Tsvangirai and Mutambara's letter to President Zuma
Fri, 29 May 2009 02:27:00 +0000
THE following is a letter written by the Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Mutambara to South African President Jacob Zuma in which they ask him to help in resolving the "outstanding issues" in the implementation of the September 15 Global Political Agreement.
-----
Friday 29 May 2009
TO: The SADC Chairman - HE President Jacob Zuma
Cc: SADC Executive Secretary - Mr Augustos Salomao
African Union - c/o - Mr Jean Ping
The SADC Appointed Facilitator - Mr Thabo Mbeki
RE: UNRESOLVED ISSUES ON THE GLOBAL POLITICAL AGREEMENT
Your Excellence you will recall that an Extra-Ordinary Summit of the SADC Heads of State and Government met in Tshwane from the 26th to the 29th of January 2009.
That Summit, among other things, directed that the Parties to the Zimbabwe Global Political Agreement, signed on the 15th of September 2008, would inaugurate the Inclusive Government through the swearing-in of the Prime Minister and his Deputies and Ministers on the 11th and 13th of February 2009 respectively. The summit also directed that issues connected to the appointment of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Governor and the Attorney General be dealt with by the Inclusive Government after its formation.
In addition, the summit also directed that the Parties would negotiate on the formula for the appointment of Provincial Governors in a bid to pave way for the appointment of new Provincial Governors consistent with the composition of the Inclusive Government.
We regret to advise that despite innumerable meetings between the three Principals, the above issues remain unresolved. It would appear that on the part of Zanu PF the issue of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Governor and the Attorney General are no issues at all and thus not open for discussion.
With regard to the issues of Provincial Governors, although the Negotiators agreed on a formula, there is little progress in the implementation of the same and more importantly in ensuring that new Provincial Governors are appointed in terms of the agreed formula.
The failure to address the above issues is clearly affecting the credibility of the Inclusive Government. It is also causing great misapprehension in our respective political parties.
In terms of Article 22.6 of the GPA, the same shall be guaranteed and underwritten by SADC, the African Union and the Sadc-appointed Facilitator.
We thus write to you, in terms of the above provision, kindly requesting you to intercede in this matter to ensure that the above three matters are solved as a matter of urgency.
Your Excellency, kindly accept the assurances of our highest consideration and fraternal esteem.
Thank you,
Yours faithfully,
MORGAN R. TSVANGIRAI
MDC PRESIDENT
PROF. A.G.O MUTAMBARA
MDC PRESIDENT
Labels: ARTHUR MUTAMBARA, JACOB ZUMA, LETTERS, MORGAN TSVANGIRAI, NATIONAL UNITY GOVERNMENT
Read more...
Zambia's economic 'boom'
By Eugine
Thursday May 29, 2008 [04:00]
I have deliberately chosen to ignore what some economists preach about Zambia's good economic performance largely because to me, it does not translate into anything tangible. They say the kwacha is doing well against the US dollar, that our economy is doing fine (according to Chibamba Kanyama), that the political situation is stable (thanks to some reconciliation at higher level), the copper prices are good, and so on and so forth.
However, what I need these economists or anyone who understands these things to tell me is, with all these indicators, why would the price of a 2kg packet of sugar suddenly shoot up to K18,000, a 25kg bag of mealie-meal fetch K50,000? Why do we still have no cement on our market? Why would the price of stock feed go up in a country that has given priority to agriculture?
I will leave Rhodnie Sisala and Zesco's load shedding out of this for the time being. Why should all these and many other things be happening when we are told that Zambia's economy is doing well? The 5-6 per cent economic growth does not mean anything if my houseboy can't afford basic needs. What is going on? Somebody please explain!
This reminds me of Animal Farm. At some point in the book, the author, George Orwell, tells us how some inspectors went to the farm and were shown how full the food bins/barns were yet, in actual fact, there was sand underneath the food. The figures given were mere statistics while the animals kept starving. Is this what is happening in our country or am I misguided?
I would like to believe that our country is doing fine. But I would love it if our people enjoyed the economic boom.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=42145
High fuel prices
By Waziona Nkhwekwe Chirwa, Chongwe
Thursday May 29, 2008 [04:00]
Fuel is the lifeblood of any economy and without it, nothing or very little, will happen. The cost of fuel has a direct impact on the cost of other goods and services. It is for this reason that the government should do everything possible to reduce the rising fuel prices in the country.
I was delighted by the government's recent call for a probe into the high fuel prices by the Secretary to the Treasury, Evans Chibiliti. Though the probe is over 40 years behind schedule, it is nevertheless welcome.
It is a notorious fact that one of the major causes of Zambia having one of the most expensive fuel in the world are the heavy taxes levied on our fuel. The taxes applicable to petroleum products in Zambia include import duty, Value Added Tax (VAT) and excise duty.
Import duty at 5 per cent is charged both on petroleum feed stock (crude oil) and refined petroleum products that are imported in the country while excise duty is charged on fuel whether imported or produced locally. The following rates apply: (i) Petrol 60 per cent (ii) diesel 30 per cent.
In addition to the above very high excise duty on fuel, an additional 16 per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) is heaped on the fragile back of our fuel in Zambia.
As our able and competent Secretary to the Treasury constitutes the team to conduct a probe on why fuel prices are high in Zambia, he will do well to critically and honestly reflect on the impact of these clearly exorbitant taxes have on our fuel in Zambia .
Labels: ECONOMY, FUEL, INFLATION, LETTERS, NEOLIBERALISM
Read more...
This year’s budget
By Gift Hajongola
Friday January 18, 2008 [03:00]
Since independence, agricultural production has played a vital role in driving the economy of Zambia, but it appears
its sustenance, real meaningful advancement and growth both at household and national level is not forthcoming. Using the
constituency approach and
participatory methodology appears to be the only lasting solution to real agro-industrial development.
To support this suggestion, I have developed a document on the practical methodologies and structures of making agriculture a real business which can raise the living standards of the worst poverty-stricken people of the rural population.
It is very unfair that in rural areas, where there is plenty of rich and fertile land, 80 per cent of the people are poor. What really lacks is the structural system which can make these local people productive and drive their own production, processing and marketing.
Time has come when we need to make agriculture production a big business, not just a place of survival. As it is now, the rural people are deemed to be the poorest and socially excluded to serious financial allocation during budgeting and implementation of some projects. It is time to put development into the hands of the indigenous people so that they own the means of production and this starts at the point of budgeting.
There is also a need to reduce funding on service activities and increase fund allocation to production so that the production-based areas would in turn support the service delivery sectors .This is sustainable development. The formula is : the more the productive base is widened, the more the service base is widened as well.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=36454
Lack of planning
By Evans C.
Friday January 18, 2008 [03:00]
It is very sad and disappointing to look at how our country is being managed. It is management crisis every time!
We all knew well in advance that our country was going to experience serious floods this rainy season and yet no measures were put in place by the government to remedy the situation. People are now homeless with more expected to join the picture soon. Mind you, there is still damage to crops and hunger following this situation. When are we ever going to learn? Surely our leaders should wake up and start managing this country properly. Where are all the planners and advisors to the government tasked with managing these affairs?
I think it is very embarrassing for our leaders to start crying out for external assistance now that we have victims of these already predicted floods. It shows incompetence, lack of foresight and is typically African. We have a lot of high lying land and people should have been moved from flood-prone areas well before the rains began. Are we forever going to continue begging for outside help? Are we also going to ask for outsiders to repair our poorly constructed roads that are now collapsing because of the rains? Maybe we should also cry for external help to construct drainage systems in Lusaka.
Shame to all those officers and leaders who failed to plan for this catastrophe! Stop being ‘crying babies’ because you just failed to manage your country!
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=36401
Cost of living
By Evans C
Thursday January 17, 2008 [03:00]
Many people have talked about high taxes and the need to reduce them in Zambia. I also totally agree, especially when I look at the cost of most commodities in our country.
I don’t understand why beef, chicken and all other goods produced locally should be so expensive. These same commodities cost far less in neighbouring countries.
If our leaders are really serious about improving our welfare, let them work towards reducing the cost of living now. We are already earning very little money and yet this government expects us to survive on things we can’t even afford. People are stealing and engaging in corrupt activities so as to survive.
We are tired of hearing about the so-called economic boom because it means nothing to most of us ordinary people.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=36455
Scrap Youth Fund
By Ladislas Hibusu
Friday January 18, 2008 [03:00]
As the budget presentation approaches, there are many prospects and surprises to different departments and sectors. We will be stunned to the pronouncements of bulky achievements and hardly any failures that are so minute and unsubstantial. Amidst these pronouncements will be changes in the VAT system, there will be reductions and increments in allocation of funds in different sectors.
Certain sectors like local government that are very key to the growth of the nation are neglected, as such experiencing dire drainage systems. I strongly feel that more funds should be scrapped off and be allocated to sectors like local government for waste management and drainage systems. The drainage and sanitation systems in the country are porous right now. Visit Soweto, Misisi, Kanyama, Mtendere, and many other places, it’s a sorry sight. However, I feel it’s not entirely the government to blame for some of these ailments; residents are also partly to blame. Residents can come up with an initiative by making contributions and hire technocrats to amend the state of affairs.
Unless we are availed with an authentic financial report of the foresaid concern and unless some come out to confirm that they benefited, this fund is a non-starter and should not appear in the fourth coming budget or we enrich a few elite.
Perhaps it’s one of the ‘knit-bits’ to the vulture funds. Although this is a subjective view I strongly feel there are a lot more patriotic youths out there who have very realistic and farsighted objectives of expanding their projects, hence creating employment for the underprivileged.
Labels: 2008 BUDGET, LETTERS
Read more...
Economic growth
By Matipa Masuwa
Sunday December 23, 2007 [03:00]
Magande’s comments on Zambia’s economic growth made very sad reading, especially the confessions that ministries are not implementing government projects. He cited the US$ 10 million meant for the treatment of livestock diseases in Western Province, and the proposed 25 high schools across the country. Magande argued that “even if government increased the tax base in the mining sector, it would still be difficult to improve people’s lives unless the financial monitoring system was improved”.
First, project-based programmes have a high probability of succeeding if and when delivered through project management systems; because such systems tend to work with established linear management (hierarchical management structures, such as ministries), while striving to deliver specific client (or project sponsor) requirements.
A project environment is result-oriented, hence the management cost control system therein does not solely rely on ‘financial monitoring system’ as the minister argues, but on the oval earned value management system – which Ambassador Vigtel was referring to. Earned value management could incorporate a whole range of specialisations pertinent to the project at hand, of which finance is but one of the key drivers of the project.
Once results are met, the project team could be disbanded and moved on to other projects. As a project sponsor, the minister could have contracted or appointed an entity (person or firm) to hold accountable for the success and or failure of the project.
Had the minister taken such an approach, he could report on the project with ease because results speak for themselves. Failure could also be reported with ease because most contractual arrangements attract a penalty for failure.
Second, the minister shows how incompetent he has been at instituting financial monitoring systems, despite the country having highly qualified accountants. Instead of admitting his failure, he has embarked on a blame game – and, in my own view, the civil service is the softest target to patronise. Despite having some of the most qualified manpower, the civil service is constrained in a myriad of ways, especially the cadre mentality of the government.
For instance, if one does not agree with their line manager, such as a director of a department or a minister, s/he belongs to opposition. Meaning, civil servants go through motions as it were, just because they have families to feed. No ambition, no innovation, no creativity, and no nothing because all these essential attributes are never rewarded in the first place.
Third, failure to implement government programmes cannot be linked to the urgent need for the renegotiation of mineral royalties; as recently pointed out by a BBC documentary that indicated that Magande’s laissez faire approach to mineral rights was misplaced, and a huge cost to the Zambian people.
Lastly, it should be pointed out that implementation of projects is not rocket science and that Zambia has many qualified people to handle these problems.
The only problem is that politicians do not want to use these people when it matters most; although that is to be expected because politicians think every Zambian problem is better placed in their hands; hence discounting all the professions trained at a great cost to the tax payer.
Someone has to start a campaign to educate politicians on the need to consult specialists, be they academics or general consultants on matters of development. It is the most crucial factor in developing Zambia because many Zambians could freely contribute their knowledge while pursuing their livelihoods where ever they maybe.
Labels: GOVERNANCE, LETTERS
Read more...
We need another oil refinery
By Mubanga Luchembe, Lusaka
Sunday November 18, 2007 [04:00]
Recently, finance minister Ng’andu Magande held a press briefing on the recent fuel shortage to explain the President’s involvement in securing feedstock for Indeni using a named local bank and the Bank of Zambia.
The press briefing was aired on ZNBC TV. During the question and answer session, a young female journalist from the private media asked a very pertinent question on why the government cannot consider a long-term measure of setting up another oil refinery in Zambia to act as a backup to Indeni.
To my surprise, our Mr Know-It-All Minister of Finance told off the young lady for asking such a question. And he was fully supported by his counterpart Ken Konga from the Ministry of Energy.
Facts are that:
Indeni Refinery is too old. It was built in the sixties, meaning it is now over 40 years old. At the moment this refinery is literally limping, hence its frequent breakdowns and shut downs.
Zambia has an oil-rich neighbour - Angola. Simply constructing a pipeline like Tazama as a joint venture between the Zambian and Angolan governments can be a strategic link to feed the new refinary.
The back-up refinery can strategically be located in the North Western Province where mining and other development activities are currently taking place.
Oil marketing companies find it unprofitable to store 15 days strategic stock all the time, instead of selling the commodity to end-users.
The young journalist suggested a long-term plan because the apparent short-term measures our government is fond of always back-fire. Bwana Ministers please, learn to listen to other people's suggestions. No one has a monopoly of knowledge and wisdom. Remember the Bemba old adage: Munshebwa aile na mashinsha ku buko.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=34071
A Fuel crisis result of incompetence
By Dr F.A.S Banda,UK
Sunday November 18, 2007 [04:00]
Indeni Refinery has run out of fuel again. This is surely incompetence. Once may be forgivable, but making it a regular occurence is incompetence, period!
A country cannot run on an ad hoc basis where a strategic component of the economy like fuel (energy) is concerned. It is not only the issue of costs to the economy of not having reliable fuel supplies, but also the cost of shutting down a whole refinery and then restarting the operations once the crude oil is available.
For God's sake, how can you run a government like this?
Many people in the past have called for the whole process of crude oil acquisition to be moved out of the control of government bureaucrats into either an independent organisation that is autonomous.
Granted this is a vital component to a nation's economic livelihood and, of course, it may be argued that it even boarders on our nation's security. But so far, there has been no indication that the current setup is working.
Where you have the President overruling the people appointed and charged with the responsibility to purchase and distribute the commodity, there will still be no signs of any clear vision on a way forward.
Sticking to dogma for its sake and not being flexible and listening to what looks to be a tried and tested model in other countries sounds like a sure path to a repetition of this scenario.
And while we are grappling with the consequences of the high cost of energy from fossile fuels, I hope the government is looking beyond its tenure in office by researching. Yes I said researching, into alternative energy sources.
Forward-thinking countries started doing this ages ago. Unless this government is very sure they have "black gold" in North Western Province.
The fuel crisis is pathetic and an indictment on the MMD's modus operandi. The word failure springs to mind.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=34073
Be wary of global trade systems
By Kambafwile Pascal
Sunday November 18, 2007 [04:00]
The government needs to be very careful with international trade sytems. What is clear in many cases is that international trade systems and foreign investment discriminate against developing countries, and international divisions of labour exploit workers for profit.
It is so irrational and grossly ruinous to think that the destiny and development of this nation lies in the hands of investors, especially foreign investors, minus our serious, reasonable and realistic dialogue with them when it comes to business negotiations with them.
Let us all realise that development demands, above all, a spirit of initiative on the part of us who need it. If Tanzania has been that creative, what about Zambia? We need to realise that solidarity among us will call for greater cooperation and establishment of effective national development.
Labels: LETTERS
Read more...
Copper mining in Zambia
By Jenkins Chisoni
Sunday November 04, 2007 [03:00]
I wish to express my humble feelings about the report,"Undermining development, Copper Mining in Zambia" on which The Post editorial has commented very ably indeed. The history of the elusion of a 'Fair Share of the Cake' started in the 1960s with very noble ideas by and of the UNIP government to get a fair share for the Zambian people of the proceeds of the copper mining industry in our country, after gainining independence.
I will never forget how our founding father KK congratulated himself and his party with the statement, Nalo mali ena katina translated from Chilapalapa or Chikabanga to mean 'and the money is now ours'.
Did we really get the money for ourselves or a fair share then? The answer, emphatically, is no.
The reason is simply lack of capacity, on the part of the UNIP government, to negotiate effectively in the world of a sophisticated mining industry. UNIP had only the will and desire to transfer money quickly to the people so that they could see the fruits of independence.
The result was that Anglo American Corporation and Rhodesia Selection Trust came out winners. To add salt to injury for the Zambian mine workers, they lost equal pay for the same jobs done by their white counterparts as the mining companies negotiated for, by far, superior separate expatriate conditions of service for the white employees compaired to those of their Zambian counterparts doing the same jobs, giving the reason of retention of highly skilled labour force which was necessary for the survival of the industry until enough Zambians had received training and gained experience. This lie which has remained in existence to this day as I painfully try to contribute to the fair share debate.
A quick observation is that both the UNIP action and the current suggestion of renegotiation of agreements with the current mine owners happened and is happening respectively during the boom price of copper.
Edith Nawakwi's contribution in the struggle to have a good deal with the IMF and the World Bank was a good try from what we read. But it was not good enough to be able to get anything out of the powerful forces of the two bodies which even went as far as lying that 'not in Nawakwi's life-time would the price of copper change'.
That was a lie because the facts in the history of the industry, in our country and worldwide, totally disagreed. The world has always witnessed rises and falls of metal prices which have been brought about by most unpredictable factors. Nawakwi,with due respect to her economics knowledge which I don't have, was in a very weak position to argue for Zambia.
But what puzzles me is the fact that at the time of the negotiations there were enough qualified Zambian experts to call upon, unlike the UNIP time; did she consult any of them or did she rely on pseudo experts like we are witnessing today in the likes of George Mpombo advising the government on defence matters with no qualifications?
National natural resources given to us by God should be jelously guarded and used by all of us at the end of time, we shall be accountable for them to Him that gave them to us.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33509
Funding of political parties
By Jonathan Mumba
Sunday November 04, 2007 [03:00]
It is sad to hear the rumbling and threats coming out of the mouths of the so-called political leaders, it is not just immoral but pure childish by some of our leaders.
We all know that all Zambian political parties are funded by foreign interests for specific reasons, don’t tell me that MMD has never received money from foreign interests.
The fact is that they might have but they are not as transparent as PF. After all, they abuse state facilities as the case is in Nchanga at the moment. Stop being ‘clever’.
We know the sort of people you were a few years ago and who you are today. So don’t try to be champions of foreigners at the expense of the Zambian people whom you keep deceiving everyday.
The confrontational stance you have taken to attack anyone who differs with your ideas will haunt you after the political sand shifts from under your feet.
Zambia belongs to us all, not just to you people reigning now and enjoying the support of our people’s paper The Post. Everything coming out of your mouths is malicious why? Listen to the people, they put you there. If Sata is wrong, why are you threatening him? You are hiding something.
Zambians don’t hate Chinese but we don’t like the quality of their investiment. They can take it elsewhere as it does not add value to our lives but fatten pockets of their “supporters” and the corrupt.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33510
Constitution-making process
By M longoti
Sunday November 04, 2007 [03:00]
The introduction of NCC after the Willa Mung’omba’s CRC, which has just turned out to be a worst of taxpayers’ money and a hoax cannot go unchallenged.
According to the finance and national planning minister, One trillion kwacha has so far been spent on the CRC. Yet, we want to spend more on NCC.
As a nation and a people we have been talking about abuse of national resources and we wonder why this could not have been avoided. Given a good constitution, tell us why we cannot cite you the leadership for abuse of resources? Does this abuse come about when it is others involved and not the leadership?
As a nation why shouldn’t we demand that the leadership reimburses the nation of the money and funds that were spent on CRC as they knew very well that the CRC was not viable enough to facilitate constitution-making process!
The wantonness and extravagance with which the CRC was expedited cannot be forgiven. Yes you can have your NCC but it is only fair that the national resources spent on CRC be reversed. The CRC was a very expensive venture.
Abandoning it midstream shows how malicious and extravagant this nation has been in addressing real issues.
The Willa Mung’omba CRC expenses and allowances would have been spared if the leadership had a vision of what was to come. Or does it have the vision?
On the constitution that will stand the test of time, I doubt that; unless we remain static, there is no constitution that can be rigid with the global rising demands.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33464
Chinese global trade
By Dr Chewe Chabatama USA
Saturday November 03, 2007 [03:00]
I have been following the debate raging on the Chinese investors in Zambia, and it appears Zambians have not been following the debate on the shifting Chinese global trade activities from the developed world to the poor nations in Africa such as Zambia.
There has been ongoing interest in the US on why China has suddenly decided to shift to Africa. And this is an area I feel Zambians and Africans should try to come to grips with, not name-calling, insults and intimidation from Mpombo.
Why has China suddenly become Africa-friendly in trade? The Zambian government and other African governments are supposed to ask themselves this question and find an answer. We have "experts" in the Zambian government who are well paid to monitor things of this nature.
But given the mediocrity of our Zambian and African politicians, they cannot discern this. And if they knew, they would not want to talk about it because they do not care about the welfare of the people they govern. Their newfound pampered lifestyle and their gratuity matter more than people's welfare.
The reason China has suddenly become Africa and Zambia-friendly is simple. China wants to create a new market for its products in Africa. China is quickly losing its American market as most products from China, especially food and toys have been declared dangerous in the US.
Right now toys from China are being removed from shelves in the shops because they are a danger to the health of American children. Last month a Chinese owner of one of the companies that makes the toys, which have been removed from shelves, committed suicide because of the losses he anticipated.
Some states in the US have actually declared that they will inform the Chinese manufacturers to start labelling their products very conspicuously so that buyers can make their choice whether to buy them or not.
Other states in the USA have declared they will not allow Chinese products in their shops. We Zambians must know what is good and what is not good for us. We cannot accept anything from outside just because we are poor. That is outrageous. I want us Zambians to start charting our destiny.
Labels: LETTERS
Read more...
Economic development
By Vincent Syanungu
Friday November 02, 2007 [03:00]
The state of our nation is a crisis. Only about 14 per cent are feeling the effects of this so-called economic development and these are the only people driving the economy. About 86 per cent of Zambians are impoverished and the government does not have any policies or plans to help reach the poor in the country.
The new deal government is focusing too much on economic development like reducing inflation rate to 5 per cent and increasing GDP to 7 per cent but they are not addressing the real issues affecting the poor people.
The government should come up with strategic plans to integrate the poor in the development of our country.
Neglecting of poor people has led to loss of trust and confidence in the current government.
The government should understand that what is dragging our economy backwards is the biggest base of poor people. I urge the President to help the poor like those from Mazyopa compound.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33464
Chinese global trade
By Dr Chewe Chabatama USA
Saturday November 03, 2007 [03:00]
I have been following the debate raging on the Chinese investors in Zambia, and it appears Zambians have not been following the debate on the shifting Chinese global trade activities from the developed world to the poor nations in Africa such as Zambia.
There has been ongoing interest in the US on why China has suddenly decided to shift to Africa. And this is an area I feel Zambians and Africans should try to come to grips with, not name-calling, insults and intimidation from Mpombo.
Why has China suddenly become Africa-friendly in trade? The Zambian government and other African governments are supposed to ask themselves this question and find an answer. We have "experts" in the Zambian government who are well paid to monitor things of this nature. But given the mediocrity of our Zambian and African politicians, they cannot discern this. And if they knew, they would not want to talk about it because they do not care about the welfare of the people they govern. Their newfound pampered lifestyle and their gratuity matter more than people's welfare.
The reason China has suddenly become Africa and Zambia-friendly is simple. China wants to create a new market for its products in Africa. China is quickly losing its American market as most products from China, especially food and toys have been declared dangerous in the US.
Right now toys from China are being removed from shelves in the shops because they are a danger to the health of American children. Last month a Chinese owner of one of the companies that makes the toys, which have been removed from shelves, committed suicide because of the losses he anticipated.
Some states in the US have actually declared that they will inform the Chinese manufacturers to start labelling their products very conspicuously so that buyers can make their choice whether to buy them or not.
Other states in the USA have declared they will not allow Chinese products in their shops. We Zambians must know what is good and what is not good for us. We cannot accept anything from outside just because we are poor. That is outrageous. I want us Zambians to start charting our destiny.
Labels: LETTERS
Read more...
Leaders without a vision
By Saka Sokontwe, Lusaka
Wednesday October 31, 2007 [03:00]
What do you think is the most difficult challenge facing Zambia 43 years after getting its independence?
The most critical problem facing Zambia today is the leadership vacuum that grew from the time MMD came into power.
It is during the MMD era that our beloved country has become like a ship whose captain cannot safely bring it to the shore and to make matters worse, the captain has engaged the services of pilots who do not know the local waters well.
I firmly believe that most of the problems we are experiencing rise and fall on leadership.
The invaluable expertise of a leader in any country, group or organisation more than anything else will determine its success or failure.
The impact of leadership is seen even in ancient Israel, where all was well with the nation when they had a good leader. When they had a bad leader, things went wrong for everyone.
The conclusion is that Zambia has been put in a quagmire by people who aspire for leadership without a vision on how best to serve this great nation.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33348
Mining investors
By Mwenya M
Wednesday October 31, 2007 [03:00]
Zambians of goodwill need to support the government's efforts to renegotiate the mining contracts in Zambia. For too long these investors have been getting away with huge profits in their pockets. It is time to get substantial revenue from these corporations.
As if that were not bad enough, these mining investors do not even respect Zambia's labour and environmental standards.
Investment is not a licence to steal and exploit other people. Zambia must welcome only responsible investors who pay a fair tax to the government and are able to promote social development in communities.
As for the government, you were not truthful enough to tell the people of Zambia the cost of selling the mines.
The people sacrificed social and economic benefits to allow MMD to sell the mines to foreigners. You have a chance now to set the record straight and let the mineral wealth be of benefit to Zambians.
Profits from the mineral wealth are not benefiting Zambians but investors who cannot even enlist on the Lusaka Stock Exchange. Why are these investors not giving back to Zambia's economy?
Today, a Vedanta University is being constructed in Orissa, eastern India, and will host a 1600 bed medical teaching hospital and several world-class faculty schools; with a $1 billion donation from an affiliated “foundation” of Vedanta Mining Investments. This is a largest-ever single donation to a university.
Why not invest in the same manner in Zambia where the funds are coming from? Soon our graduates will be replaced by Vedanta University graduate professionals in the mining sector, hence increasing the unempolyment levels. Let's renegotiate to get a fair deal on the mining sector.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33310
Chinese investment
By Isaac Makashini USA
Tuesday October 30, 2007 [03:01]
It is not surprising that once again the issue of Chinese investors in Zambia has come to the fore over the last few days.
Despite all the political calisthenics that Michael Sata is known for, I think one thing he has been consistent on is to keep his axe sharp to bring down the rising forest of Chinese monopoly in the Zambian economy.
Whether for good or ill motives, no politician has blown the whistle more loudly than Sata has done to expose the numerous fouls committed by our economic partners from the Far East.
Before we dismiss Sata’s concerns as the rantings of a man selfishly wanting to cash in on this volatile matter, we must pause and ask ourselves whether there is no merit in some of the issues which he has persistently raised.
It is not a secret that the Chinese investors’ treatment of our local people in these industries is inhuman, to say the least. Even the government has admitted this.
While we need Chinese investment in our country, we must not give a deaf ear to the serious labour miscarriages our “all-weather friend” has continued to commit with impunity.
I think we need to sit down and ask ourselves what cumulative benefits for the future of our country we are reaping from this one-legged economic partnership with China.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33344
Self-reliance
By Mwanza Mathias, UNZA
Wednesday October 31, 2007 [03:00]
I hereby commend The Post for its relentless fight towards good governance and better life for every Zambian. We have heard the saying "Life begins at forty." Going by this saying, Zambia would be said to be 3 years old. Alas, 43 years after independence, Zambia is no longer a youth. It’s sad Zambia can only pride in past glory of once having had one of the strongest economies in Africa. Where did we go wrong?
Independence is about freedom. Freedom entails being self-sufficient, self-reliant and having direction.
Freedom is about being able to make choices in your best interest as a nation and thus being responsible for those choices. Peace is sustainable. Freedom is about every citizen being able to voice out and be heard. The feeling of partnership creates the spirit of responsibility in every citizen.
Our freedom fighters had the role of seeing us liberated and our role and challenge is to sustain the unity, peace and realisation the vision of our forefathers, who foresaw a self-sufficient Zambia with social, academic, religious and economic freedom.
As we celebrate, let’s revisit our policies such as mining agreements and investment policies, where most Zambians will be able to set up enterprises and employee fellow Zambians, where Zambia's potential of becoming a manufacturing nation is realised, putting to use its vast natural resources and realising its role among great exporting African nations, hence reducing poverty levels.
We may have diverse political, religious and ethnic interests but we are one Zambia and one nation above everything else. Even a good, sustainable constitution is possible when we all forego individual interests and put Zambia first. Happy 43rd independence anniversary Zambia and God bless!
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33347
Improve drainage systems
By John Milimo, Lusaka
Wednesday October 31, 2007 [03:00]
As we approach the rainy reason, let us not forget that we have a problem of drainage systems in many parts of our country. Before it is too late, let us start doing something constructive in order to improve our drainage systems.
As we all know, our government is very slow in answering people's requests.
Let us therefore start doing something in our small little ways to improve our drainage systems, because it is we that will suffer unnecessary floods, which are likely to lead to the out-break of water-borne diseases like cholera.
To protect ourselves from such diseases and unnecessary inconveniences, let us therefore attend to our drainage systems adequately.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33308
Bush's remarks on Fidel
By Prince Bill M. Kaping’a Kitwe
Tuesday October 30, 2007 [03:00]
Cuban leader Fidel Castro has been away from the public eye since July, 2006. This is the day that he officially transferred power to his younger brother Raul Castro, who is also that country’s defence minister.
This was precipitated by Castro’s ill-health. In apparent reference to this, United States President George W. Bush rumbled in his recent address to Cuban dissidents in Miami, and I quote: “The long rule of cruel dictator Castro is nearing its end!” This comes hot on the heels of similar remarks he made earlier before the United Nations General Assembly in New York, a move that prompted Cuban foreign minister Felipe Perez Rogue to walk out in protest.
Isn’t the current US President a devout born-again Christian or so we are told? But contrary to the norms and ethics of Christianity, Bush’s heart seems to be so pregnant with immense hatred for one Fidel Castro that his belief and earnest prayer is seemingly that the rightful place for Fidel is the grave. What sort of Christian is Bush?
According to the Bible that I know and read, vengeance belongs to the Lord our God alone.
The same Bible further teaches us to “Love your enemies, do good to them, lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked.
Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.” (Luke 6:35) Where does Bush’s mercifulness stand as the Bible clearly commands? Why should he be pronouncing doom on Fidel for whatever reasons if he is indeed a true Christian?
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33309
Too much freedom
By Gabby GP,Kabwe
Tuesday October 30, 2007 [03:00]
As Zambia celebrates its 43 years of independence, we need to ask ourselves serious questions about our past, present and future.
We may boast of 43 years of political independence, yet we are nowhere close to economic independence.
I may sound rhetorical that part of that independence is locked up in part three of our Constitution called the Bill of Rights, it’s locked up with our leaders that hog decision-making positions and jobs that would otherwise be handed down to the young and vibrant generation for continuity and fresh ideas.
It’s locked up in our ability to make some bold decisions such as simply revising the mineral rights currently at play in our mining sector.
Conversely, too much independence has seen our underage youth start hanging out in clubs and nightclubs, and nobody seems to care. Our future hangs in the balance as young people not only need the recognition due to them but also a firm policy and monitoring system that keeps them away from self-destruction.
If this independence commemoration were to carry meaning, somebody must be silent no more; somebody must cry out and spare not, before our nation goes to the dogs.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33313
Leadership
By Dr Henry Ilunga Kasongo Mongu
Tuesday October 30, 2007 [03:00]
Leadership is defined as the qualities and skills of a good leader; and those qualities are respect for others, humility, moderation of language, honesty, integrity, selflessness, transparency and accountability.
Anyone who aspires to a leadership position must have these qualities. It is for this reason that I agree with Father Bwalya who stated in the Sunday Post of October 28 that Sata’s action raises a lot questions , and he insisted that the Zambian public should not take such conduct lightly, especially that it concerns a man who has attempted to occupy the highest office in our land.
However, I do not agree that it is the responsibility of the public to make their leaders accountable as Father Bwalya wants us to believe; politicians and other leaders must be honest, responsible, transparent and accountable by virtue of their position.
The onus of the public lies in the power they have when choosing or voting for their leaders. They should not vote for non-performers or people who are selfish, unpatriotic and not accountable.
Coming back to the case of Sata, we hope that the Patriotic Front leadership will humbly explain to the Zambian people the nature of the dealings it has with Taiwan.
Sata and Dr Guy Scott should also explain why Sata lied in his attempt to obtain money from the Taiwanese government, and why such a big amount as 50,000 dollars was to be deposited in Sata’s personal account. Are they (Sata and Guy) trying to say PF has no account, and all the money it receives from local and international friends comes through Sata’s account? Not doing so would be a serious blow to Zambia’s growing multipartism and to the Patriotic Front as a party.
The silence from the people of Zambia on Sata’s scam does not mean they condone his activities; it is on the contrary a display of maturity, wisdom and strength.
There is an African proverb which suggests that a man who, after seeing a naked mad person on the street, decides - out of pity and sympathy - to cover the mad man’s nakedness should first secure his own wrapper; otherwise he may cause a shame of himself if it falls off while he struggles with the lunatic, making passers-by mistake him to be mad too.
The silence of the Zambian people means a meditation on the country’s type of leadership, in this case PF, and a sober preparation for 2011, when the people of Zambia will vote wisely. They will vote for a leader - not a trickster.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=33340
Let's dialogue on NCC
By Charles Chunda Ngosa
Wednesday October 31, 2007 [03:00]
The most reasonable thing we can do is to put our heads together as far as the National Constitutional Conference is concerned and agree upon resolving anomalies our country is besieged with.
We are quarrelling as Zambians but other nations are busy sweeping money away from our country at an alarming rate. As Zambians, let's come together and make our economy fool-proof. We are just a laughing stock in the eyes of the international community.
Our country is one of the richest nations with a semi-developed infrastructure. Zambians are intelligent people who can be anything in the world.
The problem is we are not objective, focused and foresighted but are busy crying that we are poor.
Changing the party is not a solution to the problem of abject poverty and others but a good mindset is. Zambia needs attitude revolution.
Running up and down going to different nations to discuss investors is not a solution of wanting leadership. If one is to win confidence of the people, he/she should stay around with the people he/she claims to love, highlight their problems and offer solutions.
Foreigners who have come to Zambia cannot outwit us and go on doing things the way they like.
Labels: INDEPENDENCE, LEADERSHIP, LETTERS
Read more...
Accountability
By Concerned citizen
Wednesday October 17, 2007 [04:00]
Among numerous problems plaguing our Zambian governing system is the lack of proper checks and balances between the legislature and the executive. This problem is well highlighted by the provision in the law allowing the Minister of Finance and National Planning to acquire large debts without getting checked by parliament.
Supposedly, these ‘technocrats’ in the executive are competent enough to make decisions meant to benefit the citizens of Zambia. However, the citizenry must be given the opportunity to evaluate the neccessity and understand the magnitude of the loans the government acquires.
If the people have the opportunity to approve expenditure through the national budget presented to parliament, then we also deserve to be aware of the origin of the money being borrowed. After all, parliament exists to represent the paramount authority of our democracy, the citizens.
The perception that input from the citizens through parliament would hamper the process of acquiring debt is justifiable.
However, the inconvinience of delaying the acquisition of loans due to the people’s input pales in comparison with the possible future burden of Zambia being, yet again, at the mercy of foreign profiteers and opportunists.
Regarding large sums of money, the Zambian citizens, who ultimately will be responsible for the debt, have a right to examine the terms, conditions, and intended use of the loans the government acquires.
This can only be effectively done through our representatives in parliament. Hence the need for proper checks between the executive and the citizen-elected parliamentarians.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32832
Politics of bootlicking
By Jenkins Chisoni Glasgow
Thursday October 18, 2007 [04:00]
It is not my intention to seem to defend Brigadier General Miyanda in my submission as he is a very capable self-defender, but I certainly cannot keep quiet about ‘muzungu wanga anikonde’ politics of the likes of George Mpombo.
Surely, who can speak better for himself than the President himself on matters he tells the nation? Does he need the services of ministers like George Mpombo to clarify his feelings and expresions?
Mpombo does not need to explain to us in the whole nation what the President meant in his speech. We all got the message and Miyanda simply reacted just like all of us are doing including KK’s reaction on Monday.
George Mpombo has no right to call any of us malicious. He should keep ‘muzungu wanga’ politics and his kneeling before Levy to himself and leave us, the rest of citizens, alone to talk to our President in our own ways. It is our right to talk to our President without uninvited third parties like Mpombo.
The President does not need any defending by his ministers on matters he has directly told the whole nation. We want to know how we shall be committing treason if we say or react on the new NCC law simply because it has become law. How malicious is that, Mpombo?
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32895
Exaggerated respect
By Keith Matwi
Friday October 19, 2007 [04:00]
I have decided to write this letter because this is the second time I have seen defence minister George Mpombo on his knees while talking to the President.
To show respect does not mean we must crawl or kneel or even prostrate ourselves before our President. We can kneel before a chief as required by our traditions and customs but certainly not before the Head of State who is not a monarch.
Mpombo should realise that he is the de facto number two in the country by virtue of the sensitivity, strategic and importance of the portfolio he holds.
He must learn to stand or sit shoulder to shoulder with the Head of State and discuss matters of national security on a man-to-man basis. Crawling, kneeling, prostrating and showing humility will not buy the President’s trust.
Telling him the truth without hiding anything is what will help Levy run this country effectively and this should be done respectfully because he is our Head of State and is older than a good number of us.
In short, I am advising our Vice-President, ministers, members of parliament and defence chiefs not to exaggerate their respect for the President by kneeling before him, which he might not even be interested in.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32894
Higher education
By George Makubalo, South Africa
Friday October 19, 2007 [04:00]
My comments are prompted by what I perceive to be a continuous marginalisation of higher education on the list of the country's priorities. While others may argue to the contrary, evidence shows that higher education continues to be seen as a luxury, or something that can be taken away with no repercussions on society.
Studies have shown a close correlation between high level skills, productivity and growth in national economies. Whilst other countries are doubling their efforts in growing the skills base, Zambia is seemingly stashing away talent by under-funding higher education and continually disrupting learning cycles: The continuing closure of the Copperbelt University being a very immediate case.
These closures of universities cannot go on unabated. In the past three years I have worked for three universities in South Africa where student protests and labour disputes also take place.
However, closing institutions because of a strike is not seen as a way out. I think this is because people rightly believe that the closure of an institution does not make the problem disappear.
However, in Zambia there is a different logic in times of crisis: closure of universities is what comes first to the minds of government functionaries and university administrators.
In my view this hastiness to close universities is chiefly motivated by one factor: money.
Closing a university, I suspect, means millions will be diverted to inconsequential political events such as hosting the SADC heads of state summits, or indeed theatrical ventures such as the now infamous NCC.
Without seeming to be an alarmist, I believe national survival depends on getting national priorities right. If nothing drastic is done, what will happen in the future, and signs are already there, is that foreigners will be running the country because there are no skilled people.
Newspapers in South Africa and Australia are replete with adverts for jobs in Zambia to work on the mines and other crucial sectors of the economy because there are supposedly no qualified people in Zambia to occupy those positions.
The nation needs to engage some serious soul-searching as to the place of higher education in society. There is a serious need to re-read the commitments that were made by the country's founding fathers (and mothers) when the Uinversity of Zambia was being established in the 1960s.
There is a serious need to put higher education high up the national agenda or else the promise of development and prosperity in this age will remain illusory.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32813
Musosha's utterances
By Hilary Mulenga Jr, Lusaka
Wednesday October 17, 2007 [04:00]
I want to urge PF’s Given Lubinda not to give up in fighting for what is right despite unfortunate attacks from people like Musosha.
Indeed, the nation sees where Lubinda stands as a beacon of hope and an icon of patriotism. Lubinda has always transcended politics of personal gain and it is no wonder that selfish politicians like Musosha will do everything to shut him up.
Musosha’s utterances are misplaced because they are coming from a senior member of government who should have thought first before he made his pronouncements.
One wonders what is wrong with our leaders because they seem to think after they speak. Besides, the threats border on personal grudges that are irrelevant to the corruption allegations.
The issue at hand is that Musosha, like any other person, is not immune to investigations especially abuse of authority of office . His government is always at pains trying to make us understand that it is not selective when it comes to fighting corruption.
In fact, he should be happy that Lubinda is suggesting to him a golden opportunity to wash his hands clean and save his government from shame.
Musosha should not hold any hatred against Lubinda. Let him take a leaf from Lubinda‘s political smartness so far. Let him reserve those punches for a lesson from Lubinda. I am sure many people will agree with me that Musosha has a lot to learn from Lubinda on how he should conduct himself in politics.
Lubinda, unlike Musosha, has always been selfless. He has stood by his principles through and through. I am sure any sensible person would surely learn from such a man, instead of showering unnecessary insults on him.
As for Lubinda, the nation is there to see how he has ‘Given’ himself to the people. I trust that he will not be deterred by cheap politicians whose interests are their own. Let Lubinda ‘bark’ if that is what it takes to protect Zambia from selfish leaders.
Labels: CHRISPINE MUSOSHA, LETTERS, PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
Read more...
Who is a true Zambian?
By Jenkins Chisoni Glasgow
Monday October 15, 2007 [04:00]
The issue of who is a true Zambian and who isn't has been shied away from public discussion for a very long time in our country and since the subject has resurfaced through none other than the chairman of the ruling MMD, I would like to ask Michael Mabenga to define who qualifies to be called a true Zambian and whom, specifically, he was referring to as "foreigners bent on destabilising national peace".
Some politicians have a tendency of using divide and rule tactics when it suits them, which are usually detrimental to peace in the country. When it suits Mabenga to say something about the ongoing constitution-making process and the NCC, instead of making real contributions, he decides to eliminate some legitmate Zambians as ‘foreigners’ so that they can shut up.
When it suited Chiluba at the the Mutomboko ceremony during his first term as president, he announced to the nation "Never again shall Zambia be ruled by a foreigner". This Chiluba said with pomp and impunity, without any regard to his own dubious parentage, as long as he had said something to disparage or eliminate his arch enemy Kenneth Kaunda politically.
Examples of misuse of tribe to gain political mileage gain are innumerable, especially by those who percieve themselves as coming from very big influencial tribes.
This is all very wrong as it does not help to build our "One Zambia, one nation" motto.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32709
Levy and NCC
By Ngoshe, Ndola
Monday October 15, 2007 [04:00]
I wish to throw all my weight in support of Brig Gen Miyanda's response to Sangwa's articles. I have been in the middle all along regarding the impasse on the NCC debate.
I was not sure whether those calling for a boycott had a valid point to stay away but now I see the reasons. I think those independent institutions who have boarded the NCC wagon and hope that they will take unsettled issues to conference will have a shock of their lives (that is if they mean well on the unsettled issues otherwise they are just interested in allowances). Why are they going to be shocked?
1. The issue on numbers cannot be tabled before the NCC hence the goverment and its allies will be in greater majority. Any issue that is not agreed by general consesus will be subject to a vote and we know what that means.
2. Going by the President's recent threats, I do not see any member from government institutions and departments raising strong views against the government's position in the conference. Remember the OP will be present and therefore these members would be intimidated, more so if our 'changed' doctor will be in the house.
We should not leave things to chance just because voting will be through a ballot. Before the NCC is convened, every stakeholder should be comfortable with numbers they go along with.
The goverment should be more accomodating instead of threatening everyone who challenges them with valid points for consideration. They should open up and dialogue with other stakeholders opposed to the NCC for the better Zambia. The constitution should be embraced by all stakeholders and citizens of this great Republic, not just the politicians.
I would like to see a final debate on NCC on ZNBC featuring Brig Gen Miyanda, Fr Frank Bwalya, John Sangwa, Mike Mulongoti and Wila Mung'omba.
I was blind but now I see what the government is up to. Viva democracy, not dictatorship.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32708
Mabenga’s outburst
By L. Phiri
Monday October 15, 2007 [04:00]
The statement by Mabenga that a few people who are against the NCC are foreigners bent on destabilising the national peace cannot go without a comment.
First, Mabenga be assured we are not few. If anything we outnumber you and your party MMD.
Second, who is destabilising the country; yourself for those charges levelled against you in the courts of law or someone who is genuinely criticising your NCC?
It is better for people like you to keep quiet and ask for forgivenss from the people of Zambia for what you have done.
Don't just speak to impress your master. Remember that one day, the will of the people will prevail.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32655
Levy should apologise
By BC
Sunday October 14, 2007 [04:00]
May I please advise our President to apologise over his utterances upon arrival from the US.
I was very much surprised to hear Levy's threats on any Zambian who questions the NCC process.
There is no way a well- respected superior like Levy coming from US only with threats, is that what he meant by saying that 'he had come back a changed person?'
Please Levy apologise for your remarks because you were wrong, this is a democractic nation and this country and all the citizens do not belong to you!
Labels: LETTERS, NCC
Read more...
Business management
By Murray Sanderson
Friday October 12, 2007 [04:00]
It is wrong to blame our politicians and civil servants for messing up fuel supplies and disrupting the economy. Why do I say this? Because government servants lack business training and expertise, so they are bound to make mistakes. What is wrong is not their mishandling of matters affecting vital fuel supplies, but that they handling them at all.
It is often said that the governments must manage certain key sectors of the economy. This has been said at one time or another of agricultural inputs, banking, maize marketing, mining, railways and the supply of electricity and petroleum products.
All these areas of economic activity are commonly termed 'strategic', and must therefore be managed and controlled by the government.
In reality, however, the strategic nature of these industrial activities is the very reason why governments should NOT attempt to run them, but should leave that task to professionally competent managers.
These vital business organisations are then likely to be efficient and well-financed partners in the nation's economy.
As such, they will contribute greatly to economic growth, and will probably make substantial pre-tax profits, instead of hindering economic development and running up huge hidden losses.
In the unlikely event of large private sector businesses making losses, these will be borne by their own shareholders, not by the Zambian taxpayer.
How much more loss and dislocation will Zambians have to put up with before we acknowledge that 'strategic' industries should not be run by governments, but by independent and professional businesses?
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32532
Fuel shortage
By Collen Zulu Ndola
Thursday October 11, 2007 [04:00]
I wish to add my comments on the shortage of fuel that the country is currently going through. It seems that we (Zambians) are good at formulating polices but find it hard to implement or do not understand what we are trying to do. The country shouldn’t be experiencing fuel shortage with the strategic reserve fund.
The lame explanation by ERB that this fund has helped to stabilise fuel prices through subsidies is not welcome. Then call the strategic reserve fund as 'price stabilisation fund'. Some non-oil producing developed and developing countries are talking of over 20 years of fuel stocks.
We are not asking for 20 years. That will be too much. But being assured that the nation would have stocks for two weeks after a looming shortage is not good for us at all.
One wonders what statistics are used to arrive at this because the demand for fuel is increasing by the day, considering that we are importing thousands of vehicles per month.
With the strategic reserve fund, we SHOULD and MUST move away from two weeks to at least six months, one year and so on (of fuel stocks) as we accumulate more and more reserves.
We have a lot of land, some of which can be turned into “oil fields” while utilising the strategic reserve fund. And that can be a strategy!
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32590
Threats in a democracy
By Ba Biggy
Friday October 12, 2007 [04:00]
I wish to make a comment on the threats that our respected and highly placed President has issued to those he thinks are fighting the government over the NCC.
Are they really fighting the government?
In my view and conviction, what The Post newspaper has been saying about Levy's idea as the one to give the nation the constitution has clearly come out.
He sees it as his government’s duty to give the people a constitution and thus he is prepared to fight whoever is opposed to it.
Let the entire nation, of course with the exception of Levy’s minions, make it clear to Mwanawasa that this is not his duty because the costitution is not about what the government in power thinks but what the people want. Shame on you Levy! You seem to have forgotten that this is a democratic country.
Are you a dictator? As far as I am concerned, you are wrong! If you can now threaten anyone who questions the credibility of your government policies, then you are. Come on, be democratic.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32595
Levy and treason
By Concerned citizen
Friday October 12, 2007 [04:00]
“I have come back a changed person.
Let me hear no more nonsense bordering on malice, they are going to be arrested and charged with treason, and bail is not available to treason.”
Power intoxicates, and when you are intoxicated with power, you really are. Mwanawasa was just waiting for the NCC Act to be law and any opposing view is treason.
Twaafwa fwe balefwaya full participation.
It is under Mwanawasa where treason has easily been committed yet no arrests. Lawyer wa ma lawyer, now doctor in law, has blown it again.
Mwanawasa should know that dissenting views are not treason but a democratic right. He is just wasting people’s time by uttering such statements.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32591
Education impasse
By FarmerGwembe
Friday October 12, 2007 [04:00]
First, allow me to thank The Post for being impartial in their reporting.
Congratulations too to Dr Levy Mwanawasa for the honour bestowed on him by Harding University of the USA. With regard to the closure of CBU, I would like to state that the government has failed to show any political will.
This clearly indicates that the government has no regard for education. I wonder whether this millennium development goal will be achieved.
It is undisputed fact that every Zambian knows what transpired at CBU. All press statements were released to use students as scapegoats.
As a parent and a farmer who toils to generate additional money for my boy, and like many other parents, we cannot afford to see our children suffer in silence. I would also like to read about my son boast about having graduated with a merit.
Therefore I appeal to Mwanawasa to intervene in this matter. I want to remind all government officials that they are in the comfort zone today but it will not be forever.
Just because you can manage to send your children abroad does not mean you should neglect our children. We put you where you are to do what is best for us.
I know that the new deal government cannot let us down now by remaining mute on the matter. Mwanawasa, help us reopen CBU.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32595
Levy and treason
By Concerned citizen
Friday October 12, 2007 [04:00]
“I have come back a changed person.
Let me hear no more nonsense bordering on malice, they are going to be arrested and charged with treason, and bail is not available to treason.”
Power intoxicates, and when you are intoxicated with power, you really are. Mwanawasa was just waiting for the NCC Act to be law and any opposing view is treason.
Twaafwa fwe balefwaya full participation.
It is under Mwanawasa where treason has easily been committed yet no arrests. Lawyer wa ma lawyer, now doctor in law, has blown it again.
Mwanawasa should know that dissenting views are not treason but a democratic right. He is just wasting people’s time by uttering such statements.
Labels: LETTERS
Read more...
Levy, the changed man
By Dr Daniel Maswahu Cambridge, UK
Thursday October 11, 2007 [04:00]
So President Mwanawasa has declared that he is a changed man after returning from New York. I can only make an intelligent guess as to the sort of 'Damascus' experience Mwanawasa had while in New York, but there is no speculation involved in telling that whatever happened there has clouded his discernment of the difference between sedition and treason.
I will, however, not bore anyone by explaining the difference.
Mwanawasa's new academic title may perhaps have somehow clouded this simple distinction that is very clear to any first-year law student but the over-zealousness to deliver a punishment that far outweighs the alleged crime remarkably demonstrates his true colours over the constitution review process and is in stark contrast to remarks made several times in the past when he pleaded with us, Zambians, to trust him on the matter.
Some naive souls never expected this apparent change of face, but for those few initiated in the arts, the picture comes as no surprise at all.
We can also speculate that the New York 'Damascus' experience involved rubbing shoulders with persons of a less than user-friendly demeanour as this demeanour appears to have rubbed off.
The NCC and those that sanctioned it for the explicit purpose of devolving little or no power to the people must remember that soon, and sooner than they expect, they will be on the other side of the legal fence they are cowering under like the cowards they truly are.
They must bear in mind that they will not be in power forever and when that day comes, their actions and the seeds they sowed while in power will take root, sprout and deliver fruit containing the same bitterness and strife they held in their hearts against the people and nation they were entrusted in stewardship to look after.
My last particle of speculation is that the over-zealousness to administer the punishment of a greater crime than that committed arises from a realisation that the privilages that were available in New York will only be available for a short while, hence the panic to punish those perceived to be responsible for the termination of these privileges, the long-suffering Zambian people.
Arresting people for treason because they are speaking their minds about a document that involves their very own welfare and future will only confirm what we already know - that Mwanawasa and Mugabe are the same side of the coin of brutality and disregard for their own people and, by default, places the aforementioned in the same infamous bracket of failed statesmen that litter the lesser nations of the world. In this there is absolutely no guesswork or element of surprise.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32515
Fuel woes
By Concerned citizen
Wednesday October 10, 2007 [04:00]
Someone once said that it's only in Zambia were people who cannot perform their duties are left to keep their jobs.
One does not need to be an economist to know the effects of a fuel crisis on an economy. But just in case common sense is not common to our leaders, I will give a simple example. It has become the order of the day for employees in organisations to get permission so that they go and look for fuel.
What does this imply? It simply means there is loss in man hours of production and as the saying goes 'Time is money'. No wonder that we are not developing. There is no way we can develop when we have no fuel because fuel drives the economy of every nation.
Please put competent people to handle the energy sector.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32531
Education sector problems
By Concerned Citizen
Thursday October 11, 2007 [04:00]
I wish to add my voice on the prolonged closure of the Copperbelt University (CBU). I find it very difficult to believe the demands from education minister Professor Lungwangwa for CBU management to compile a report on what led to the closure of the university.
I also hear that there is a task force that has been set up to look into the root cause of the closure of the university. What does the minister want when every citizen knows that the university was closed because students became riotous? Their riotous behaviour was as a result of missing lectures.
It is a common practice to temporarily close a university when students become riotous and the management was right to temporarily close the institution in order to bring peace and also to give management a conducive environment to negotiate with the striking lecturers.
It is common knowledge that CBU is a very stable university. Yes it has had closures but not long ones like the current one. CBU has a stable management which is level-headed.
What Prof Lungwangwa is trying to potray to the public and what the public may not see is that CBU and UNZA are equal in terms of management failures.
Prof Lungwangwa was deputy vice-chancellor at UNZA and he and his boss Prof Serpell failed lamentably and could not be given a second term of office while Prof Musonda has performed exemplary at CBU as Vice-Chancellor. As a human being he may have made mistakes but he has been given a second term of office outright without any competition.
CBU produces graduates who are highly sought by the mining industries and delaying their completion is delaying the development of the country. Let the minister swallow his pride and reopen CBU.
All the press statements that CBU management has been putting up in the local press are just meant to please the minister. Otherwise, I know that CBU management is for the idea of reopening the institution.
My word of advice to the government is that salaries and conditions of service in general should be negotiated within a stipulated time frame; not beyond the month of May every year.
Labels: EDUCATION, FUEL, LETTERS, MWANAWASA
Read more...
Investments in mining
By Concerned citizen
Sunday October 07, 2007 [04:00]
Mandala made suggestions about mineral explorations that I find myself unable to ignore. He advised the government that the present conditions do not warrant opening up new mines by private companies. I am glad he is not an official advisor to the government because that kind of advice is not constructive. Zambia is endowed with a vast amount of minerals that are ordinarily too costly to mine.
Our government is not in a position, financially, to open new mines and this point does not need to be stressed any further. What is necessary to emphasise is that Zambia needs private investors to help the government come up with new developments in various forms such as new mines, new and modern equipment for the manufacturing and farming industry, infrastructure and the technical know how.
It is shallow to suggest that we as a country are not getting a good deal from the mining investrors therefore there should be no new mines to be opened by the private investors.
What we should work on is to revise the prevailing contracts with these investors. But are we sure we are able to bear the consequences of changing some clauses in an already agreed contract?
The consequences are simple to understand and anyone that has had a discussion with me before on this issue can easily educate the said Mandala and all those concerned but ill-informed on this subject.
Let’s get as many invetors as we can into our country to help us exploit our natural resources at a good fee.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32369
Let's be careful with foreign investors
By Gersh, Nairobi
Saturday October 06, 2007 [10:00]
It appears our leaders never learn. How many investors have come and left us in misery after making huge profits?
Why should President Mwanawasa and his ministers travel all the way to America to beg for investment?
In many cases foreign investment has not done Zambia much good except for plundering our natural resources.
They just enrich themselves and their countries, leaving us even poorer than they found us. So it is not just a matter of inviting foreign investors.
The government should also invest. I challenge the government to invest and also to be careful with these investors.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32408
CBU's prolonged closure
By Mwansa Sampule
Sunday October 07, 2007 [04:00]
Let me also join in the nation’s displeasure at the continued closure of the Copperbely University.
The nation has to know that the problems that led to the closure of the institution had nothing to do with the students but with the government and management.
Having been a student at CBU, I’m fully aware of how the government spits threats at students every time something goes wrong. Rumour has it that the government used the money meant for students' meal allowances to fund the SADC conference.
Now Lungwangwa thinks he can fool the nation by declaring an indefinite closure of CBU and force management to issue press statements that don’t make sense.
The other thing is that, since none of Lungwangwa, Professor Musonda or Ilunga's children are at the institution there is no need to hurry. I guess anyone can tell why the institution’ has remained closed up to now.
Let me allow intelligent minds to judge what I have said.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32370
Honorary doctorates
By Thomas Zulu
Saturday October 06, 2007 [10:00]
It seems Zambian presidents have become obsessed with being conferred a doctorate. It all started with Dr Kaunda (admittedly it was in fashion then), Dr Chiluba followed suit.
And now the incumbent President has been conferred with a doctorate.
The problem I find is that American and European leaders (presidents) who work very hard and the fruits are there to show in terms of sustained high standard of living are not bestowed with such awards.
This makes them meaningless. It is like crowning Lesotho as world champions in football without them playing in the World Cup or winning any serious games, leaving high achievers.
Nelson Mandela has achieved so much in uniting South Africa. He is a world leader and has been confered with several doctorates but he’s not even using them.
Many great achievers and movers of history are all addressed as Mr unless they have academic qualifications to enable them be called Doctors. What we need are performers not glory seekers.
We voted for a candidate to lead us to prosperity and not to have questionable doctorates.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32372
Fuel shotage
By Paul Nkomesha,Lusaka
Saturday October 06, 2007 [11:00]
The current fuel shortage once again shows the inability of the government to plan ahead.
We pay these people hefty sums of money to run our affairs but what do we get?
If they did their homework we would not be having these shortages.
My appeal to the government is that they should not neglect the duties for which they were elected.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32314
Mongu land allocation scam
By Concerned resident
Friday October 05, 2007 [04:00]
I would like to comment on the Mongu town clerk’s unearthing of an illegal land allocation syndicate by Mongu council officers.
The most disheartening thing is that after these three culprits were about to direct the investing officers to plots they had sold, investigations were stopped. Acquiring land in Mongu is almost impossible if you use the right procedure.
You are always told to keep checking until you get tired and give up, unless you go through the same culprits and pay millions of kwacha.
Madam Masebo, when are you going to visit Mongu Municipal Council, to save Mongu residents from this abuse of office which has become institutionalised?
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32371
Looking to China
By Chilekwa M. Mumba,Lusaka
Saturday October 06, 2007 [10:00]
I would like to comment on President Mwanawasa’s statement that China is Zambia's hope for development. Whether it was taken out of context or not, it has provided an opportunity for us Zambians to perhaps review the route to improving our economy.
It is undeniable that China is looking for its footing as a major player on the world stage, thus their campaign to have access to African resources, evidenced by their willingness to provide loans to strategically selected African nations.
It seems to me that China by virtue of its strong domestic economic position has every right to take the next step to be a world influence by any means it deems necessary provided these "means" do not belittle other nations in Africa, let alone the world.
Zambia on the other hand, has a very weak domestic economic position, and its immediate goals are very different from China’s.
Thus I pose the question: Should Zambia look at China, located on another continent as the single and/or major partner to solve its domestic problems, when China's goals are way different? That's where I differ with the Mwanwasa adminstration’s policy on looking at China as Zambia's one economic redeemer..
In my view especially that Mwanwasa is SADC chairman- there should be serious efforts directed at strenghthening Zambia's ties with our neighbours - that should be the first step to improving our economy.
land-locked- and that has serious effects on the import/export area of our economy. Now if this adminstration, especially now when we have the SADC chairmanship, could use our embassies in our neighbouring countries, by stepping up their operations as more than just diplomatic stations;
Zambia may stop looking for answers across the ocean but look across the border - charity after all begins at home! Mwanawasa should take it upon himself to have high commisioners in our neighbouring countries who have a capability to negotiate and broker trade agreements which will give Zambia a better advantage than is currently obtaining.
This may mean replacing cadres masquerading as high commisioners, with resourceful and enthusiastic individuals who will take advantage of being a "neighbour", and get Zambia's import and export goods to move at lower costs.
Labels: CBU, FDI, FUEL, LETTERS
Read more...
Mineral explorations
By chama
Friday October 05, 2007 [04:00]
I wish to comment on the numerous mineral explorations going on in our country. First of all, let me advise the government that the present conditions do not warrant opening up new mines by private companies. I say so because the mines currently operating in our country do not add any significant value to the well-being of this country.
If anything, they just benefit foreigners. Zambians have cried that the concessions given to these mining firms be revised so that we can see some benefits trikling to ordinary Zambians. Todate, this issue is almost dying a natural death.
It follows therefore that with the prevailing conditions, it not prudent to grant mining licences to foreigners. With the current copper production and prices on the international market, one would have expected this country to have seen huge developments in terms of infrustucture as well as a rise in the standard of living by most of our people. This however is not the case.
Most developments we see around are donor-driven. We used to be told that ZCCM was making losses but if you compare ZCCM with these mining firms which are actually making huge profits, you would not easily agree that ZCCM was oprating at a loss.
During ZCCM days there were a number of community initiatives that were being undertaken. Mining areas were kept clean, social amenities were in place, roads were maintained and above all they employed more of our people than these profit making mining firms. Those of us on the Copperbelt can just see what the road leading to some mine offices in Kitwe look like. It is a sorry sight.
It is time these firms were reminded that the government has introduced the keep Zambia clean and healthy campaign. For sure you cannot tell who is or was making losses between ZCCM and these new firms!
In my view, and at a time such as this, the government should source funds and try to open mines that will be wholly owned by government, something in the lines of ZCCM.
By allowing foreigners to open mines at our doorsteps and every corner of Zambia, we are just leaving a bad legacy for our children and their children. Let us leave something for the future, otherwise posterity will judge us harshly.
Minerals are a wasting asset and so if we are not careful, we will only leave trenches or breeding grounds for mosquitoes as inheritance for our children!
Let those with ears, hear.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32319
Let's borrow money for productive ventures
By Chilekwa M Mumba,Lusaka
Friday October 05, 2007 [04:00]
Allow me to air my views on the retrogressiveness of the Mwanawasa adminstration, which seems to find solace in it's failures through China's loans. It seems our government lives for the day and does nothing to plan ahead for the country's future. To cite one significant example, what sense does it make for Zambia to obtain a 39 million dollar loan for feeder roads- which cannot be said to be permanent structures.
To put it in layman’s language: Which individual in his right capacity will borrow money at a high cost for a house whose roof has to be replaced every year. There is a serious lack of foresight here.
The aforementioned 39 million dollars being spent on feeder roads is better spent on a permannent structure if Zambia is getting a loan which has a serious cost in terms of interest.
It is an abomination that in the 21st century, a governement which claims to be making improvements, is making feeder roads which add absolutely no value to a country's infrastructure. These feeder roads can only be good for a year and not anytime beyond that.
This governement is digging a hole for Zambia every day, and the Chinese are happily providing the shovels with their money. I doubt that there is any serious debate either in Parliament or Cabinet analysing the long-term effects these loans will bring.
Mwanawasa and company are more than happy to be given fish to eat today on a silver plate by the Chinese- rather than be taught how to catch fish for the future.
We should only borrow money for productive undertakings.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32277
I salute Jean Kapata
By Kafa
Thursday October 04, 2007 [04:00]
I want to thank Mandevu MP Jean Kapata for doing a simple investigation about how some of our clinics operate.
She pretended to be heavily pregnant and feeling unwell. She went to Ng'ombe clinic where she waited for one hour before she could be attended to. When the nurse on duty came, she told the patients (including Kapata) to go and seek help elsewhere.
I salute her for doing this because ordinary people are the ones suffering. We need more leaders like her. She cared enough to find out exactly what goes on.
There are no medicines in most of our clinics and the service offered is poor.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32314
Mongu land allocation scam
By Concerned resident
Friday October 05, 2007 [04:00]
I would like to comment on the Mongu town clerk’s unearthing of an illegal land allocation syndicate by Mongu council officers.
The most disheartening thing is that after these three culprits were about to direct the investing officers to plots they had sold, investigations were stopped.
Acquiring land in Mongu is almost impossible if you use the right procedure.
You are always told to keep checking until you get tired and give up, unless you go through the same culprits and pay millions of kwacha.
Madam Masebo, when are you going to visit Mongu Municipal Council, to save Mongu residents from this abuse of office which has become institutionalised?
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32318
Why NCC is a national fraud
By Nkula Kaoma, Lusaka
Friday October 05, 2007 [04:00]
I wish to join the debate on the National Constitutional Conference Act of August 2007.
The principal function of the NCC is to adopt the Mung’omba draft constitution.In adopting this draft constitution, the members, to a large extent would be agreeing that it contains what the petitioners submitted.
Suprisingly enough the Act does not specifically provide for the attendance of these petitioners whose names are still intact at the former CRC sectariat and could be easily contacted if the Act had provided for their attendance.
Most of the members that the Act has provided for are not even petitioners and how then will they know that what is in the Mung’omba draft constitution is what was submitted?
In this regard,the Act should be amended to include all the petitioners and the Mung’omba CRC commissioners and those existing in the Act.The exsting members in the Act like the eminent persons and freedom fighters from each province is good idea but who will nominate them and how?
Labels: INVESTMENT, LAND, LETTERS, MINING
Read more...
Federalism vs decentralization
By CM
Wednesday October 03, 2007 [04:00]
One topic missing from the constitution talks is federalism. Federalism is the answer to underdevelopment. Decentralisation does not go far enough.
Too much power is at State House, the Ministry of Finance and its tool ZRA, Cabinet Office and Manda Hill. In the United Kingdom in 1999, Scotland and Wales were given their own parliament and regional assembly to decide on local tax matter. Scotland has oil in the North Sea but people in towns and cities like Aberdeen used to beg for handouts from the parliament Westminster in England 639 kilometres south.
Similarly you have money from gemstones in the Copperbelt Province being spent in Lusaka, Nigeria, Israel and India. Local people see very little because they have no say who mines the stones. Ng’andu Magande throws them the bones and scraps after he and company have fed at the Ministry of Finance.
Why should a Mr Sichinga in Mbala wait for development from Manda Hill 806 kilometres away? Mbala has all the resources to better Mr Sichinga's life. With federalism he would not blame the central government or the local MP who is always at Parliament Motel for underdevelopment. The money the Ministry of Finance in Lusaka hands out in the budget comes from the wealth in the provinces.
Right now we have money from gemstones in the Copperbelt and Lundazi being spent in Lusaka, Nigeria, Israel and India. The local people instead moan about the pocket change from Magande known constituency development funds.
Federalism will not lead to poverty in some provinces and separatism.
In fact it is a cure for tribalism. If Mongu, Solwezi, Mazabuka, Kabwe, Chipata, Kasama and Mwansabombwe were all as economically vibrant as Livingstone under federalism there would be far fewer people rushing to Lusaka. Lusaka is becoming another overcrowded Lagos. In Lusaka where all the money is to be found there is a lot of tribal gymnastics when real wealth is in the provinces.
South Africa is the model to follow. Each of the nine provinces has a regional legislature and a premier. The provincial legislatures can pass bills on many of the same matters as the national Parliament, but their powers are more limited. They receive some revenue from the national government and also can collect provincial taxes. For instance KwaZulu-Natal has the Port of Durban as a major revenue earner, as well as tourism, banking and manufacturing.
Guateng, KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape are the richest provinces because local effort has made the difference.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32238
Let's cultivate courage
By John Milimo
Wednesday October 03, 2007 [04:00]
As some people have already said, a constitution is not a gift from the government but people give themselves a constitution.
The point I want to emphasise is let us cultivate courage in the constitution-making process and not just talk about it. Words alone won't take us anywhere.
Instead let us be more pragmatic. If the majority is against NCC whose constitution will it be?
If courage is coupled with love, it can even make us sacrifice our lives for the common good. Courage bestows on us superhuman powers leading us to heights of heroism.
This can only come about with a deep inner conviction of wanting to create a just society for the common good, for it emanates not from the absence of fear but from the ability to overcome fear and it can even make us achieve that which seems impossible.
http://www.postzambia.com/post-read_article.php?articleId=32237
A new deal on constitution
By Kombe Ngolwe
Wednesday October 03, 2007 [04:00]
The planned boycotts of the NCC by some civic organisations and political parties reveals lack of consensus among stakeholders.
If the government-sanctioned NCC were a good mechanism, stakeholders’ decision to participate would have been an easy task. But it took days of extra-ordinary meetings and briefings to reach a decision either to boycott or join the NCC.
Since 2003, promises have been made by Mwanawasa's government to come up with a constitution that would stand the test of time and without political deceit. But now it seems the test of time is over and deceit has made a new deal with the government.
Party survival is not a proper motive for selection of a constitution-making process.
Zambians are tired of promises on the constitution and must now make a decisive step for regime change in the next elections. The status quo is undemocratic and unresponsive in taking Zambia forward. Ownership of the process will lead to ownership of the product. The government should engage opposing views about the NCC. Those opposing NCC should state their grievances and offer an alternative process.
The worst political mistake is to continue the process with only selective parties and on pretence of people’s participation. The legitimacy of the constitution involves consent not coercion.
While the NCC Act is now law and will be enforced by force, a constitution will only exist by consent. Zambia needs a new deal on the constitution.
Labels: CONSTITUTION, DECENTRALIZATION, FEDERALISM, LETTERS, NCC
Read more...
