Sunday, March 09, 2008

LETTERS - Economic Empowerment,

Zambianise foreign investment
By Dr. Emmanuel Malabo Makasa
Sunday March 09, 2008 [03:00]

Allow me, through your distinguished newspaper, to call on all members of parliament in Zambia to consider introducing legislation that will ensure that Zambians are economically empowered as partners in businesses and not only as workers.

They should draft, debate and enact legislation that will require that foreign investment in the key areas of the economy such as mining, tourism, energy and telecommunication has a 15 per cent indigenous Zambian ownership.

This will not only enable us participate in our national economy but also ensure that we benefit more from our natural resources rather than relying only on employment.
Today Zambians are developing much resentment towards investors. They feel they are being robbed of their resources because they have not seen much benefit from this so-called investment. All they have are a few poorly paying casual jobs.

It is therefore of paramount importance and urgency that government deliberately empowers and involves its nationals in investments and development of the country for the sake of stability, national security and economic independence. We call upon all honourable members of parliament to start working on such legislation that will surely benefit the population they promised to represent and help develop our country.



http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=38796

Mugabe maize
By Raphael Mukuka
Sunday March 09, 2008 [03:00]

Mike Mulongoti must not speak in riddles when speaking on behalf of the government. What does he mean when he says that the delay to deliver the purchased maize to Zimbabwe is because of banking payments and logistical problems?

Politicians must learn to speak clearly so that we can support them if it’s worth supporting. He should have just said the government is waiting for the cheque to clear or our roads are impassable to collect maize, from the farmers which is mostly likely.

If Mugabe has paid for the maize, give it to him quickly otherwise we are just compounding the problems for our neighbouring country.
They have enough problems to attend to and we cannot allow ourselves to be part of the problems when they have in fact paid for the commodity and sent trucks to pick up the stock.

This incompetence is unexplainable and shameful. How do you accept someone’s money before you have sorted out the ‘logistical problems’ Mulongoti is referring to?

This is the same government that has on many occasions failed to collect maize in many rural areas and I wonder why they entered into a deal with Mugabe if they clearly lack the capacity to deliver the 150,000 tonnes of maize purchased.

If the government wants to inform the nation on such matters they should ask competent people in the right offices like the FRA to give proper statements unlike Mulongoti.


http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=38794

Income Tax Amendment
By Gady Mwamba Museka
Sunday March 09, 2008 [03:00]

It is very good to learn from The Post that the parliamentarian committee presented a report to the Speaker of the national

assembly, proposing an increase to the tax- free threshold on employees’ income from the proposed K600,000 to at least K1, 000, 000 (one million Kwacha).

This is in line with the research conducted by the Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection, on the essential food basket for a family of six in Lusaka, which stands at K 1,835,300.

The above costs of food coupled with rentals, school fees, transport , utility bills like water and electricity despite load shedding are very high as well. You will find that a family of six will need approximately 4 million Kwacha in order to pay for all the above bills.

Inasmuch as we all know that one of the sources of revenue collection for the government is through taxes from employees, it is inhuman to tax someone who gets one million kwacha as take home, because from the above analysis, such an employee cannot manage to pay for all the bills and buy food for a month!

Since the mining companies will be paying more in taxes, let the government listen to parliamentarians and increase the tax-free threshold to a million kwacha. It is a challenge to parliamentarians not to approve the proposed increase from K500,000 to K600,000. Twachula pafula!!


Labels: ,


Read more...

Friday, March 07, 2008

Parliament urges govt to increase tax threshold

Parliament urges govt to increase tax threshold
By Mutuna Chanda
Friday March 07, 2008 [03:00]

THE Parliamentary Committee on Estimates has described as inconceivable government’s proposal of K600,000 as tax threshold and proposed to have it increased to K1 million. And chairperson of the committee Godfrey Beene has expressed concern over the use of the anticipated income from the mining sector after the new tax regime is effected.

Presenting the committee’s report on the proposed Income Tax Amendment Bill of 2008 in which finance minister Ng’andu Magande proposed to increase the tax-free threshold on employees’ incomes from K500,000 to K600,000 and the new mining taxes in Parliament on Wednesday, Beene said the government seemed not to have a criteria on which to base the minimum taxable amount of workers’ incomes.

“Research Mr Speaker, shows that the essential food basket for a family of six in Lusaka currently stands at K1,835,300,” Beene said. “Your committee urges government to move an amendment so as to increase the threshold to at least K1 million.”
But Magande said while many people had advocated a higher increase in the tax threshold, this could not be achieved in a single year.

And Beene urged the government to consult stakeholders including members of parliament over the utilisation of the revenue from the mines.
“Mr Speaker while commending government for this initiative, your committee is concerned about the utilisation of the anticipated income from the mining sector especially that it is not provided for in the 2008 budget,” Beene said.

He however said the new tax regime on the mines should be implemented immediately.
And when the Value Added Tax (VAT) Bill came up for second reading, Beene recommended that the VAT rate be reduced to 14 per cent instead of the proposed 16 per cent.

The government in this year’s budget reduced Value Added Tax rate from 17.5 per cent to 16 per cent.

But Beene said reducing the VAT rate further to 14 per cent would discourage tax evasion, especially at border entry points.
The Customs and Excise Amendment Bill also came up for second reading.
All the three bills passed the second reading and come up today at committee stage.

Labels: , ,


Read more...