Thursday, June 23, 2011

(NEWZIMBABWE) Nkomo urges Gukurahundi dialogue

Nkomo urges Gukurahundi dialogue
by Staff Reporter
23/06/2011 00:00:00

VICE President John Nkomo has called for a national dialogue over the post-independence Gukurahundi atrocities and warned opposition groups against using the emotive issue to stoke divisions in the country. Speaking in Bulawayo, Nkomo, who is Acting President in the absence of President Robert Mugabe, said the dialogue was needed to bring closure to the emotive subject.

"The way to bring closure to Gukurahundi is by engagement to discuss such issues, but quite often, those who talk about it were never victims or were born yesterday and are too young to comprehend what happened and why,” Nkomo said.

“President Mugabe came to Bulawayo when we were over that period with the late Vice President Joshua Nkomo and we all went to Brethren-In-Christ Church here in town and he said it was a moment of madness. They agreed with Umdala uNkomo that it should be a closed chapter.”

In period after independence in 1980, Mugabe unleashed a North Korean-trained army unit to deal with what was described as a dissident menace in the two regions.

Rights groups, however, say over 20,000 civilians, mainly supporters of Mugabe’s then chief rival Joshua Nkomo, were killed and thousands more driven away from their homes in the two regions in the crackdown.

Mugabe has not directly apologised for the crackdown, only describing it as a “moment of madness that was regrettable”.

Vice President Nkomo said the country needed to move beyond what he described as “irreversible history”.

"We have to accept that where there are human tribulations, such things happen. Let's engage to build a better present and a better future and always remember that what happened is history and we can't reverse it,” he said.

The report of a government-commissioned inquiry into the atrocities is still embargoed even to this day. But that has not stopped clamour in the region for those responsible to be brought to book and demands for victims to be compensated.
But Nkomo warned that the issue was sensitive and needed to be handled with care.

“People must engage and as the Organ on National Healing, our task is to say how it can be handled because fires are being fanned,” he said.

"Look at the years we spent in Gonakudzingwa Prison during the liberation war and there are thousands of people who went to war and never returned so who will compensate them for losing their lives?”



Labels: , ,


Read more...

Thursday, May 05, 2011

(NEWZIMBABWE) Secession not ZAPU policy: Dabengwa

Secession not ZAPU policy: Dabengwa
by Staff Reporter
04/05/2011 00:00:00

ZAPU leader Dumiso Dabengwa says his party does not support secessionist calls by some Matabeleland pressure groups, notably the Mthwakazi Liberation Front (MLF).

Growing sentiment that the three Matabeleland provinces are sidelined from national development programmes has fed resentment of central government in the region, leading to calls for a separate state. But Dabengwa, whose party is a significant force in the region and has devolution of power as its central policy, says the issue calls for “meaningful dialogue”.

“ZAPU is the founder and authentic liberation movement of the whole of Zimbabwe, and has no intention of reducing itself to a tribal or separatist movement,” Dabengwa said in a statement on Wednesday.

“ZAPU liberated and wants to rule all of Zimbabwe, and not part of it.”

Dabengwa says his party would cut the current 10 provinces by half into Mashonaland, Masvingo, Midlands, Manicaland and Matabeleland “to be led by an elected provincial mini-government”.

He added: “There would be provincial or regional houses of assembly with relevant legislative powers. However, there will still be a national house of assembly to legislate national laws. There will still be central government led by a president, similar to what happens in South Africa.

“Regional premiers and their governments will have the mandate to initiate and implement development policies and programmes in their areas and to run social services such as health and education.

“Central government will remain in charge of national issues such as the army, police, national security, monetary and fiscal policies, revenue services, among other key matters of the state. Zimbabwe will still have one national flag, one national anthem, one president, one currency, and no borders between regions.

“There will be a fair and proportional distribution of national income to all the five provinces, as opposed to the current secretive and discriminative distribution of national wealth to favour one region at the expense of four others.”

Dabengwa said devolution, which featured prominently during public consultations on a new constitution last year, would “remove all bottlenecks and red tape created by the current Harare-based centralist governance system”.

“People become masters of their own destiny by controlling and owning their natural resources. Devolution empowers the people to be self-determining,” he added.

The ZAPU leader said he was forced to speak out after being approached by “several journalists wanting to know our position on the MLF or the cessation of Matabeleland”.

“It is clear to us that the journalists seem to believe that ZAPU is behind, or at least sympathetic to the issue of sessation of Matabeleland. This is both false and unfair … Clearly, devolution is not cessation and we do not understand why anyone would want to link our party to the MLF or cession,” he added.

But despite disagreements with the Mthwakazi Liberation Front, whose leaders have been charged with treason, Dabengwa insists that silencing them is not a solution. Instead, Dabengwa wants a national debate on the issues that have led them to take extremist positions.

“Even if we do not agree with the MLF or any other political formation for that matter on any issue, our party will defend their right to hold their views without fear. ZAPU is convinced the people of Matabeleland and some parts of the Midlands have genuine grievances against the current governance system that has disadvantaged them,” Dabengwa said.

“We call for meaningful dialogue on the issue to address the problem and maintain national cohesion. Arresting and detaining leaders of the MLF or anyone who talks about Gukurahundi and the marginalisation of Matabeleland will only worsen the problem.”

Labels: , , , ,


Read more...

Saturday, December 18, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) Diplomacy not doomsaying will unite parties

Diplomacy not doomsaying will unite parties
by Thokozani Mabhena
17/12/2010 00:00:00

THE kind of political communication that was displayed by Methuseli Moyo in his article “MDC-M put down your cross” does not only harm the reputation of the writer but is also corrosive to the image of the organisation that he is associated with.

In that article, Moyo, who is ZAPU’s director of communications and marketing, exposes himself and ZAPU to a lot of unkind attention and damaging conclusions that ZAPU might fail to recover from.

In fact, if ZAPU as a political party can have its seriousness and purposes deduced from what Moyo says and how he says it, then fair-minded people will be forgiven for concluding that it is not a revived ZAPU but a suspicious new political organisation with sinister agendas that is dressed in the name of ZAPU to dupe unsuspecting supporters.

To be fair to Moyo, I will give clear reasons why I believe, as most people will, that his article is more dangerous to ZAPU than to those organisations and individuals that he thinks he is attacking.

A few weeks ago, in a forceful article with the title “ZAPU does not owe Tsvangirai any favours”, he confronted one Sibusiso Dhlodlo and Nevanji Madanhire, editor of the Standard, for calling ZAPU a “small party” and perpetuating Tsvangirai’s misguided agenda of trying to bully other political parties into some alliance with MDC-T in next year’s elections. That is a good fight that Moyo fought and many people congratulated him for hitting the nail on the heard and putting MDC-T in their place.

The same Methuseli, armed with the same arrogance and big party mentality of Dhlodlo and Madanhire, tries to minimise the Arthur Mutambara-led MDC to a “small party” that must urgently join ZAPU or face “doom”. For good measure, Moyo bets “one of” his “bulls” that without joining ZAPU, MDC-M has no future.

Now, Moyo has to work overtime to distinguish himself from the Dhlodlos and Madanhire’s of our time and one hopes that such double standards and self- contradictions that bespeak massive confusion are not indicative of the state of affairs in ZAPU as an organisation.

Whoever told Moyo and his anonymous friend that the bad political advice that they tried to sell to MDC-M and failed is a strategy was wrong by a very wide margin. A strategy is normally a map of action, well researched, which answers the whats, hows and whens of action with a projection of results and or consequences of the action.

Advising MDC-M to rejoin MDC-T and disengage later, or to go regional, does not come near being a strategy by any stretch of the dictionary as we know it. It is simply bad political advice that was blind to the factors and reasons that caused the MDC split which included tribalism and the Americans funding the spilt.

These are factors that are well known to Methuseli as he mentions them in his challenge to Dhlodlo and Madanhire. For Methuseli to conveniently ignore these factors, then arm himself with the “I told you so attitude” by claiming that had MDC-M taken his advice they were going to win elections, tells us more about his own simplicity than the mistakes of MDC-M.

Methuseli accuses the leadership of MDC-M of failing to assume leadership and going to “hire Mutambara” from “Mashonaland” to lead the party. My God! For a whole journalist and director of communications like Moyo to try to reduce Mutambara’s political value in Zimbabwe to that of a politician for “hire” is neither fair nor funny.

What happened to political memory? Morgan Tsvangirai achieved his first recognition in oppositional politics in 1988 when he pledged solidarity with Auther Mutambara who had been arrested after he Generalled University of Zimbabwe students in a direct confrontation with Mugabe. It was the biggest mass action ever in Zimbabwe where students and ZCTU opposed the one party state agenda and corruption in government.

Mutambara’s political and other CVs do not need research, only a modicum of memory. To try and compress this formidable politician to a hireling is unforgivable street wisdom, the kind of thinking that we have learnt to associate with the MDC-T. Mutambara is a formidable politician with solid credentials besides coming from Mashonaland, and Moyo cannot be easily forgiven for purveying such pedestrian analysis.

When The Chronicle “generously” covers MDC-M and not Dumiso Dabengwa, Moyo cries foul. It is a Zanu PF strategy to black-out ZAPU. How Methuseli comes to blame MDC-M for a clear strategy by Zanu PF is strange.

He goes on to lampoon MDC-M and doubts “if they still have any” members left and that they can “even join Zanu PF” if they want to survive. This kind of indecorous communication and insulting behavior is not expected from a party like ZAPU that is looking for supporters and allies against MDC-T and Zanu PF.

Methuseli might claim that he is speaking in his personal capacity, but as a person who is aware of ZAPU’s internal communication policy, his words inevitably indicate what ZAPU is about. As a leader within ZAPU, his manner and attitude is likely to spread with bacterial speed amongst the party membership, reducing the party to an unfortunate gathering of political snobs who are chasing people away from the party than proselytize.

If Moyo’s purpose in communicating thus is to encourage unity or alliance talks between ZAPU and MDC, which is a noble purpose, then he is going about it the wrong way. If his agenda, like Dhlodlo and Madanhire, is to bully and intimidate MDC-M into joining ZAPU, then he is ill- advised because in politics it is diplomacy and not doom-saying that unites political parties.

Moyo’s apocalyptic threats of “doomsday” for MDC-M and the crucificial “cross” that he is talking about is neither diplomatic language nor is it good for ZAPU’s own image management needs.

Moyo, like many other serious people, knows it in letter and verse that a unity or alliance between ZAPU and MDC-M might close out MDC-T and Zanu PF from Matabeleland and the Midlands, which will be a political good harvest for both parties and a good beginning for the political and economic recovery of the region. It is, therefore, unfair and very sad for a senior ZAPU official like Moyo to approach that subject with such carelessness and reckless abandon.

To ridicule, minimise and prophesy “doom” against MDC-M is disrespect of a strong potential ally for ZAPU, and an ally which already has some sitting members of parliament and a wealth of experience on its side. It cannot be over emphasised that ZAPU and MDC-M are political parties that need each other, which makes respect and diplomacy between them more important.

Moyo should carry himself, intone his communication and order his attitude in a sober and sound manner that befits the name of ZAPU and exudes the aura of the late Joshua Nkomo and his successor Dumiso Dabengwa -- serious leaders with a historical liberatory agenda. If Methuseli is impatient with the conduct of some officials in MDC-M, he can as well take the war to the boardroom, not in the media, which has the unintended consequences of arming the opposition with free fuel for propaganda.

Most of us who are persuaded to the idea of a possible alliance or even unity between ZAPU and MDC-M are aware than both political parties must prepare for a propaganda and information war that Zanu PF and MDC-T will unleash towards the coming elections.

Soon enough, Methuseli and others should be bracing for fierce battles of ideas and opinions. There is definitely going to be blood. One hopes that both ZAPU and MDC-M will not be found unprepared. The season of sleepless nights and burning of candles responding to propaganda and challenging lies from Zanu PF and MDC-T will soon be upon you Methuseli, extend the hand of diplomacy to your potential allies and not burn bridges before the rainy season!
Thokozani Mabhena is a member of MAGEM in the United Kingdom. He writes in his personal capacity. Email: thokozanimabhena@rocketmail.com

Labels: , ,


Read more...

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) Zapu owes Tsvangirai no favours

Zapu owes Tsvangirai no favours
by Methuseli Moyo
23/11/2010 00:00:00

OUR party, Zapu, has at all costs always avoided antagonising or interfering with the media, but the conduct and opinions of some of the editors and their columnists has compelled us to write in response to two articles in The Standard newspaper of September 21 to 27, 2010.

The articles were penned by the editor of the paper, Nevanji Madanhire, under the From the Editor’s Desk column, while the other one was by one Sibusiso Dlodlo, who we were told is a “political commentator based in Bulawayo”. Madanhire’s opinion piece was headlined “Take seriously call for united front next year”, while Dlodlo’s was titled “Zapu is a party of retrogressive reactionaries”.

The two pieces occupied all of page 11, presumably to give weight to the “serious” issue of blackmailing Zapu into supporting Morgan Tsvangirai in next year’s elections.

Dlodlo’s piece also made its way into the pages of the government-controlled Chronicle newspaper, which, as a matter of policy, always tries to exclude the name Zapu from its pages, but cannot.

After reading the two articles, I was left convinced that they were written by one person, or by two people who think alike, and rehearsed their pieces to drive their “point” home. I doubt if there is a political commentator by the name Sibusiso Dlodlo anywhere in the world, let alone in Bulawayo.

There is a growing tendency in Zimbabwe whereby one adopts a Ndebele name (and Sibusiso Dlodlo is very Ndebele) if they want to put across a negative comment about Zapu (and also about Highlanders Football Club) to escape being dismissed by Ndebeles as being Shona and therefore biased “against us”.

I believe the pen name “Sibusiso Dlodlo” was used to give an impression that the anti-Zapu comment was written by “one of them”, and therefore Zapu has no support even among Ndebeles. It reminds me of fake “dissidents” during Gukurahundi. Initially, a lot of people would confide to the fake dissidents that they supported them, only for the dissidents to pass on their names to the army and they would be dead the following morning. In the end, the people ended up knowing the real and fake dissidents and what to say to each one of them.

My senses tell me “Sibusiso Ddlodlo” is a “fake dissident”. I would be more than happy to meet this Sibusiso Dlodlo if ever he or she exists.

The essence of the two Standard articles was that Zapu must agree to support Tsvangirai to help him defeat President Mugabe in next year’s elections. The argument is that “small parties” would divide the vote and prevent Tsvangirai from winning.

The articles become self-contradictory because they say the so-called small parties are not serious at all, while at the same time admitting that their preferred candidate, Tsvangirai, can only do it with the support of the small parties.

By the way, Zapu was never a small party, and will never be. Zapu is the founder and authentic liberation movement of Zimbabwe, a party which contested and won seats in the 1980 and 1985 elections, and kept its supporters together even during genocide, until Mugabe realised he could not crush it and called for unity.

If Zapu could be effective in a two-party system, how about now in a three-party system, if we were to discount the other MDC, as per Madanhire and Dlodlo’s wishes? Zapu can only be more effective now than in 1980, because Zanu no longer has monopoly of support where it used to have it.

Madanhire and Dlodlo need to know that Zapu is Zapu, and does not owe any party or any politician, including Tsvangirai and his MDC, any favour. We have our own objectives, mission, policies and mandate from our own supporters to fulfill, and are not prepared to give way to Mugabe, Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara or Simba Makoni and their parties.

As for Tsvangirai, he is just a little Robert Mugabe as far as we are concerned. Like Mugabe and others who split from Zapu in 1963, Tsvangirai and others split from the original MDC in 2005. In both instances, seemingly logical explanations were given for the split, but it was obvious the splits were tribally-motivated. The Zanu gang did not want to be led by “zimuNdewere” (Joshua Nkomo), while the MDC-T gang could not imagine the prospect of Ndebeles (Welshman Ncube and the late Gibson Sibdanda) take-over if Tsvangirai was convicted of the treason charges he was facing.

As for the MDC split, those who differ with me should kindly ask the leadership of the two MDCs to furnish them with a copy of the report on the reasons for the split. The report was produced by an internal panel, and therefore has to be believed. Until and unless Tsvangirai can convince us that he is indeed a true nationalist and is not possessed by Mugabe’s demon of hegemony, then we can start taking his calls for unity seriously.

Tsvangirai failed to unite with fellow MDC cadres and we do not expect him to be able to unite with Zapu, or any other political formation for that matter. He suffers from the winner-take-all-mentality. He wants to replace Mugabe and continue with Mugabe’s tendencies. That is not the change we want.

The two gentlemen’s (or Sibusiso Dlodlo is a she?) tribal agenda is exposed when they single out MDC’s Welshman Ncube together with our president and icon, Dr Dumiso Dabengwa, for lampooning for daring declare that they want to run for the presidency in the next election. The tone of their articles is that Dabengwa and Ncube, and indeed any other person who is Ndebele, “does not stand a chance in heaven” of winning, and must therefore choose which candidate from Mashonaland their parties must support. Madanhire and Dlodlo go further to dictate that they must choose Tsvangirai.

Madanhire correctly says that Dr Dabengwa has not won a constituency election since 2000, but omits to add that Tsvangirai also lost a constituency to the late Kenneth Manyonda in his rural home in Buhera in 2000. In the case of Dabengwa, he lost simply because he stood for the wrong party (Zanu PF) in Nkulumane constituency. As he aptly put after his loss, even a donkey standing on an MDC ticket against Zanu PF would have won. Dabengwa’s statement dramatised the amount of hatred of Zanu PF in Matabeleland.

Madanhire also omits mentioning that Tsvangirai lost in the 2002 presidential to President Mugabe. Madanhire declares that Tsvangirai won the last presidential election. Why is he not president then? What guarantee do we have that if he wins the next one, as Madanhirie wishes, Tsvangirai would be able to assume power? What sort of politician wins elections and fails to assume power?

If Zapu won elections and Dr Dabengwa failed to assume power, our party would look for a candidate who would assume power after winning elections in future. We need indoda sibili to do it, and Tsvangirai is not an indoda sibili.

Madanhire also refers to imaginary squabbles “threatening to tear Zapu apart”. Maybe he is referring to the tired fiction in the Financial Gazette about “problems” in Zapu. None of the stories have ever been attributed to any member of Zapu, dead or alive. It is sad when editors reduce themselves to political commissars of parties to this level.

While it is not debatable that state news media is rabidly pro-Zanu PF, some sections of the privately-owned press continue to behave no better either by persistently being MDC-Tsvangirai zealots, even when it is no longer fashionable to do so. The media must help us to transcend beyond the Mugabe-versus-Tsvangirai era, to the next stage, which is multiparty democracy. We have been independent for 30 years and have learnt from experience what happens when you have one strong, unchallenged, political party. We do not want to make the same mistake with Tsvangirai and his MDC.

Whether Madanhire, Dlodlo and other writers caught up in the Mugabe-versus-Tsvangirai warp like it or not, the time for multiparty politics is upon us, thanks to Zanu PF and MDC-T’s hegemonic tendencies that made us wake up and smell the coffee.

Tsvangirai, Madanhire and Dlodlo-the-fake-dissident can continue to imagine that Zapu is a small party at their own peril. Madanhire strangely acknowledges that Tsvangirai failed to garner the requisite 50 percent-plus-one-vote in March 2008 because Makoni and his MKD had taken away 8 percent of the vote. They must brace themselves for a worse scenario in the next election because Zapu will certainly do better than Makoni and MKD, meaning both Mugabe and Tsvangirai would be very far from the 50 percent-plus-one-vote next time around.

If it so happens, as Madanhire imagines, that the Zapu candidate is not part of the top two, and therefore not part of the run-off, whoever between the top two candidates is serious about becoming the next president of Zimbabwe will have to give Zapu a fair deal in exchange for our support. It is Tsvangirai, and not Zapu, who needs to be serious about his proposed united front in next year’s elections.

Madanhire and Dlodlo must also know that Makoni beat Tsvangirai in most constituencies in Matabeleland and should brace themselves for a thorough drubbing of the MDC-T in Zapu’s traditional strongholds. The people of Matabeleland spoke very loudly in 2008 that they are neither fascinated by Mugabe nor Tsvangirai by voting for Makoni, even when he had no party or parliamentary candidates.

To my “tribesman” Dlodlo, Zapu is not an old people’s party. I am 36 years-old. Our party has a growing youth league, which we call the Zapu Youth Front, whose congress is scheduled for the next few months. Dr Dabengwa and Mama Thenjiwe Lesabe, whom you seem to hold with contempt, are our liberators and icons who bring wisdom and experience into the game, which is in short supply in Tsvangirai and his MDC.

If Dabengwa and Lesabe were old and spent forces as you allege, then why are you so worried about them and Zapu? Your language suggests you are a keen follower of the Zanu PF doctrine, using words like “retrogressive reactionaries, tribalists”, among other negative terminologies.

Zapu would like to allay Dlodlo’s fears that our party is composed of angry and vengeful people. Those of us affected by Gukurahundi, including Dr Dabengwa, have forgiven and all we ask for is truth and proper reconciliation to close the sad chapter. If for sure Dlodlo was a real Dlodlo, he would know better himself and not begrudge anyone for being hurt about what happened during Gukurahundi. If the perpetrators have not apologized, why should the victims forgive them?

Finally, Zapu wishes to make it clear to editors and columnists who abuse their privileges not only to support their preferred political formations and candidates, but to attack our party in the manner Madanhire and Dlodlo conspired to do, that we will now answer fire with fire, and blood with blood. Be warned comrades.

In the meantime, Zapu is organising to hit the campaign trail soon, starting with Bulawayo, and we are happy to announce that several incumbent councilors from MDC-Tsvangirai in the city tell us that their hearts are “written Zapu” and they will say “I do” when the right time comes. As for rural districts in Matabeleland, it is game over.

Methuseli Moyo is the Director of Communication and Marketing for Zapu. E-mail him: methumoyo@yahoo.co.uk

Labels: , ,


Read more...

Sunday, September 19, 2010

(STICKY) (MrK) South African Agents Murdered White Farmers in Zimbabwe Before

Propaganda And Exploitation Of Gukurahandi

Propaganda and psychological operations have played a major part in the anti-revolutionary war in Zimbabwe and South Africa, since there was no democratic legitimacy to the apartheid and UDI governments.

As a result, they tried to prolong their stay in power by appealing to racist stereotypes of African rule, and by subverting and undermining the revolution, including murdering tourist and white farmers, and sabotaging infrastructure.

One such effort in Zimbabwe, directed and supported by apartheid South Africa, was Operation Drama, and the creation of an anti-government dissident group, called Super ZAPU. It were these activities that led to the killings in Matabeleland, by the Zimbabwean 5th Brigade.

Because this has become a political football for the MDC and related Rhodesian and South African elements, it is important to provide the historical context, so these events are not hijacked for political gain by the same individuals who created them in the first place.

From the March 1997 report compiled by the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Zimbabwe, titled: REPORT ON THE 1980S DISTURBANCES IN MATABELELAND & THE MIDLANDS. With both South African and Rhodesian forces killing whites for propaganda purposes after independence, you can't help but wonder who killed the 11 white farmers who died during land reform.

2.SOUTH AFRICAN DESTABILISATION POLICY

As countries in southern Africa began to gain their independence from 1975 onwards, white-ruled South Africa began an increasingly coherent policy of destabilising these nations, in order to prolong its own power. Independent nations most notably affected by South African destabilisation in the early 1980s were Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Lesotho. This policy and some of its ramifications for Africa have been admirably documented in Joseph Hanlon's Beggar your Neighbours: Apartheid Power in Southern Africa. As the current Truth and Reconciliation Commission progresses in the now democratic South Africa, further details of these events are coming to light.

A) A TWO-FOLD APPROACH

South African intervention in Zimbabwe in the 1980s was basically two-fold: it consisted of the systematic supply of misinformation to the Government, and also of military attacks on the government and on the country's infrastructure. Many ex-members of the Rhodesian army, police and CIO became integrated into the South African armed forces. Some remained in the country after Independence and actively recruited people for sabotage duties or to act as double agents. Some became trusted Government informers, ideally placed to exacerbate tensions between ZAPU and ZANUPF by the use of misinformation. ZAPU was blamed for various events, which were in fact often at least partly the work of South African agents. This created an atmosphere in which distrust and dislike between ZANU-PF and ZAPU escalated.

Physical attacks by South Africans in Zimbabwe included the destruction of a huge arsenal at Inkomo Barracks near Harare in August 1981, an attempt to kill Mr Mugabe in December 1981, and the sabotage of the Thornhill Air Base in Gweru in July 1982, which resulted in the destruction of a substantial percentage of Zimbabwe's Air Force aircraft. This last attack was probably coordinated by ex-members of the Rhodesian Special Air Services working for South Africa, although this has never been confirmed. Initially, local white officers (including the Chief of Staff) in the Zimbabwe Air Force were accused of the crime and brutally tortured. They were later acquitted by the High Court of Zimbabwe but were promptly re-detained and only released on condition they immediately left their country.

In addition to these major bombings, there was a steady stream of minor incidents. One of these resulted in the killing of 3 white members of the South African Defence Force in a remote part of Zimbabwe near the eastern border, in August 1981. They were part of a bigger group of 17, and their deaths were incontrovertible evidence of South Africa's forays into Zimbabwe. Of the 3 dead, 2 were former members of the Rhodesian armed forces. They were believed to be on their way to sabotage a railway line from Zimbabwe to Mozambique when they were intercepted and killed. Major arms caches which were discovered in early 1982, and which caused the final rift between ZANU-PF and ZAPU, were almost certainly engineered by a South African agent, Matt Calloway.

Calloway was in fact head of a branch of the Zimbabwean CIO at the time the arms were stockpiled, although he later defected to South Africa. South Africans were also implicated in the timing of the "find", and in the subsequent trial of Dumiso Dabengwa and Lookout Masuku. The kidnapping of 6 foreign tourists in July 1982 was also blamed on ZAPU and Joshua Nkomo: recent confessions by ex-Rhodesian CIO members now indicate that South African agents may have kidnapped and killed these tourists, with the direct aim of fuelling antagonisms between ZANU-PF and ZAPU. According to these South African agents, the operation took three weeks to plan and involved 8 ex-members of Rhodesia's notorious Selous Scouts, armed with Kalashnikov rifles. From the time of the tourists' disappearance, the Zimbabwean Government referred to the kidnapping as the work of dissidents.

The final truth in this matter has yet to be established: this latest report and those who now make this claim may well prove to be unreliable, but convincing evidence either proving or disproving the claims may come to light in the course of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

B) "OPERATION DRAMA"


"Operation Drama" was the South African code name for the undercover support of Zimbabwean dissidents. It was carried out under the direction of Col Moeller and Col Jan Breytenbach. Operation Drama's primary role was the formation and funding of "Super ZAPU". This was a small band of dissidents, recruited from refugee camps in Botswana and trained in four camps in the Transvaal. Super ZAPU operated in southern Matabeleland in 1983 and 1984, exacerbating the security situation already in existence. Precise numbers of Super ZAPU and the degree of material support offered by South Africa to Zimbabwean dissidents remain largely conjecture, although it is clear the Zimbabwean operation was far less extensive than those in Angola and Mozambique, which operated concurrently.

Those interviewed about the South African involvement in Zimbabwe all commented that it is noteworthy that far less is known about South Africa's military destabilisation policy in Zimbabwe than about its Mozambique or Angolan operations. The lack of available knowledge suggests that fewer personnel were entrusted with information about "Operation Drama", which in turn suggests that the Zimbabwean operation was not only smaller, but regarded as more highly sensitive.

C.SUPER ZAPU

Super ZAPU was the group of South African backed dissidents, which operated in Southern Matabeleland from late 1982 until mid-1984. Super ZAPU consisted of probably fewer than 100 members who were actually actively deployed in Zimbabwe. They were largely recruited from refugee camps and led by ex-ZIPRA members, who had been retrained in South Africa, in the covert operation known as Operation Drama. A Zimbabwean Government briefing paper on the situation in 1983 conceded "the recent efforts of the Fifth Brigade in Matabeleland have offered the South Africans another highly motivated dissident movement on a plate". Some sources claim that it was once again Matt Calloway, an ex-member of the Rhodesian CIO who acted as a double agent for the South Africans, who was a key player in the campaign to recruit from Dukwe Refugee camp in Botswana.

While they operated, South Africa provided ammunition for Super ZAPU, and some of this found its way to other dissident groups in the country: arms and ammunition used by dissidents frequently indicated South Africa as the source of origin, particularly during 1983.

*Super ZAPU were also directly responsible for the deaths of white farmers in southern Matabeleland, during their time of operation.*

However, other dissident groups treated them with suspicion because of their South African link. "We said we don't want to be UNITA", was the comment of one ex-dissident, who saw a connection between Super ZAPU and South Africa's involvement in the civil war in Angola. Loyalty to ZAPU ideals by local dissidents contributed to the fact that Super ZAPU was comparatively short-lived.

By mid-1984 Super ZAPU was collapsing, partly as a result of clashes with other dissident groups, and also because of official military response and complaints to South Africa from the Zimbabwean Government. Apart from its role as a destabilising force, Super ZAPU probably also played a minor anti-ANC role. Since the 1960s the ANC had used Matabeleland as one entry point to South Africa, and placing Super ZAPU in Matabeleland would have helped provide a buffer zone against their infiltration. While some sources contend that Super ZAPU had a brief revival in 1985, evidence in support of this is not well substantiated.


Labels: , , , , , ,


Read more...

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) Elections: ZAPU wants SADC peace keeping force

Elections: ZAPU wants SADC peace keeping force
by Ntungamili Nkomo
15/09/2010 00:00:00

ZAPU president Dumiso Dabengwa says his party wants the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to deploy a peace-keeping force to Zimbabwe ahead of the next general elections.

The ex-home Affairs Minister said Tuesday that elections should be held next year, arguing that the power-sharing government between Zanu PF and the two MDC factions was ill-conceived and not working.

“SADC, in addition to its observer mission, should have a police monitoring force deployed to ensure that there is no intimidation and that people vote freely,” Dabengwa told a Washington video conference from Johannesburg.

Dabengwa said in the absence of state-sponsored violence witnessed in the 2008 elections, intimidation and retribution, there was no way President Robert Mugabe can win the next round of balloting.

“I foresee a situation where by the haggling in the inclusive government can never end. Give it two more years; the governing parties will still be fighting each other. We believe the only way out is a new poll,” added Dabengwa.

Also speaking from Johannesburg at the same symposium organised by Freedom House to review the operations of the unity government two years on, MDC-T parliamentary chief whip, Innocent Gonese, said his party also wanted elections next year that will produce a clear-cut winner.

Gonese said while his party was concerned at the slow pace of reform and implementation of the Global Political Agreement, it was pleased that the power sharing government had made “considerable strides” in turning the economy around.

“Obviously we are expecting SADC to play a very big role to ensure that the elections are going to produce an indisputable outcome,” Gonese told the conference.

President Mugabe and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai have both sounded the polling bell in recent months, telling their party activists to brace for fresh elections next year.

But some analysts are sceptical over the country’s preparedness for a new round of voting.

Political commentator Takura Zhangazha, who also took part in the video panel, differed sharply with both Dabengwa and Gonese saying the electorate was simply not ready to go to the polls just as yet.

If anything, Zhangazha said, Zimbabwe might end up with another negotiated government.

Despite intense lobbying by both Zanu PF and the MDC-T on elections next year, the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission has all but ruled out this possibility saying it needs at least 18 months to clean up the widely-discredited voters roll.

It also says it has not financial wherewithal to conduct the balloting.

Labels: , , ,


Read more...

Monday, September 06, 2010

(HERALD) Donors ditch MDC-T for Zapu

Donors ditch MDC-T for Zapu
By Zvamaida Murwira

TRADITIONAL Western donors and some multilateral financial institutions have allegedly ditched MDC-T in favour of Dr Dumiso Dabe-ngwa’s Zimbabwe African People’s Union.

Highly-placed MDC-T sources revealed last week that the traditional financiers were getting fed up with the party’s infighting and factionalism — a development that has seen party projects suffering and workers’ salaries slashed.

One of the projects that have been affected is the production of the party newsletter, The Changing Times, while the Prime Minister’s newsletter’s days on the streets are reportedly numbered.

The source said donor funds had dried up and the PM’s newsletter would continue to be produced because printers were paid in advance after which it will disappear from the streets.

Donor fatigue has taken its toll on the party as some workers who were part of the parallel government structures in the PM’s Office and party workers are also going to be affected.

Some workers in the parallel government from the PM’s Office have allegedly been earning lucrative salaries ranging from US$700 to US$7 000, while most civil servants earn less than US$200.

Some workers in the party who were receiving additional packages because of their ties with some senior party officials are likely to find themselves in the same category with their peers.

Contacted for comment, MDC-T spokesperson Mr Nelson Chamisa declined to comment saying that he did not want to be dragged into The Herald’s "lies".

"You manufacture lies and you want to bless your story with putting my voice. I will not do that," Mr Chamisa charged.


However, the donor community is reported to be setting their eyes on the recently launched Zapu whose congress saw a sizeable number of Western and American diplomats attending the event.

These are traditional MDC-T financiers.

Morale is reported to be at its lowest among party workers in the parallel government and those in the party, who used to earn fat salaries, said another source.

Those who have been earning ordinary salaries from the party are on the other hand celebrating because happier days for their peers have now come to an end.

"The party is in the red. There was a pool of funds by Western donors who now seem to have been fed up by the constant bickering and infighting and they want to try their chance at Zapu," said one source.

Another source said the fact that the party had failed to recruit a new director of communication to replace Luke Tamborinyoka, who has been reassigned to the PM’s Office, was an indication of the hard times the party was going through.

Instead, the party settled for Mr William Bango, who is now doubling up as director of policy and research.

"This is an indictment of the party being in the red. The feeling was that we should recruit from outside but because there is no money we are having to settle for Mr Bango, who is now doubling up with his other portfolio," said the source.

The Changing Times, whose initial print run was around 100 000 and was distributed for free across the country, was cut to less than 1 000 before production completely stopped in recent weeks.

"The last time when The Changing Times was being produced, it was only being distributed in limited quantities and areas — only in Harare in particular not in those areas, which it also used to be distributed," said the source.

Another source said the MDC-T launched a new party card recently in a bid to contain the donor flight.

"But again the launch was a disaster because no one can buy the party cards. It cost US$12 for an ordinary member, US$24 for provincial members while ministers and other senior members pay about US$120. Can an ordinary person afford US$12?" asked another source.

Zapu president Dr Dumiso Dabengwa dismissed reports that Western donors were eyeing his party saying the party was funded by its members.

He said the presence of diplomats at their congress where he was elected president was neither here nor there as they had invited them to witness the event.

"We have not been funded by any outsider except our members; if you check our books you will notice that we have not received a single cent from any outsider. I am talking of individuals, let alone a country or international organisation," said Dr Dabengwa.

He said his party had written letters to some donors merely to fund some workshops and activities aimed at enhancing democracy but up to now no money was forthcoming.

He did not disclose the identity of the donors or whether they were local or foreign.

The MDC-T has in the past been dogged by infighting, which has seen some clashes at Harvest House as the party approached congress.

Labels: , ,


Read more...

Sunday, August 15, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) Forget past political squabbles: Nkomo

Forget past political squabbles: Nkomo
by Staff Reporter
15/08/2010 00:00:00

VICE President John Nkomo says Zimbabweans should forget past political squables which led to bloody clashes in the Matebeleland and Midlands provinces warning that the country could be torn apart unless people agreed “to move forward".

Nkomo, who is acting head of state in the absence of President Robert Mugabe, was speaking at celebrations to mark Zanu PF politburo member and presidential affairs minister Didymus Mutasa’s 75th birthday in Rusape on Saturday.

“It is true that after independence, there were squabbles between Zanu-PF and Zapu but whatever happened in the past should be water under the bridge. We should heal the wounds, reconcile and integrate ourselves,” Nkomo said.

A few years after independence, the then Prime Minister Robert Mugabe deployed a specially trained army brigade into Matebeleland and Midlands to quell a dissident insurrection in a campaign rights organisations say killed an estimated 20000 civilians.

The disturbances ended when Mugabe signed a unity agreement with PF Zapu leader Dr Joshua Nkomo in 1987.

Vice President John Nkomo said dwelling on the past could tear the country apart.

“We need peace, unity and tranquility to prevail so that we can move forward as a nation. If we say an eye for an eye, Zimbabwe will be blind,” Nkomo said at the celebrations which were also attended by cabinet ministers, Zanu-PF politburo and central committee members as well as traditional and religious leaders.

Nkomo’s remarks come at a time when several senior members of PF Zapu, led by Dumiso Dabengwa, have left Zanu PF to revive their former party as a separate political entity.

They claim that the Unity Accord has not benefitted the regions most affected by the post-independence disturbances.

Labels: , , ,


Read more...

Friday, July 02, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) Tsvangirai no better than Mugabe: Dabengwa

Tsvangirai no better than Mugabe: Dabengwa
02/07/2010 00:00:00
by Staff Reporter

INTERIM ZAPU leader, Dumiso Dabengwa says Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai is no different from President Robert Mugabe and dismissed Dr Simba Makoni as a “braai stick” he used to ensure none of the main presidential contenders in 2008 won an outright mandate.

Speaking to party members at Gwamayaya in Nkayi North on Wednesday, Dabengwa said he had used ex-finance minister, Makoni, to stop both Mugabe and Tsvangirai from winning an outright majority in the disputed elections.

He said after failing to convince Mugabe to step down for a younger leader and having misgivings about Tsvangirai’s leadership capabilities, a decision was made to stop the veteran Zanu PF leader and his MDC-T rival from winning and indisputable mandate to govern.

The former Home Affairs minster, now leading efforts to revive PF ZAPU, was the only senior Zanu PF member to ditch the party and back Makoni’s bid for the presidency in 2008.

Makoni took 8.3 percent of the presidential vote thus preventing both Mugabe (43.2 percent) and Tsvangirai (47.9 percent) from winning outright in the first round.

Dabengwa said the decision to back Makoni was informed by a conviction that a “one-on-one electoral battle between Mugabe and Tsvangirai would spawn disastrous consequences for the country, who-ever won”.

“We used Makoni to stop both the old man and Tsvangirai whose track record we did not feel would make him a good president. Makoni was a braai stick. You put away the braai stick when you have finished roasting and then enjoy your meat,” the former Zipra supremo said.

The ZAPU leader launched a withering attack on Tsvangirai claiming the premier was no different from Mugabe “in his attitude and actions”. He further criticised Tsvangirai for refusing to enter into a coalition with other opposition groups adding the MDC-T leader wanted his party to be the only dominant political player in the country.
Dabengwa said the strategy to use Makoni had paid-off as both Mugabe and Tsvangirai were forced to negotiate a coalition government leading to the relative easing of political tensions and the improvement of the country’s economy.

“We achieved our aim of stopping both devils from being in power alone. We are now eating the braai. That is why ZAPU is back. Let us enjoy the braai. It is now anyone’s game and we are in with a very strong chance,” he said.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Thenjiwe Lesabe, another former senior Zanu PF official also told the meeting that Dabengwa had “never been Zanu PF at heart” despite sitting in the party’s high councils and serving under Mugabe as a cabinet minister.

“He (Dabengwa) was never Zanu-PF in his heart even during the Unity Accord period. He could have joined Zanu when he was imprisoned for five years during Gukurahundi. Zanu promised him freedom within minutes if he left ZAPU and joined Zanu, but (Dabengwa) and his late fellow Zipra commander Lookout Masuku (said they) would rather die in prison than join Zanu,” Lesabe said.

She added that Dabengwa only joined the new government after the 1987 Unity Accord when “ordered” to do so by the late PF ZAPU leader and national vice president Joshua Nkomo.

“Most of us were very excited about being ministers and riding the new Mercedes Benz (vehicles), but Dabengwa was not impressed. It took an order from his commander-in-chief (Nkomo) to join Zanu, and being the soldier he is, he obeyed that order but his heart was not in Zanu.

“Nkomo told him: ‘pretend you don’t feel your wounds my boy, Zanu will kill all the people if we don’t join them’,” Lesabe said.


Labels: , ,


Read more...

Friday, June 25, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) Devolution: Seperating myth from fact

COMMENT - The MDC is not for greater democracy, but the balkanisation of Zimbabwe, just as the IMF/World Bank are for the balkanisation of the DRC and Sudan. Real decentralisation puts local people in charge of national resources, by decentralizing to the local council level. Decentralization to the provinces only encourages tribalism, especially when done by the likes of the MDC.

Devolution: Seperating myth from fact
24/06/2010 00:00:00
by Methuseli Moyo

AS THE much-awaited constitutional outreach programme finally gets underway, one thematic area that looks set to dominate the public hearings is that of systems of governance, particularly the decentralisation of administration and devolution of power from Harare to regions or provinces.

Virtually every party claims to support “devolution”. Strangely, the main parties, namely, Zanu PF, MDC, MDC-T, and my beloved Zapu, seem to mean different things by “devolution of power”. This could be due to lack of understanding on what devolution really is, or the usual pretence and lack of sincerity by politicians.

I am going to give all the parties the benefit of the doubt and assume they understand what devolution really is. It is clear Zanu PF and MDC-T’s version of devolution as enunciated by their officials and in press reports, is basically not devolution, but some sort of decentralisation or deconcentration of power. Zapu and MDC’s versions of devolution are in my view meaningful, comprehensive, clear and sincere.

The only commonality across the various party positions on systems of governance is that after 130 years of a unitary, centralised state, all feel now is the time to decentralise.

Decentralisation is fundamentally an argument about governance. The screams for decentralisation were sparked by close to 130 years of highly authoritarian rule and centralised governments, starting from the days of Cecil John Rhodes up to date.

Some may argue that centralisation of power started with King Lobhengula when he used iron fist tactics to consolidate his hold on the throne, and expand the boundaries of the Ndebele state. His predecessor, father and founder of the Ndebele nation, King Mzilikazi, shared power with Mambo, as evidenced by the traditional Ndebele song which says kwakubus’uMambo lo Mzilikazi (Mzilikazi and Mambo used to rule together). Clearly, Mzilikazi and Mambo shared power but things changed when Lobhengula and Rhodes entered the scene, and the status quo of centralised rule has remained till this day.

Centralised governments encourage centralized administrative structures which are a major obstacles to people’s participation. These administrative structures retain control over decision making, resource allocation, and the information and knowledge required if people are to play an effective part in development activities.

Similarly, the planning of development programmes and projects is often centralized and planning procedures discourage local involvement. Government planners are invariably a professional group who do not concede their practice to the local level. Most planning takes place in ministries in urban areas and there is rarely any genuine desire to devolve this responsibility effectively to the local level.

According to Oakley, a leading development scholar, in most Third World countries administrative structures are invariably centralized and, by definition, essentially anti-participatory.

It is clear from the on-going debate that some powerful people in the unity government are hostile to the whole notion of reducing central control, devolving decisions to local level and supporting demands made by people for the kinds of radical changes that might be required. Evidence suggests that few governments have willingly devolved bureaucratic controls to the local level.

According to the Human Development Report (1993), Decentralisation can take several forms; it might for example be horizontal or vertical. Horizontal Decentralisation disperses power among institutions at the same level. For example, a government’s spending decisions rather than being concentrated in an all powerful finance ministry, might be spread across different ministries.

Vertical Decentralisation is more powerful. It allows some of the powers of government to be delegated downwards to low tiers of authority. This vertical Decentralisation can itself take three forms. The first one is deconcentration – this is limited to passing down only administrative discretion to local offices of central government ministries. It involves the transfer of workload and selected administrative or decision-making authority and responsibility from the headquarters to lower field-level officials within central government ministries or public agencies.

“It involves the transfer of authority for specific decision-making, financial and management functions by administrative means to different levels under the same jurisdictional authority of the central government.” (Joint UNDP and Government of Germany, 1999:6-7).

Although it does result in some dispersal of power, few decisions can be taken without reference to the centre. In the case of Zimbabwe, an example would be the Ministry of Home Affairs, which has decrentralised the issuance of birth and death certificates, passports, identity cards and marriage certificates to provinces and districts, or the issuance of vehicle license discs to post offices and local authority offices. However, one may still have to go to Harare for some services. In any case, passports are still printed in Harare and the superiors in Harare have final say on any matter.

The other form of Decentralisation is delegation. This involves delegating some authority and decision-making powers to local officials, but central government retains the right to overturn local decisions and can at any time take these powers back. In our case, Minister Ignatius Chombo has overturned countless resolutions made by elected councillors in virtually every other local authority.

Delegation, therefore, is the transfer of government decision-making and administrative authority and/or responsibility for carefully spelled-out tasks to institutions and organisations that are either under government’s indirect control or semi-independent.

Most typically, delegation is by the central government to semi-autonomous organisations not wholly controlled by the government but legally accountable to it.

The third, and most important and talked and strongest form of Decentralisation, is devolution. This is the granting of decision making powers to local authorities and allowing them to take full responsibility, without reference back to central government (UNDP, 1993:6). Through devolution, central government relinquishes certain functions or creates new units of government that are outside its direct control.

Devolution in its purest form has certain fundamental characteristics. First, local units of government are autonomous, independent and clearly perceived as separate levels of government over which central authorities exercise little or no direct control. Secondly, the local governments have clear and legally recognised geographical boundaries within which they exercise authority and perform public functions.

Thirdly, local governments have corporate status and the power to secure resources to perform their functions. Fourthly, devolution implies the need to “develop local governments as institutions” in the sense that they are perceived by local citizens as organisations providing services that satisfy their needs and as governmental units over which they have some influence.

Devolution is an arrangement in which there are reciprocal, mutually-beneficial, and coordinated relationships between central and local governments (Joint UNDP/ Government of Germany: 1999:6).

Development scholars argue that Decentralisation involves the transfer of authority and power to plan, make decisions and manage resources, from higher to lower levels of the organizational hierarchy, in order to facilitate efficient and effective service delivery.

Decentralisation deals with the allocation between center and periphery of power, authority, and responsibility for political, fiscal, and administrative systems.

Deconcentration progressively decreases central control and increases local discretion.

Devolution is associated with more democratic governance and a means to enact and deepen democratic participation.

Democratic Decentralisation may be promoted for a number of reasons -- administrative, fiscal, political or others. The justification for the adoption of some form of Decentralisation is to promote democratic governance and participatory approaches in development. Among the reasons often given is to bring government closer to people and enhance their participation and interaction with local government officers in the affairs of the locality.

The UNDP (1998) points out that Decentralisation or decentralising governance should not be seen as an end in itself, it can be a means for creating more open, responsive, and effective local government and for enhancing representational systems of community-level decision making. By allowing local communities and regional entities to manage their own affairs, and through facilitating closer contact between central and local authorities, effective systems of local governance enable responses to people's needs and priorities to be heard, thereby ensuring that government interventions meet a variety of social needs.

Having explained what Decentralisation and devolution are, I go further to lay bare the form of devolution that Zapu wants. Our party basically wants the country to be divided into five provinces/regions, namely Mashonaland, Masvingo, Midlands, Manicaland and Matabeleland.

Each province/region should have its own elected premier/governor and mini-government. The regional governments will have control over natural resources and environmental issues in their areas of jurisdiction. Each province should also have its own parliament/assembly, judiciary system, and revenue raising system.

Zapu believes five provinces as opposed to the current 10, would be viable. We wonder what benefit the division of Matabeleland into North, South and Bulawayo, and Mashonaland into East, West, Central and Harare has helped, except to create five more vacancies for governorship.

Under devolution, there would still be a central government to maintain territorial integrity and control crucial affairs such as defence, national security, foreign affairs, and international trade. Also, we would still sing the same national anthem, fly the same flag, have one head of state and commander-in-chief, one currency, and have one national sports team.

A National Executive Authority including the President, Deputy President, Speaker of the National House of Assembly, the Prime Minister and the elected Provincial Governors of the Five Provinces shall run the country.

The National Executive Authority will be the supreme decision making body of Zimbabwe. Its duties will be to advise the President on the meaning and implication of old and new legislation before he/she signs it into law; advise the President on all matters of national interest and concern; and advise the President on all senior national government appointments, including appointments of people to constitutionally-entrenched institutions.

Opponents of devolution have mischievously misrepresented it as federalism or cessation. South Africa, which adopted devolution, is undoubtedly the most prosperous and democratic African state. In fact, secessionist and tribalistic tendencies are stronger in unitary states with strong centralised systems like Zimbabwe.

At the end of the day, we all have regions or provinces where we hail from, and our tribesmen back in the village stand to benefit more from a devolved system of governance. Only ignorant people who have been brainwashed by the 130 years of centralised authoritarian rule, or those benefiting from the bambazonke/grab it all syndrome think that devolution is bad.

Finally, let it be known that our party will not accept anything less than devolution in the proposed constitution. Zapu will oppose by any means necessary the adoption of a new constitution without devolution of power.

Methuseli Moyo is the spokesman for Zapu. He can be contacted on e-mail methumoyo@yahoo.co.uk

Labels: , , ,


Read more...

Friday, June 11, 2010

(NEWZIMBABWE) ZAPU slams indigenisation

ZAPU slams indigenisation
by Staff Reporter
11/06/2010 00:00:00

THE opposition ZAPU party has accused President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu PF of using the recently announced economic empowerment regulations to enrich regime cronies before the country adopts a new constitution and holds fresh elections.

Under the country’s empowerment regulations, foreign-owned firms are required to cede at least 51 percent of their shareholding to locals and the government has warned that those failing to comply risked losing their operating licenses.

However ZAPU, which is led by Dumiso Dabengwa – a former senior member of Zanu PF – accused President Mugabe’s party of using the regulations to enrich senior officials before the party is “kicked out of office” at the next elections.

The party said, while it supported the policy of empowering local people, it was opposed to the manner in which “the Inclusive Government, in particular elements of the Zanu-PF establishment, are going about the exercise”.

“It would appear Zanu-PF functionaries in the Inclusive Government are on a spree to allocate the people’s natural resources to their connections under the guise of indigenization.

“Realizing that the sun is setting on their party, Zanu-PF ministers are clearly on a mission to plunder and mortgage people’s resources to foreign companies fronted by their relatives, friends and party supporters,” ZAPU spokesperson Methuseli Moyo said in a statement.

The party also expressed concern over the granting of mining concessions by the mines ministry amid reports that sections of the security services were being permitted to exploit mineral deposits in the country.

“ZAPU notes with concern the goings-on particularly in the Ministry of Mine and Mining Development, where there is a spree to allocate virtually all mining rights and concessions, without any regard to sustainability and future generations.

“We believe Zanu-PF is on a mission to allocate all key natural resources to their cronies before the adoption of a new constitution and the holding of fresh elections, which everyone knows they have no chance of winning,” Moyo said.

He also accused the two MDC formations who are part of the country’s coalition government of being complicit in the plunder of the country’s resources.

“Zapu is disappointed that the two MDCs have simply become appendages of the Zanu-PF establishment and are allowing themselves to be diverted by so-called outstanding issues in the GPA while Zanu-PF plunders people’s resources.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




“It is sad that the two parties have, in our view, become part and parcel of the problem by failing to deduce what the real issues are, and are busy expending their energies on getting jobs for their boys,” Moyo said.

The empowerment regulations – over which the coalition government appears divided - have also spooked investors with some companies privately intimating that they would hold back on planned expansion programmes.

Meanwhile Moyo also warned that foreign investors which go into partnerships under the current arrangements risk losing their investments in the event there was a change of government.

“Zapu takes this opportunity to warn foreigners who are tempted to team up with Zanu-PF functionaries to pillage Zimbabwean resources that the end is nigh and they stand to lose out in the long term when the next government re-establishes political, economic and social order in the country,” he said.

Labels: ,


Read more...

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

(NEWZIMBABWE) ZAPU, MDC in war of words

ZAPU, MDC in war of words
by Lindie Whiz
07/10/2009 00:00:00

A FURIOUS row erupted on Tuesday after an MDC Minister claimed “ZAPU died with Nkomo”, a reference to the late nationalist leader Joshua Nkomo who died in 1999 – 12 years after signing a “unity accord” with President Robert Mugabe’s ZANU.

Water Resources Minister Samuel Sipepa Nkomo told a political rally in Tsholotsho that “people championing the revival of ZAPU should first visit Joshua Nkomo’s grave and wake him up if they want to realise their dreams.”

But ZAPU furiously hit back, accusing the Minister and his MDC party of being “narrow minded” and seeking to “monopolise” political opposition to Mugabe.

“The anti-ZAPU revival crusade has run out of ideas and is sounding illogical and monotonous. They say Joshua Nkomo died with ZAPU, and then say ZAPU is in Zanu PF. Which is which?,” ZAPU’s communications director Methuseli Moyo said in a statement.

A special ZAPU congress in May this year voted to pull out of the pact with Zanu PF, and named Dumiso Dabengwa as interim leader.

ZAPU’s rebirth has excited local politics, particularly in the Matabeleland region where the party commanded massive support before it gave up its name in the 1987 coalition with Mugabe’s ZANU for form Zanu PF.

Sipepa-Nkomo travelled with MDC leader and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai for a series of weekend rallies in Matabeleland North as the party seeks to consolidate its support in the region.

He told a rally at the Tsholotsho Business Centre: “I was there when ZAPU was formed in 1961 and served as secretary for this region stretching from Beitbridge to Victoria Falls, and I can tell you that those pushing for its revival are dubious characters.

“In 1987, the owner of ZAPU (Joshua Nkomo) got into a unity deal with ZANU meaning that ZAPU plus ZANU equals to Zanu PF. If they come to us now and tell us that they want to revive ZAPU, they should go and wake up Nkomo to make that declaration otherwise why should we concern ourselves with ghost parties?”

Sipepa-Nkomo further accused Dabengwa of being a “Zanu PF agent”, and alleged that ZAPU had “a lot of money which we wonder where they are getting it from, because even us as a party do not have that kind of money.”

The comments drew a sharp response from ZAPU which said the attack was “not a surprise because attacking ZAPU has become an industry for political opportunists who have nothing to offer and are intimidated by its revival.”



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The party added: “ZAPU wants to bring to Sipepa-Nkomo and other narrow-minded politicians’ attention that democracy is about plurality of views and political parties. It is sad that there are people who want to monopolise politics and want to give the impression that only they should be allowed to challenge Zanu PF for power.

“For the record, the people of Zimbabwe in general, and the people of Matabeleland that Sipepa-Nkomo mentioned in particular, have risked their lives and limbs giving support to Sipepa-Nkomo’s party, which has failed to translate electoral advantage into political power.

“That is precisely the reason why we have revived ZAPU, because we believe our party has the political muscle, grassroots support, revolutionary attributes and tried and tested leadership to dislodge Zanu PF from power, which we are confident ZAPU will do come election time.

“On the contrary, Sipepa-Nkomo’s MDC-T neither has capable leadership, revolutionary attributes, nor well-rooted support on the ground. The fact that a vacuum in opposition politics has allowed the MDC-T to get this far should not fool anyone that they are a serious national political party. They are not and ZAPU is.”

The statement, signed by Moyo, charged that the MDC was “a political accident created by non-Zimbabweans and fronted locally by plain folks whose narrow-mindedness wants to take us back to the political bickering and violence we witnessed in the past decade.”

Moyo said a two-party system as currently exists in Zimbabwe “leaves the population with no option, and divided into ‘for us or against us’,” and exposes the people to violence and intimidation.

“Any serious thinking person would welcome the arrival of a true political giant like ZAPU to add a third force and thereby extinguish political tensions caused by the two-party system,” Moyo said.

ZAPU said contrary to Sipepa-Nkomo’s claims, it has “no money, no furniture, no office equipment and no vehicles, and the MDC-T has all this in abundance but has failed dismally to remove Zanu PF from power.”

Moyo added: “The fact that our party has achieved political impact of the magnitude displayed by the fear in our opponents even without resources for now speaks volumes of what ZAPU is capable of doing.

“If there is a party that has money it is the MDC-T which sadly is using it negatively to finance doomed regime change projects such as the so-called parallel government.”

ZAPU has said it will contest at least 11 due parliamentary by-elections countrywide whenever they are called -- the first major test of its political strength.

Labels: ,


Read more...

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

(NEWZIMBABWE) ZAPU will contest Mat. by-elections

ZAPU will contest Mat. by-elections
by Lindie Whiz
21/07/2009 00:00:00

THE revived Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU) says it will contest three by-elections triggered by the expulsion of three MPs by the Arthur Mutambara-led MDC. The party said it considered the constituencies of Bulilima East in Matabeleland South and Nkayi South and Lupane East in Matabeleland North as its “traditional home ground”.

“ZAPU is excited by the prospect of a by-election for the House of Assembly for Nkayi South, Lupane East and Bulilima East. ZAPU is geared to enter the race in the three constituencies,” said the party’s director of communications Methuseli Moyo in a statement released on Tuesday.

The MDC announced on Monday it had expelled Nkayi South MP Abednico Bhebhe, Bulilima East legislator Norman Mpofu and Njabuliso Mguni of Lupane East after they were found guilty of misconduct.

The party said it had informed the Speaker of Parliament of its decision. When the Speaker informs the President, he may call a by-election.

Zanu PF and the other MDC formation led by Morgan Tsvangirai are barred from taking part in the by-elections by a power sharing agreement signed on September 15 last year. The deposed MPs can, however, contest as independents or members of other parties.

ZAPU completed a pull-out from a 1997 unity accord with President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu PF party at a congress in May.

Dumiso Dabengwa, a former cabinet minister, was voted as interim leader.
Should the party field candidates in the by-election, it will be its first major test of strength in a region where it enjoyed overwhelming support before the merger with Zanu PF.

Moyo said: “ZAPU calls on all its supporters who strayed into the two MDC formations and are finding life difficult there, and those who are still with Zanu PF, to come back home.

“The revival of the party has been accomplished. The upcoming by-elections will prove to all that ZAPU is back forever."

Labels: , , ,


Read more...

Sunday, June 07, 2009

(NEWZIMBABWE) Zuma rekindles ZAPU alliance

Zuma rekindles ZAPU alliance
by Lindie Whiz
07/06/2009

SOUTH African President Jacob Zuma has moved to recognise the re-emergence of the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU) by inviting the party’s leadership to his home-coming celebrations at his rural Nkandla on Saturday.

ZAPU donated two beasts to Zuma at the massive party attended by some 20,000 people. Zuma, elected as South Africa’s new leader in April, said ZAPU was a strong ally of the South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC).

The South Africa leader also thanked ZAPU for helping the ANC during the liberation struggle, the South Africa Press Association (Sapa) reported.

ZAPU joined President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu PF party in 1987 in a unity pact to end five years of government-sanctioned killings in the south western parts of the country where Joshua Nkomo’s supporters were targeted.

The uneasy partnership with Zanu PF ended last month after ZAPU’s congress in Bulawayo voted to pull out.

ZAPU’s interim chairman Dumiso Dabengwa was at Zuma’s inauguration on May 9. The two men also met in Bulawayo in December when Zuma attended his daughter’s wedding.

The ZAPU-ANC alliance was founded in the mid to late 1960s. The ANC’s military wing Umkhonto Wesizwe assisted ZAPU with military strategy (read ANC-ZAPU armed actions in Rhodesia).

Both ZAPU and the ANC were supported by the Soviet Union during the two countries’ struggle for independence from white minority rule.

Labels: , ,


Read more...

Friday, December 05, 2008

(TALKZIMBABWE) Msika breaks silence about PF Zapu

Msika breaks silence about PF Zapu
Sunday News/Zim Guardian
Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:17:00 +0000

VICE-PRESIDENT Joseph Msika has distanced himself from claims by sections of the media that he was leading the revival of PF Zapu together with former Zipra supremo Dumiso Dabengwa.

Msika said that he was insulted by the invitation to address a Zipra meeting at White City Stadium on December 1, which was meant to revive PF Zapu.

He said the invitation was meant to trap him to make a statement and soon after the attendees to the meeting would declare a pullout from the 1987 Unity Accord signed by Zanu PF and PF Zapu.

Msika said resigned provincial chairperson, Mr Mcleod Tshawe, had something to do with the plan to “trap” him.

“They wanted to trap me at White City. Tshawe was part of the breakaway. I had requested that the meeting be taken to this hall (Davies Hall). He did not listen when I said I don’t want to address them at White City. He was part of the deadwood – part of the non-participators in the Unity Accord.

“They are ex-combatants, yes, but they never participated in unity. They wanted me to go to White City Stadium so that after that they make a statement that they have pulled out of the Unity Accord led by Msika,” the Vice-President said.

Msika also spoke about Dabengwa’s claims that he was never part of Zanu PF and that he has always been “PF Zapu in Zanu PF”.

“Dabengwa amazes me when he says he never agreed with the Unity Accord. He was the Minister of Home Affairs in this same Government. Those who want to follow Dabengwa must follow him,” he said.

Msika said the reason to join Zanu PF in a unity deal was taken by all PF-Zapu structures.

“Zapu sat down as an organisation, the Zapu executive council, and central committee called the Zapu Congress, which included the whole country.

“They were put there by the congress and you cannot remove people from there,” he said.

Cde Msika said efforts to revive PF Zapu were based on ignorance of what the party stood for.

“You don’t just get the name PF Zapu. We were pierced by thorns, healed each other and trudged on. We stayed in prisons. I stayed in prison for 20 years although I was not a cattle thief. That is what Zapu means,” he said.

Msika, who in his slogan emphasised that, “phambili nge Zanu le Zapu,” narrated the history of the liberation struggle and noted how PF Zapu always been united with Zanu PF as the Patriotic Front PF.

“Zapu is not a joke or a party to play with. It is the child of the African National Congress, a big organisation that included all Zimbabweans. Whoever was not in Zapu at that time was a sell out. I always meet some of the people and they have positions and influence now. They are the people who are disturbing us. I am challenging you to get into the structures and work with the leadership.

“Zapu is not a Bulawayo party. It is not a Ndebele party, it is not a Shona party, it is not a Kalanga party, and it is not a Venda party. It belongs to the whole nation. (Late Vice President Joshua) Nkomo was elected by the whole nation. Jason (Moyo), Lazarus Nkala, Chambati, Musarurwa, were those Mandebeles?” he said.

He said Zanu PF is the only authentic liberation movement that came out of the merger of Zanu PF and PF-Zapu.

“Nkomo has told me that I think by the pulse of my heart. He said it was true that Zanu PF broke away from us PF-Zapu and we all know how we felt about it then but we had to give it to them because they had fought hard. We must be able to see beyond our nose,” he said.

He said of all the leaders in Joshua Nkomo’s ANC, he was the only one left and therefore felt he had a responsibility to protect unity among revolutionaries.

“I thank God and the ancestors because they have a reason to keep me and because of that, I will not look aside as the party is prostituted. There is no prostitution in the party; the party has a policy and a document that it follows.

“If you admire the past revolutionaries then you must be more revolutionary than Joshua Nkomo. Most of you are counter revolutionaries, sellouts, surrogates and renegades. These are bad names,” he said.

Msika saluted President Mugabe’s resoluteness in the revolution.

“Between me and Mugabe I must tell you that he visited me at Marondera prison from Ghana and told me that he will commit himself to the struggle like I had done so far. He told me to be strong and he has joined us up to today,” he said.

The Vice president said there was need for political education within the party.

“After restructuring there is need for political education. You have to teach people how to be committed. There is a lot of literature on that. Party members need to learn to put the nation and the party before self interests,” he said.

He said he was aware of allegations that there were people who were going around vote buying ahead of the Provincial Committee elections.

“We have been destroyed by money. I understand there are some people paying rent for others,” he said.

He challenged members in Bulawayo to stop being rude and pretend as if the revolution does not belong to them too, but claim their role in the politics of Zimbabwe.

“We are not apologetic about the revolution. It does not belong to the people in Harare. You are a factor, you are not asking from anyone to participate in this. The revolution started at Stanley Square (at Makokoba) and that is not debatable. It is a historic fact that cannot be disputed. People in Bulawayo should stand up and be counted. Ask for your share of the cake,” he said.

Sunday News/Zim Guardian

Labels: ,


Read more...

Sunday, November 23, 2008

(TALKZIMBABWE) Response to Makahamadze on PF-Zapu revival

Response to Makahamadze on PF-Zapu revival
Mlungisi Nyathi - Opinion
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:43:00 +0000

DEAR EDITOR – I would like to challenge some of the comments posted on your opinions section by Mr. Petros Makahamadze regarding the revival of PF-Zapu. (SEE HERE)

While I agree with his point that the revival of PF-Zapu erodes a very substantial and significant power base of the two MDCs, I find the rest of his article quite insensitive to the facts as they are on the ground in Matabeleland and in Zimbabwe at large.

As an Ndebele person it is often very difficult for me and some my people to write or comment on what I will term the “Matabeleland Question” without getting overly emotional.

The truth of the matter is that three decades after our country Zimbabwe was liberated, Matabeleland remains economically marginalized, and the people in the region continue to feel politically disempowered as somehow Zimbabwe as a nation allowed a silly notion to develop that says the country can never have a President from the minority tribes and that the idea of a Ndebele President is unthinkable.

Somehow in spite of the noble efforts of those who gave us the Unity Accord in 1987, we seem not to have moved much beyond the split in the ZAPU ranks in the sixties that brought about the existence of Zanu-PF. This is why I take issue with what for lack of a better word I will call simplistic views espoused by Mr. Makahamadze article.

The whole point is not about MDC’s powerbase. The MDC is an evil front of imperialist forces that are trying to wriggle their way back into the country from which all Zimbabweans ejected them in 1980. They do not deserve a single mention when examining the Matabeleland Question.

For ten years we have been preoccupied with them pushing their ruinous Anglo-American designed and packaged policies to the extent of forgetting about the reasons Zapu and Zanu formed the Patriotic Front prior to 1980 and the stain on the national conscience that the Unity Accord was designed to blot away.

We have taken for granted the peace and the relative tranquility post 1987 because of the naked power hunger of the MDC whose ideology if they have any is directly opposed to what we fought to achieve in 1980.

The 18th of April 1980 was a culmination of a struggle against imperialist settlers waged not by Zanu-PF but by the combined might of ZIPRA and ZANLA forces.

ZIPRA and ZANLA forces were indeed different sides of the precious coin that bought us our freedom. Think Mkushi and Nyadzonya. Think Masuku and Tongogara and you will soon realize what I am talking about.

It is imperative for the likes of Mr. Makahamadze to grasp the fact that it was people like Dumiso Dabengwa, and Andrew Ndlovu who among others led Zipra’s effort in the war. It is people like Mabhena and others who provided the political leadership. It is these people who on the same level as President Mugabe brought us that liberation from the colonial yoke that people like Morgan Tsvangirai in their folly are trying to through away for selfish personal gains.

Mr. Makahamadze writes “People like Welshman Mabhena (former Zapu secretary general), former war veterans’ leader Andrew Ndlovu, former government minister Thenjiwe Lesabe, Effort Nkomo and Tryphine Nhliziyo are not individuals that could threaten the 1987 agreement. They are all desperate for relevance in Zimbabwean politics”.

I do not know when all these people ever ceased to be relevant to national politics as he suggests. The fact that they were not given any meaningful posts in President Mugabe’s government or in the case of Mabhena, they were actually ejected from the government does not diminish their role as liberators and career revolutionaries.

Instead of casting aspersions at them, we need to revisit the whole Matabeleland Question and genuinely ask ourselves why a man of Dabengwa’s stature would ever contemplate the revival of PF-Zapu when such a move risks taking us back mentally at least to those dark days in which a significant number of people were massacred simply for belonging to the wrong tribe.

Why are the majority of the people there still feeling shafted two decades after the signing of the Unity Accord that was supposed to dispel all tribal animosities?

Why is there a feeling of alienation in Matabeleland and a general sense of political despondency today? Why are some people inhabiting the Midlands and Matabeleland provinces-people who fought and died to liberate Zimbabwe-feeling unloved and discriminated in their own country to the extent of going for the nuclear option of pulling PF-Zapu out of the bottom drawer in order to try and get to have a meaningful say on national affairs?

Without addressing the above questions the political temperatures will continue rising in that corner of the country leading eventually to a spontaneous outburst of violence as seen in places like Rwanda. Indeed it might seem wild if not mischievous for me to make such a point but let us remember that for years the Tutsi and the Hutu lived side by side intermarried and co-existed peacefully in both Rwanda and Burundi before some people exploited their divisions for political ends leading to the catastrophic genocide of the 1990’s.

By dismissing the dismay and dissatisfaction felt by the Ndebele, Kalanga, the Tonga, the Venda and other peoples in Western Zimbabwe, we are leaving our nation vulnerable to foreign influences.

Is it not conceivable that one day a maverick neighbour like Ian Khama could seek at the behest of imperialists to utilize this dissatisfaction to interfere in the affairs of our nation?

We have already witnessed how the Botswana government has shamelessly tried to bolster the MDCs morally bankrupt crusade against our revolutionary heritage. What’s to stop such people tapping into the anger residing in the hearts of thousands of Ndebele people who survived the “moment of madness” as President Mugabe puts it, or the children of those who perished who till today cannot get a birth certificates because they cannot prove that their parents are dead?

I know quite a number of people living with such a predicament. Without the birth certificate they cannot get an identity card without which they cannot get their names on the voters roll. In simple terms they are disenfranchised in the land of their birth. This is just one example of the issues that make up the Matabeleland Question.

Only President Mugabe and the old guard in Zanu-PF have the power to examine and rectify these things before they leave the political stage. Political coxcombs in the MDC were they to miraculously emerge as our rulers tomorrow would lack the political sophistication and insight to deal with these matters. We need the President and his peers to sort this one out. Writers like Mr. Makahamadze must examine and explore the Matabeleland Question in depth before they make sweeping statements on it.

Mlungisi Nyathi

Labels: ,


Read more...

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

(TALKZIMBABWE) Zapu revival, a headache for the MDC

Zapu revival, a headache for the MDC
Petros Makahamadze – Opinion
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:36:00 +0000

DEAR EDITOR – The breakaway faction of PF Zapu presents a dilemma, not for Zanu PF, but for the Movement for Democratic Change party who have won elections in Matabeleland since 2000.

The MDC should realize that their reign in Matabeleland is coming to an end if this faction ever regroups and is strong enough to make a mark.

PF Zapu and Zanu PF share the same roots and concerns. They might have their disagreements, but the history of the struggle for Zimbabwe binds them. Their ideologies are also not very different, that’s why they have been able to work in harmony for the last 21 years.

In any case the two parties are now inseparable. Their structures have been cemented over the two decades the Unity Accord has existed. They were never separated by regionalism or tribalism as many people would like us to believe.

The late Dr Joshua Nkomo even testified to this in an BBC interview with Jeremy Paxman in 1983.

These two parties have a solid history and respect the national question before any other question. They both despise imperialism and neo-colonialism and can never be subservient to Western interests.

Those people in the media fraternity who are trying to score points by overplaying the divisions within the united Zanu PF should consider the elements involved in the “resuscitation” of PF Zapu.

Zapu has never completely died. There has always been a faction of Zapu alive somewhere and this renewed effort is backed by individuals who are not in the mainstream unity agreement of 1987.

Paul Siwela’s super-Zapu has existed for a long time, but it never threatened the 1987 Unity Accord.

Dumiso Dabengwa will be a lone figure should this latest antic of his fails to take off. I do not see how it will take off. Former PF Zapu elements currently in Zanu PF would be out of their minds to walk away after 21 years.

After failing to score any successes with Dr Simba Makoni, Dabengwa’s desperation is now showing and is clouding his better judgment. What exactly will he be benefiting from the revival of PF Zapu, except to make a symbolic political gesture?

PF Zapu elements pushing for the revival of the party are no major threat to the 1987 Unity Accord. They have been in the political wilderness for a long time.

People like Welshman Mabhena (former Zapu secretary general), former war veterans’ leader Andrew Ndlovu, former government minister Thenjiwe Lesabe, Effort Nkomo and Tryphine Nhliziyo are not individuals that could threaten the 1987 agreement. They are all desperate for relevance in Zimbabwean politics.

If they ever become big, which I doubt very much, they will only threaten Tsvangirai’s dominance in Matabeleland, but can never threaten the united Zanu PF, if truth is to be told.

Petros Makahamadze
London

Labels: , ,


Read more...