Thursday, August 30, 2012

(TRINIDAD AND TOBEGO NEWS) No compensation for slaves

No compensation for slaves
Published on August 29, 2012 in Africa, Business, Education, General T&T, Indian, Labour, Race and Identity and Racism Watch.
By George Alleyne
August 29, 2012 – newsday.co.tt

The argument has often been put forward by politicians and would be politicians that persons of Indian descent own a far greater degree of property in Trinidad than people of African descent, because they had saved and used their money wisely.

It is an attempt to create misunderstanding between the two major ethnic groups. What led to today’s disparity in land ownership is well documented and rooted in Trinidad’s colonial past. The end of slavery in 1838 and the movement by freed slaves to urban and suburban areas and away from the sugar estates, with which they had for so long identified with their suffering, meant that the sugar planters had to source new labour.

Wages demanded by ex-slaves, who remained, were in the order of some 36 cents a day. Planters, with the example of Indian indentureship in Mauritius, looked to India for the restocking of their labour force.

Lord John Russell, then United Kingdom Secretary of State for the Colonies, would refer to the proposition for the introduction of Indian labour to the West Indies in a letter to Sir Henry Light, Governor of British Guiana, dated February 15, 1840. “It is stated” Lord Russell wrote, “that the wages of a day labourer are in Guiana one shilling and six pence 36 cents per day and in Hindostan (India) not more than two pence.”

While there had been a limited use of Indian indentured labourers in Guiana, between 1837 and 1839, indentureship had not been introduced in other areas of the West Indies. On July 25, 1842, Lord Howick moved a resolution in the British House of Commons: “That is the opinion of this Committee (the House of Commons Committee on the West Indian Colonies)” that, inter alia, “one obvious and desirable mode of endeavouring to compensate “for the diminished supply of labour,” is to promote the immigration of a fresh labouring population, to such an extent as to create competition for employment”.

It should be pointed out that as early as 1814, 24 years before the end of slavery, a planter in Trinidad, William Burnley, had proposed the bringing of free labour from India “on a large scale”, as Dr Eric Williams would note in From Columbus to Castro: The History of the Caribbean (Page 347). This proposal carried with it a sense of urgency as the abolition of the slave trade in 1807 had effectively blocked a traditional means of supplying labour to the sugar plantations.

Sir Ralph Woodford, who was Governor of Trinidad at the time, would recommend to the Colonial Office “the introduction of East Indian immigrants” — Eric Williams. With the bringing into operation of indentureship, a crucial provision of the agreements between parties had been the repatriation of indentureds to India at the end of their contracted stays, with the expense to be borne by the planters. But because sugar planters had found the cost of passages of indentured labourers back to India to be expensive, they made offers to the labourers of either money or land in Trinidad in lieu of return passages.

More than 100,000 accepted. Many of those who accepted cash, purchased land. The entire process would see some 100,000 indentureds becoming land owners. It would provide a financial jump-start and ladder that not even the calculated up to 1970 denial of commercial bank loans, in all too many cases, could negatively affect.

Ironically, following on Emancipation, instead of former slaves being given money for their years of having been forcefully and brutally exploited, money which could have given them the same jump start, the sum of 973,442 pounds sterling was paid out by the British Government to the planters in Trinidad as compensation “for the loss of their slaves”! It was a dismissal of the former slaves and was a statement that only the interests of sugar planters really mattered.

Indeed, the only freed slaves who received grants of land in Trinidad were those who had fought on the side of the British in the 1813 war in Virginia. They were given land in an area South of Princes Town known today as Fourth Company, Fifth Company and Sixth Company.

Meanwhile, despite the efforts of some politicians, Indian and African descent Trinbagonians are committed, as other ethnic groups, to the development of their country.

http://www.newsday.co.tt/commentary/0,165498.html

4 Responses to “No compensation for slaves”
Feed for this Entry Trackback Address

*
TMan
August 29, 2012 at 12:04 pm

I wonder if Mr Alleyne would be interested in examining the causes of the decrease and decline of the African professional and intellectual population in T&T. This pool is slowly drying up presenting challenges with regard to filling political and corporate vacancies in T&T.
Reply
*
Linda Edwards, class of '67
August 29, 2012 at 3:28 pm

This is not a reply but a comment. I am a descendant of the Freed Negroes- called Merikins by some detractors, who have cultivated their own land in the Company Villages since 1815, when my father’s people arrived. I am glad Mr.Alleyne expoed this myth of Indian Industriousness, which if believed, could case someone to ask why then did they not prosper in India?

A jumpstart in a new land is essential. This is why Jonas Mohammed BAth, a West African sultan, petitioned the crown for compensation for those MAndingoes who had already purchased their freedom. He never got a reply. In contrast, my African friends-malawians, Ghnaians, Nigerians have lived on their own land for hundred of years, and the landowning families intermarry, keping and extending property holdings. Some of the Company Village residents lost their land to chicanery. People rented out their holdings, and often and over time, the taxes were paid by the renter, who was Indian. Bitish law is, if you pay the taxes in your own name, after 21 years, it is your land. The Africans did not know this. Their ladholdings are traditional. Everyone knows its yours.

Now there is a mad scramble for regularization of title to lands in East Africa, as extensive mineral wealth has been found in Zambia, Malawi and Congo. One such case involves a friend of mine. She knows where the boundaries of her mother’s family land aare. they have lwys been there.Mother is illiterate and 97 years old. how does one prevent the rampant theft of their copper and iron ore rich lands?
what happened to the African in the Caribbean should be classified as genocide- a deliberate attempt to wipe out the gene pool, by outsiders.
Reply
*
Linda Edwards, class of '67
August 29, 2012 at 8:11 pm

It was in Antigua, where I went to work as a consultant in 1988 that my eyes were opened to the possibilities denied us in TnT. All the liquor stores, jewellry stores and fancy boutiques in their airport were owned by very dark women, who in TnT woul have had a market stall as a business opportunity, and maybe, expanded to two market stalls. Women, African women in Antigua owned trucking businesses, a set of beauty supply stores and salons, owned by one woman, and deparartment stores. The head of Antigua Commercial Bank at the time, John Benjamin, was the only AFRICAN bank manager I knew, and they owned a number of other businesses besides the bank. I began to study their society, and that of Barbados and Jamaica, and found that it was only in Trinidad(not Tobago) where the East Indian had been inserted by the Brit, and supported in their position, that an almost permanent underclass had been ceated among African people.Of course most Trinis have traveled to North America and Europe, but not taken a critical look at their neighbouring islands, so they are unaware of how differently Trinidad fared in the emerging business scene.For less to start thinking of the resons for it. Even in Martinique, the African originated people owned busineses. I first went there in 1976. In Guadeloupe, however, almost everything was white-owned.This difference could be explained by the leadership of Aime Ceziare, Mayor of Fort de France, and a leading French Intellectual, founder of the concept of Negritude. We need in upcoming years to take a more critical look at the emergent business climate in Trinidad. An analysis of small business loans by any bank, could be quite revealing, but the will power, and the laws that would release the documents to an analyst, are not there, or not working. We prefer to believe in the myth of the Lazy African, and we resent the ones from Nigeria who come here and set up small businesses, while we gladly seem to do business with the new immigrant Chinese.

Incidentally, the ONLY Afro-Trini jeweller I know, is a descendant of those free Africans from 1815. His family has the deed to the land they were given, framed and hanging on the wall. A jump-start is a powerful thing.
Reply
*
Mamoo
August 29, 2012 at 10:30 pm

I have always believe that slaves and their descendants should be compensated. I think $7 billion should be enough to make them happy. I would recommend Mr. Alleyne start a campaign by gathering before the British Embassy and making this claim. The slaves after slavery ran away from the land, to this day in Africa starvation is a common feature because of a lack of farmers. Haiti was perhaps the only nation where the people had the land for themselves yet it is the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere. Why? Mr. Alleyne must explain. Also much of the Caribbean is owned by descendants of slavery.

Trinidad and Guyana saw the jealous descendants of slaves wanting more. Burnham tried that experiment by taking lands and giving it to descendants of slaves these lands remain uncultivated while indos fled this tyrant. Many have done extremely well for themselves. In Trinidad islanders were brought in “en mass”. Many of them received houses and today we are seeing the result of this with uneducated boys using the gun to slaughter without a conscience. Mr. Alleyne must understand capitalism, in a capitalist nation you can purchase property at market value. The real question for Mr.Alleyne is why descendants of slaves are prone to be unproductive, lazy and gun lovers.

Finally all descendants of slavery can get on board an airplane and with a one way ticket return to their African motherland. Mr. Goodluck will be happy to receive them.



Labels: ,


Read more...

Friday, July 24, 2009

(HERALD) New British envoy hails inclusive Govt

New British envoy hails inclusive Govt
Herald Reporter

INCOMING British ambassador to Zimbabwe Mr Mark Canning has hailed the formation of the inclusive Government saying he was committed to supporting the arrangement.

After presenting his credentials — along with new ambassadors from Qatar, Tunisia and Trinidad and Tobago — to President Mugabe at State House in Harare yesterday morning, Mr Canning told the media that he was "delighted to be in the country at such an important time".

He becomes the first senior British official to publicly pledge support for the inclusive Government at a time the West has expressed scepticism and stands accused of seeking to sabotage the arrangement by maintaining the illegal economic sanctions on Zimbabwe.

In his prepared speech to journalists, Mr Canning said: "These are still early days. The inclusive Government is only in its sixth month but it has registered some significant gains, particularly in terms of economic stabilisation. There is much work to be done but a start has been made," he said.

There has been cautious optimism that tentative grounds for rapprochement exist following a "frank" meeting between Foreign Affairs Minister Simbarashe Mumbengegwi and former British Junior Foreign Minister Mark Malloch-Brown on the sidelines of South African President Jacob Zuma’s inauguration in Tshwane in May.

Insiders said President Mugabe pointed out to Mr Canning that the reason why relations between the two countries had remained tense was because of the United Kingdom’s retrogressive attitude vis-à-vis the land reform programme and Zimbabwe’s domestic politics.

President Mugabe also explained the country’s colonial history and how Zimbabweans waged a protracted war against British-backed Rhodesians for the right to reclaim their land and natural resources.

Mr Canning refused to field questions from journalists after the more than one-hour meeting with the President. He takes over from Dr Andrew Pocock, who completed his mission last month.

Mr Pocock had been in Zimbabwe since February 2006 and, although he kept a low profile, relations between Harare and London remained frosty, with his country constantly dabbling in Zimbabwe’s internal affairs.

Mr Canning, a one-time security co-ordinator, was based in Rangoon, Myanmar, on his last diplomatic posting. The envoys from Qatar, Tunisia and Trinidad and Tobago presented their credentials to President Mugabe soon after Mr Canning.

Qatar’s Dr Bashir Issa Hassan Mohammed Al Shirawi, who will be based in South Africa, said he will work to strengthen diplomatic relations between the two countries.

"I will be looking at strengthening existing relations while exploring other areas of co-operation in areas such as transport and fuel, among others," he said.

The new Tunisian Ambassador, Professor Ahmed Mahjoub, hailed relations between the two countries.

"Our countries enjoy excellent relations and we would want the strong ties to continue so that we build and enhance this co-operation," he said.

Professor Mahjoub boasts a 30-year career in academia, business leadership and governance and was once a minister for Informatics and Internet in his home country.

He said his country would like to work on enhancing co-operation with Zimbabwe in such areas as health, agriculture, information and communication technologies and other fields.

Dr Winston Mahabir of Trinidad and Tobago said the prospects for greater co-operation between Zimbabwe and his countries were "excellent".

He said he would also be representing Trinidad and Tobago’s sister states, Barbados and Guyana, which share similar foreign policies.

"I would want to enhance South-South co-operation between our countries. I will be working in areas of co-operation such as energy, health, education and culture.

"We will also like to extend scholarships for university education for Zimbabweans who will come back and work for their country," he said.

Dr Mahabir will also be based in Pretoria, South Africa.

Meanwhile, the United States Ambassador-designate to Zimbabwe, Mr Charles Ray, was quoted by Internet news sites as saying he would continue with America’s policies on Zimbabwe if his appointment was confirmed.

Mr Ray told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during nomination hearings for proposed envoys to African countries on Tuesday that he would use his diplomatic experience in China to understand Sino-Zimbabwe relations and "how that can complement what we are doing".

Mr Ray added: "I will continue our efforts to assist the people of Zimbabwe in their pursuit of a representative, democratically elected government that respects human rights, adheres to the rule of law and undertakes the economic reforms necessary to bring prosperity back to Zimbabwe."

The US has often hidden behind words like "human rights", "rule of law" and "democracy" to mask Washington’s regime change agenda in Zimbabwe.

If appointed, Mr Ray will replace Mr James McGee, whose tour of duty coincided with a worsening in relations between the two countries as he continuously meddled in Zimbabwe’s affairs and vowed that he would see to it that the US’ illegal economic remained in place.


Labels: , , , , ,


Read more...