted by the Government of Zimbabwe for the spares?

Over the last eight years, hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent by the US, Britain and the EU bloc of nations to destabilise Zimbabwe.

On the ground, measures taken by the US, Britain and the EU translated into funding of anti-Government of Zimbabwe and Zanu-PF radio stations and newspapers, bankrolling the opposition MDC and inciting and urging Zimbabweans to vote against President Mugabe.

Quantified, all these punitive economic measures, destabilisation and huge funding for the opposition make violence inevitable.

Any economy subjected to such punitive measures would spiral into hyper-inflation, chaos and human suffering.

It is, therefore, not mismanagement, but external sabotage which is the main ingredient of the problems in Zimbabwe.

The notion that Zimbabweans are hapless victims of a power-hungry African dictator is a fairy tale sponsored by Washington and London to mask the crimes these countries are committing against the people of Zimbabwe.

The claims about non-existence of democracy and human rights violations in Zimbabwe being regurgitated by Western governments and institutions, the ICG, "humanitarian NGOs and independent journalists" (all paid by Washington and London) are a ploy designed to hoodwink their African and overseas audiences into missing the point about what this is all about, which is the ownership by Zimbabweans of their resources, including land.

If the West really cares about the suffering Zimbabweans, they would simply lift the sanctions.

The British, United States and the white Commonwealth governments MUST be charged with genocide over the death of over 1 000 Zimbabweans because of the cholera epidemic.

This call is predicated on the undeniable fact that these countries have in the past eight years imposed illegal economic sanctions that are affecting all facets of Zimbabwean society, thereby severely incapacitating Government’s ability to deal with outbreaks of epidemics.

These countries must stop forthwith covering their guilt.

Most Zimbabweans are clearly seeing the vicious assault on Zimbabwe aimed at effecting a coup against the elected Government of President Mugabe by whipping up people’s emotions on the cholera outbreak and instilling a sense in them that there is no government in Zimbabwe to address the impact of the epidemic.

If anything, the West is creating permanent enemies with the people of Zimbabwe because people of my generation will not forget the flagrant violation of our rights by the Western nations to economic prosperity and the denial of basic necessities because of the sanctions imposed by the West on our own God-given country.

The ICG also lacks in depth in its assessment of the political situation in Zimbabwe by misinterpreting the vote tally of the contesting political parties following last year’s harmonised elections.

The two MDCs are two different political parties with different leaders and party ideologies.

To try and create a single MDC is obviously an attempt to mislead the ICG audience that Zanu-PF lost the elections.

Tsvangirai led in the first round of the elections but failed to achieve the constitutional threshold to become President.

He chickened out of the run-off sensing defeat. MDC-T has only one Member of the House of Assembly more than Zanu-PF. MDC, which is a different political party, has 10.

So to try and create one political party out of the two factions is a betrayal of the truth.

Why does the ICG ignore the results of the Senate elections which Zanu-PF won, which also translate into a majority popular vote for Zanu-PF?

Be fair with your readers, please.

Perhaps there is need for the ICG to change its name to International Constructive Group if people of rational minds have to take the input of the organisation seriously, otherwise the International Crisis Group as presently constituted, and for its name sake, foments and provokes crises around the world.

Anyone who has had sight of Cde Thabo Mbeki’s letter of admonishment to Tsvangirai will see clearly that the latter does not care about ordinary Zimbabweans and is only interested in the blind pursuit of power, hence he is to blame for the problems bedevilling the country.

l John Dziva Kuvita is Harare-based researcher on African politics.

Labels: , ,


Read more...

Thursday, December 18, 2008

(TALKZIMBABWE) Sanctions unhelpful: ICG

Sanctions unhelpful: ICG
Ralph Mutema
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:01:00 +0000

THE global think tank, International Crisis Group, has dismissed the effectiveness of sanctions as a helpful tool in effecting change in Zimbabwe.

A report published by the group Wednesday entitled, “Ending Zimbabwe's Nightmare: A Possible Way Forward” concluded that sanctions imposed by the West and other forms of pressure are “unlikely to be productive in the absence of a new approach.”

The report comes on the heels of an announcement by Australia that it has imposed sanctions on four companies and 75 individuals linked to the Government of Zimbabwe.

The group also dismissed the effectiveness of military intervention to resolve the crisis in the country.

“Despite the calls increasingly being made for outright military intervention to resolve the crisis, this seems a wholly unrealistic option,” said the report adding that “regional resistance to any such course remains intense.”

The group suggested that a transitional administration in Zimbabwe was required in the country and should not be headed by President Mugabe or Morgan Tsvangirai of the MDC.

The call by ICG reflects an idea brooked by the leader of the Mavambo Project and former Finance Minister, Dr. Simba Makoni.

In the run-up to the run-off election of June 27, Dr. Makoni advised the MDC leader to negotiate a transitional government to rule the country for five years, rather than contest the run-off election – a suggestion dismissed by the Zanu PF party.

Sanctions against the ex-Finance Minister were lifted by the EU last week.

The report argued that the Global Political Agreement signed by Zanu PF and MDC on September 15 is unlikely to work because of the suspicion between the two parties. The reports further says the establishment of two power-centres suggested in the Agreement was unworkable giving the history of the relationship between the two parties.

“Even if the parties find a compromise on ministry allocation and related issues, the creation of two power centres by the GPA suggest that, in the context of their intense mutual distrust, political paralysis would prevent serious action to address the country’s problems,” read the report.

The report suggested that during the transitional period donors should “commit to give the transitional administration substantial support and, as the process consolidates, lift (the) sanctions.”

“The UN, AU, and SADC to identify senior officials to assist the transitional government and monitor cooperation,” added the report.

Labels: ,


Read more...

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Mugabe has the means to manipulate Zim polls, says ICG

Mugabe has the means to manipulate Zim polls, says ICG
By Kingsley Kaswende in Harare
Thursday March 27, 2008 [16:00]

The International Crisis Group (ICG) has asked the international community to prepare contingency plans in anticipation of rigged elections in Zimbabwe that could precipitate a potentially violent crisis. ICG Africa program director Francois Grignon said President Robert Mugabe had the means to manipulate the election process before, during and after balloting, sufficiently to keep his office though possibly only after a violent run-off.

"If the election leads to further confrontation, the African Union (AU) should be ready to promptly offer mediation for a power-sharing agreement to produce a transitional government with a reformist agenda," said Grignon in a statement issued three days before Zimbabwe's general elections tomorrow. "Zimbabweans desperately want change but have little faith these elections will produce it.

Even after the March 29 vote, a negotiated compromise will likely be essential to reverse a deteriorating political and economic situation but only as the first step." He said the SADC mediation by South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki, which once offered the most realistic chance of resolving Zimbabwe's eight-year crisis, had failed and, therefore, primary responsibility lay with President Mugabe who unilaterally called snap elections and ruled out passage before the polls of the new Constitution. Grignon said the ruling ZANU-PF had subsequently been using all the extensive means at its disposal to maintain an unfair advantage in the campaign.

He said in case of a potential power sharing agreement, a settlement would not necessarily need to remove Mugabe. "He might serve as a non-executive head of state during a transitional period in advance of fresh elections.

The important point is for the region to be prepared to act quickly if the elections do not produce a legitimate government that can deal with a national crisis whose consequences are increasingly being felt beyond Zimbabwe's borders. With South Africa and the SADC having lost some credibility, the AU needs to take the lead," stated Grignon. Grignon stated that the wider international community must also be ready to provide concerted backing to AU-led mediation.

Labels: , ,


Read more...