Reclaiming the Land: Land Reform and Agricultural Development in Zimbabwe:
An Interview with Sam Moyo by Gregory Elich
Amid the economic crisis in Zimbabwe, the agricultural sector continues to struggle. Although the plunge in agricultural output over the last few years has often been commented on in the Western media, little or no attention is paid to the complex factors contributing to that decline.
Instead, matters are reduced to a simple generalization. It is rare to be presented with information from someone with direct involvement with the agricultural sector in Zimbabwe. Sam Moyo has over 25 years of research experience in rural development issues, and his organization has conducted studies and analyses and provided policy recommendations on land policy. Highly respected in his profession, Moyo is uniquely positioned to offer an evidence-based overview of the situation.
Elich: You are the Executive Director of the African Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS). What is the aim of your organization and what is its role in supporting agricultural development in the continent?
Moyo: The aim of AIAS is to work with key actors throughout Africa to enhance the capacity to develop and implement equitable agrarian policies and to promote sustainable land use in support of marginalized groups by undertaking research, policy analysis, training, and dialogue.
The role is to mediate in the policy making process, so as to enhance rural livelihoods through an improved policy framework. In its work, the Institute interacts with and provides policy advice and capacity support to various stakeholders, who include governments, regional bodies, universities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) researchers, students, and the donor community.
Elich: Although much has been written in the West about agriculture in your home country of Zimbabwe, reports tend to be heavy on emotion and light on concrete information. You and your organization continue to play an important role in the study and development of agriculture in Zimbabwe through research, analysis, and policy recommendations. You are well qualified to fill the information gap for a Western audience, so I would like to focus on that topic for this interview.
Let's start by discussing land reform. There was a market-based land reform in place before Zimbabwe embarked upon a more radical program. Why was this path chosen? The popular attitude in the West is that the land was best left in the hands of the few white commercial farmers.
Moyo: The market-based approach was sensu stricto the only approach followed between 1980 and 1992, for the following reasons.
The market approach was a result of the Lancaster House constitution, which emphasized that approach, and allowed for expropriation (for specific public purposes) under stringent and costly conditions. The latter included full market pricing of compensation, and in a forex (foreign exchange) currency of the choice of the landholder. This constitutional clause could not be altered until 1990. At the Lancaster negotiation, Western funding of the market-based process was promised by the key brokers of the settlement (UK and USA). The UK provided significant funds for this (44 million pounds), particularly up to 1989, and this was co-financed with the GoZ (Government of Zimbabwe) to secure 3 million hectares out of the 15 million hectares held by large farmers; but the USA did not fund land. The policy (concept) of 'reconciliation' (racial and political) was assumed to lead to a spirit of land sharing through negotiated transfer. But racial polarization and land and wealth concentration continued instead. Some GoZ technocrats believed the market would deliver more land (but this was not to be, as mainly abandoned and marginal land was sold) at reasonable prices (again not to be), and there was limited access to capital for state and private purchase within the broader social reform program.
The radical approach to land reform was initiated in terms of the constitution, land laws, and the policy framework during 1990 and 1992 and was implemented as follows. A small-scale attempt at land expropriation in 1993 (30 farms) and 1995 (100 farms) was largely defeated by landholder litigations.
These processes fueled an increased hostility between landholders, whites, and business on the one hand, and blacks in general, government, war veterans, and the landless on the other hand.
Antagonism between the UK and Zimbabwe governments over a new phase of funded land reform emerged, with failure to agree to the new program which had been agreed by UK's John Major. An effort to get large land holders and government to agree to land transfers through joint identification of land for transfer was started in 1995, but this ended in disagreements, leading to the GoZ producing its own list of 1,700 farms to be designated for expropriation. There was a refusal by the Blair government in 1997 to honor the Conservative government's proposal of 1996, and broader confrontations between the GoZ and international donors over the failed ESAP (Economic Structural Adjustment Program) led to failure in 1996 to sign a new ESAP (called ZIMPREST).
Other factors driving the radical approach were internal 'rebellion' by war veterans within ZANU-PF demanding compensation for war losses and pensions, as well as impatience over access to 20% of the land to be redistributed; expansion of the indigenous (nationalist) bourgeoisie who also sought land; greater landlessness and urban retrenchees seeking land in rural areas, and their resort to scattered "illegal" land occupations; the designation of 1,471 farms (4 million hectares) for expropriation in 1997, and the 'defeat' of this effort by large farmer litigations in 1997 and 1998; and the mobilization by war veterans, with rural leaders (traditional leaders/chiefs; spirit mediums; other rural war veterans and some landless people) in areas already mobilized over land grievances, towards land occupations in 30 sites throughout Zimbabwe by 1998.
There was also a general political radicalization of ZANU-PF and nationalists over reforms in Zimbabwe in view of the resurgence of white farmer and business political mobilization against land reform and in support of a new political opposition party (the MDC). Heightened political polarization emerged from Western criticism and withholding of loans/aid, while supporting the MDC and embedded NGOs, beginning with the constitutional Reform process (1999-2000) and in subsequent elections. The failure of the 1998 donor conference to deliver land and/or funding for a market-based reform also contributed. The radical land reform process was further entrenched during 2000 and 2003, due to intense political conflict and electoral contests over land reform, including further grievances emerging from the imposition of sanctions on and the isolation of Zimbabwe.
As for the Western attitude that the land should have been left to whites, this belief is also held by some in the middle and capitalist classes in Zimbabwe too. But this has been unfounded and rejected by nationalists and peasants because past policies favored large farmers and support to new farmers was minimal. Banks and agribusiness were tied into the large farming system and international support to small black farmers was minimal. Access to good land infrastructure was not balanced to black farmers. Moreover the white farmers increasingly produced less of the food needs of the majority, while income concentration perpetuated an imbalanced home market and consumption.
Elich: In the context of domestic political polarization, Western interference, and the imposition of sanctions, fast-track land reform could hardly have had more inauspicious circumstances for its launch. Historically on the world scene, the success of land reform efforts have hinged to a significant degree on the ability to supply sufficient inputs (loans, tools, fertilizer, training) to resettled farmers. But access to foreign exchange has been severely constrained by Western sanctions. Zimbabwe has also had unfavorable climatic conditions in recent years.
None of this gets much mention in Western media. Instead it is pointed out that agricultural output was bountiful when most of the best land was in the hands of white commercial farmers, but since fast-track land reform the government has had to import food to avert starvation. It is implied that black farmers are incompetent or ineffective and that the land did better when it was held in so-called "capable" hands.
You've closely studied agricultural production in Zimbabwe. What are your thoughts on the reasons for the decline in food production and the Western perception of that?
Moyo: This question is complex and needs a nuanced response.
To begin with, close to 70% of the food consumed by the 80% of Zimbabweans who are the working classes (peasants, formal and informal wage workers, the unemployed) and over 50% of the middle class foods, which comprise mainly grains (maize, sorghum, groundnuts and pulses as oils or for direct eating) and local relish (greens) have always been produced by the peasants and urban residents' gardens. Apart from feeding themselves (65% of the population), the peasants sold over 70% of the marketed grain and groundnuts and the little locally produced rice (over 90% of which was always imported). Secondly, peasants provided most indigenous fruits (Mazhanje, Masawi, etc.), as well as most of the meat and milk consumed in rural areas.
True, large white farmers produced and sold most of the higher protein-value, largely urban-consumed, foods: milk and dairy products; wheat; temperate fruits and jams (apples, oranges, etc.), tea and coffee, sugar, meat (beef, poultry, and pork products), and oils and fats (from soya beans, sunflower, and so forth). The middle and upper urban-based classes consumed most of this LSCF (Large-Scale Commercial Farm) production.
However, most of the poor urban working class transferred money to peasant producers, who kept some for their family members and supplied them with part of their food. There was a clear division of production between peasants and large farmers, with the former producing most of the cheaper and bulkier foods, and the latter producing the rest of the foods, much of which was consumed by a few people.
Moreover, by far the largest outputs (in volumes and value) produced by large farmers were destined for exports (tobacco, sugar, tea, coffee, horticulture, beef, etc.) and for the local industry (soaps, etc.). Although their exports were critical for forex (40% of national forex was from agriculture, but peasants produced 80% of the cotton and its attendant forex), they were not the main supplier of the food consumed by most of the population, who could not afford their products.
These are the social and structural facts of the previous unequal income and consumption situation.
However, we must still explain why the bulky low-income foods are in short supply (maize especially)! Well, it is mainly because of the decline in seed and fertilizer supply, and reduced private and external financing. During the last eight years the country also experienced four substantial droughts, with signs of climatic change or higher variability in rainfall. The previous season was one such year, coupled with extremely low input supplies. This trend has led to reduced rain-fed maize production by the peasantry, as 90% of the irrigation resources were and are still held by large farmers, including the sugar estates. Peasants have thus experienced a loss of their own seed and cash resources, which has undermined their production cycle. Various other constraints have been experienced in a context of economic decline and sanctions: fuel shortages and high global prices affected the transport and plowing processes; electricity shortages limiting irrigation and fertilizer production processes; and reduced government revenues limiting state support to peasants, and so forth. This occurred in the face of limited aid to small farmers largely because of the political standoff at the international level.
Elich: That brings me to my next question. What advice are you and the AIAS providing to the government of Zimbabwe in regard to agriculture? Obviously, a timely and sufficient provision of seed and fertilizer is essential, but there are hindrances. There is also a shortage of fuel, farming implements, irrigation schemes, and financial assistance. Under the circumstances, I assume that any recovery plan is going to have relatively modest short-term goals and a more ambitious long-range plan. And finally, what results would you anticipate from a successful establishment of a government of national unity?
Moyo: We have argued for a greater effort to support small farm producers with subsidized seeds and inputs for food production, and measures to improve their marketing of products as a primary step. This includes some levels of decontrolling the pricing of staple foods, so that producers get a better price, and to cut out usurious middle persons. Extension services and information on inputs and related services need to be enhanced through creative measures. A revised strategy for smallholder farming development, combined with a transformative social protection policy agenda (subsidies for rural health, education, etc.), is required to rebuild the rural economy and national food security.
An agro-industrial sector recovery program is also necessary, contrary to those who seek to use the situation to finish off existing under-utilized capacities through their calls for full-scale de-protection and liberalization as a condition for refinancing the country. Since local fertilizer production is also hampered by shortages of forex to import raw materials and by electricity shortages, this has had to be imported while capacities still exist but are forex-starved due to shortages. This applies to the variety of agro-industries (veterinary materials, agricultural chemicals, and machinery and equipment, etc.). The available forex resources have been spread widely across the economy, rather than prioritized on agro-industry and smallholder food production. The last droughts reduced small producer incomes, let alone savings, such that effective "demand" for inputs is low and this limits the recovery of agro-industrial production, too.
Moreover, we have always called for humanitarian aid to assist the recovery of small producers, but this has not materialized. It has certainly not been prioritized by donors, although to some extent the government has not been helpful by limiting the operations of some NGOs. What is required is less belligerence on both sides and agreement on a constructive and less politicized approach to aid by both sides. After all most African countries, including those performing well in food production (e.g. Malawi, etc.), receive such aid.
Yes, besides these shorter-term measures, a comprehensive development plan needs to be put in place on the basis of wider national consensus, which the inclusive government could promote. This will hinge on how to refinance the economy in the medium to long term, including from new sources of state revenue (e.g. from dividends that could be gotten from existing and new mining investments, increased collection of taxes from the now informalized formal sectors whose production is below capacity), from new investments (especially in mining if suitable terms are negotiated), and from concessional loans and credit. In general the balance of payments deficit means that government has been operating on a restricted cash budget and making ad hoc allocations of forex as pressing needs surface. Broader international support (e.g. besides the west, including from SADC, China, Venezuela, etc.) could be sought to widen the terms of borrowing and therefore integration into a wider world economy. The planning should become more coherent and transparent, and thus reduce corruption in the public and private sphere. For in the inflationary context finance capital has been happier to trade speculatively on money and other imported goods which give them quicker and higher returns, while charging markups of above 100%.
The inclusive government might enable the government to procure long-term concessional loans and credit on better conditions. However the signs from the International Financial Institutions and donors is that they would wait for certain political guarantees and would want full-scale liberalization to release money. The inclusive government might also get more humanitarian aid to pay for health, sanitation, HIV-AIDS, and education, thus releasing some resources to pay for agricultural inputs and the maintenance of related infrastructures.
The recovery in the medium term will depend on political "normalization" relating to a new economic situation, which accepts the current land redistribution while reducing some of the remaining and new land holding inequalities, including accommodating some of the former land owners on smaller farms -- like their new counterparts, on the principle of equitable land rights and not privilege. The thrust would be to attempt to build on the new configuration of property relations in agriculture, mining, and industry (including the new small and medium scale enterprises in all these sectors, and the emerging state mining ventures). This requires the removal of sanctions (which many continue to deny exist, let alone recognize their social effects) and the depolarization/de-demonization of the Zimbabwe "crisis" at the international level. To the extent that pressure is reduced on forex to import key goods, the speculative economy could be dampened, thus limiting some of the inflationary behavior. Removing sanctions is also critical to encouraging the investors to revive industries and mines, and to allow "investors" to continue with their plans.
There is no doubt that the issue of compensating former landowners for some degree of their losses for their improvements on the land, in realistic terms, will have to be negotiated in order to put to rest the land transfer process. The UK would have to be drawn in on this, and other donors might participate. This is a position that SADC has proposed, and is etched into the recent agreement on the inclusive government signed by the political parties. We have advised that government takes this issue up and enhances public knowledge on the issues involved, so as to garner broadly based support for any decisions taken.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sam Moyo is a land policy analyst and Executive Director of the African Institute for Agrarian Studies. He is also chairperson of the ZERO Regional Environment Organization, based in Harare, and a former director of the Southern African Regional Institute for Policy Studies of the Sapes Trust. Among his published works are two recent books that he co-edited: Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and Land and Sustainable Development in Africa. Gregory Elich is the author of Strange Liberators: Militarism, Mayhem and the Pursuit of Profit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment | Trackback | Print
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labels: AIAS, AIR ZIMBABWE, GREGORY ELICH, LAND REFORM, SAM MOYO
Read more...
Nullity of Dora’s deals
Written by C Mbwili
Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:21:00 PM
I wish to express suprise at the fact that we all appear to be overlooking certain aspects of our laws.
Unless our laws, rules and regulations are wrong, I wish to point out that whatever Dora may have signed, if she skipped any part of the due process, it is automatically a nullity and does not require any ‘authority’ to pronounce it as such.
Nullification is automatic going by my deduction of the regulations governing tender procedures, and those who flout the procedures are automatically subject to disciplinary action going by magnitude and extent.
And considering the fact that efforts were made to help matters in the communications minister’s case, she has to be made to answer with immediate effect. That said, I wish to seek guidance from the ACC on why they have remained mute and have not moved in Dora's direction as they have done on the FRA CEO whose matter came up after. If the MMD government is of men and not laws, our land is and the MMD government happens to be on it, be reminded.
I further wish to remind all those in the government that the President will not protect you in your misdeeds, as evidenced by the process explained by the former vice-president Enoch Kavindele in Wednesday’s Post edition. I am calling on civil society and all Zambians to exercise diligence on this matter, you have a duty.
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/5106/64/
Dora, exculpate yourself
Written by Dorothy Mwanza
Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:20:15 PM
I would really like to thank The Post for continued vigilance in exposing corrupt and highly questionable deeds of those we have entrusted with our resources. Their deeds can be likened to cankerworms that keep feeding on our harvests, leaving people hungry and poor. It is very easy for many people to dismiss as sour grapes what has emerged from The Post emanating from the demise of Zambian Airways.
I wish to implore Zambians to rise above petty conclusions and critically analyse what has been revealed concerning tender procedures involving huge sums of money that have been disregarded with impunity.
It is clearly amazing that despite all these revelations, to date we have not been given any satisfactory explanation to warrant these actions except that of Rupiah, saying Siliya is smarter than many who are questioning her. If these people truly consider themselves as our servants, they need to exculpate themselves to their bosses (citizens) for the allegations that have been levelled against them. It is important that leaders be held accountable and no one will do it for us.
It is not wrong to demand an explanation nor does it mean that you hate Dora if you did so. Where is the Oasis Forum? Where is the Women's Lobby Group? Where are the mother church bodies? Why haven't you demanded an explanation? Men and women of Zambia, we need to stand up and demand the truth. If The Post is lying and just rumour-mongering, then let Dora come out and explain.
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/4986/64/
Rupiah’s support for Siliya on Zamtel
Written by Mateo
Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:19:22 PM
The comments made by President Rupiah Banda on the sourcing of the strategic
partner for Zamtel makes me sad and wonder whether the President has the interest of the nation at heart.
Inasmuch as we cannot dispute the fact that Zamtel is technically insolvent, our question as Zambians is, why were the proper tender procedures not followed?
We want the President to answer on the rare credibility of RP Capital which made them not to be given an opportunity to compete with other bidders.
In this light, we are saying we are not ready to give Dora Siliya a chance for as long we smell a rat in the manner the tender was awarded to RP Partners.
Our other worry as Zambians is that there is a possibility of under-valuing Zamtel and the same people might not find a buyer and instead want their own company to come and buy Zamtel cheaply.
How patriotic is the minister on this matter?
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/5025/64/
Dealings of Rupiah’s sons
Dealings of Rupiah’s sons
Written by C Mbwili, Lusaka
Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:17:50 PM
While we appreciate that President Rupiah Banda’s children are adults and independent, we need to be alive to the fact that there is a matter of undue advantage when relatives of high-standing officials participate in these deals.
The officers handling the matters are exposed to certain pressure to appease the ruling authority through favours to these relatives. I am certain now Rupiah’s children can visit any ministry and they will access it without any appointment, taking advantage of the nature of African political foolishness.
Why is Rupiah treating his children’s dealings with the goverment differently from the incarcerated former ZAF commanders' daughters' company providing services to ZAF? Government is an institution like any other of which the President is the managing director and we are aware of the ethics that go with family members of the MD dealing with the institution he is heading.
If there is no law governing the President’s family members’ use of pecuniary advantages, then something must be done. However, a reasonable father should caution his children as such bad publicity indicates they are treading in murky waters. Why should the whole President allow his children to be the subject of discussion in two scandalous dealings within a week. Lead your children from temptation, Rupiah, or they will perish with you.
It shows Rupiah has mental challenges that come with old age, as he had told us a few weeks back, and if he can’t manage his children how will he manage Dora and her sort? As for the Banda children, you are adults and will be dealt with as such by the Task Force when your time comes as you are not the first nor last president’s children.
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/5107/64/
Rupiah and his sons’ deals
Written by Concerned citizen
Rupiah Banda must not treat the issue of his son’s behaviour lightly. He must not make him close his eyes and ears to the urgent need for him to put his house in order.
Whether he likes it or not, some people strongly believe in the ‘Like father like son’ saying. If Rupiah fails to correct his son’s behaviour, will we find it easy to believe that he is different from them?
In some countries when the president or king leaves office, one of his sons takes over. Common sense has it that such a son must be presidential material. If Rupiah fails to preside over his sons, how can he be the President of Zambia worth his salt and what could be the effect of this failure on the country? How can we vote for Rupiah or anyone else of his type in 2011?
We don't want Rupiah's sons or Rupiah himself to have a bad name. We haven't forgotten how Castro Chiluba behaved because according to his stupidity he thought he was a tiny president of Zambia as well. May that ugly history not repeat itself.
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/5103/64/
GMO import scam
Written by Concerned citizen
Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:13:58 PM
The importation of GMO maize and subsequent statement made by the President, Mr Rupiah Banda, as reported by The Post of Febraury 10, 2009 is extremely worrying. Properly interpreted, the statement confirms that the President is pro-GMO. As a country, we risk uncontrolled inflows of GMOs.
This is a disaster to this country and should be stopped forthwith by all Zambians who love this country.
GMOs are not a solution to the current maize crisis. Instead, we risk compounding this crisis up to unmanageable levels. Acceptance of GMO maize will impact negatively on Zambia ’s agricultural development in terms of production and export marketing. Small-scale agriculture will be severely affected while issues of environmental contamination are beyond our comprehension.
Up to this time, even developed Europe has adopted a cautious approach towards GMOs. Why should Zambia, which has no capacity to create or accept another crisis that it cannot manage.
Issues of food security and safety are extremely important and cannot be solved overnight by accepting GMOs. Again, we have no capacity or resources to monitor the impact of GMOs on food security and food safety.
Levy Mwanawasa, the departed great son of Zambia made responsible decisions and demonstrated that this country can feed itself. One year after experiencing severe maize shortages, Zambia produced a bumper harvest in 2006 and recorded a surplus. We can do it again without resorting to GMOs as long as the leadership is focused. I am sure Levy’s government made enough consultation and research on this matter such that we do not need to revisit this issue just now. It will be a complete waste of our meagre resources.
I salute all the institutions and individuals who ensured that the GMO maize was repatriated to RSA.
Zambians, let’s not allow a clique of incorrigibles to feed us on food whose safety is qestionable. We are not guinea pigs in a laboratory.
Through Mwanawasa, Zambians said no to GMOs.
May God bless and deliver our country from careless, selfish and irresponsible leadership.
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/4985/64/
Rupiah’s trips
Written by Edwin Zulu
Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:12:49 PM
The President has travelled a lot in the three
months he has been in office.
He has been to Nigeria, South Africa, Libya, Ethiopia, Botswana and now he is in Tanzania.
With due respect, I think he must sit down and consider working on the problems people are facing in the country than travel so many times in a short time.
If there is anything of prime importance, he can send his vice or indeed invite his counterparts to Zambia.
These trips are at the tax payers’ expense. If the President has to succeed, he must get down to work and results will show.
He was with the Tanzanian President a few days ago in Ethiopia; why didn’t they discuss matters of national importance there?
US President Barack Obama has been in office for a month and has not travelled, he is busy trying to repair the economy and better the lives of the American people.
Zambians are living in abject poverty and amid job losses, it is time the President and his Cabinet found solutions for the people.
I think he would have travelled more than any president we have ever had by the time he finishes his term of office.
http://www.postzambia.com/content/view/4911/64/
Police brutality
Written by HC – Ndola.
It is a very sad situation the way the police are handling citizens nowadays. I don’t know if we are living in a police state or not. I believe that there is procedure and a system with regard to dealing with people that break the law. What is really sad is that there seems to be no regard for human rights by the police in Zambia.
The picture on the front page of Saturday Post ( February 7, 2009) is sad indeed. The overzealous police officers beat up innocent citizens whose only crime was to go and show solidarity with their leader.
Looking at that ‘war face’ of the officer in sunglasses, I wonder if he would do the same if he were sent to Darfur because that’s where such energy is required.
If taxi and minibus drivers are unruly, then the traffic officers are worse. Somebody tell me, maybe I’m missing the point here, is this the new police service that has been introduced to serve us better? I would like to appeal to the Inspector General of Police to discipline his officers because I believe as a tax- payer, I pay them to protect me and not to harass me.
Labels: CORRUPTION, GMO, MAIZE, POLICE BRUTALITY
Read more...
Dora is lying
Written by Editor
Government leaders are expected to tell the truth all the time. However difficult things might be, it is better to tell the truth or shut up instead of entangling oneself in a web of deceit.It looks like no one has told Dora Siliya the saying about what a tangled web one weaves when they decide to deceive. It is easy to sound coherent and intelligent when telling lies. The coherence and intelligence cannot last because lies cannot defeat truth.
Dora’s ministerial statement in Parliament yesterday proves that all is not well at the Ministry of Communications and Transport. Dora has decided to defend her wrongs with half-truths and blatant lies. We are not surprised because this is what arrogance does. It fools people into thinking that they are the best or the most intelligent and the rest of the people around are stupid and dull, and not able to see through their evil schemes.
Government exists to serve the people and not the other way round. Government officers are required to be accountable and transparent in all their dealings on behalf of the people. This is the standard that we expect Dora to achieve.
Last week in Parliament, Dora was asked to explain how RP Capital of Cayman Island were engaged for US $2 million to provide valuation services for Zamtel. This question arose after we had exposed the fact that Dora had signed an agreement with RP Capital in disregard of legal advice from the Attorney General’s chambers and tender procedures.
This is the issue that the nation wants to know about. No amount of sophistry and obfuscation will help Dora. She simply needs to answer the question. To try and link the editor of this newspaper to the engagement of RP Capital is simply stupid – it is dishonest and meant to hoodwink the people. If Dora is convinced that The Post has anything to do with her criminal disregard of government tender processes, let her say it as a private citizen and not hide behind the immunity that Parliament affords her.
We say what we say without hiding behind any privilege or immunity. We believe that Dora is engaged in criminal abuse of office in her conduct regarding Zamtel.
Does she think that the Zambian people are fools and cannot see her lies? To say that she single-sourced RP Capital because they are the only ones who expressed an interest to value Zamtel is simply stupid. By the way, the word stupid is not an insult. It simply means “showing a lack of thought or a lack of good judgement”, both of which definitions are true in relation to Dora.
She is talking as though she were talking to children. If, as Dora suggests, RP Capital were the only ones who expressed an interest to value Zamtel, when did government invite expressions of interest for companies to value Zamtel? How did RP Capital just wake up in England and decide that Zamtel in Zambia needed valuation?
Indeed, to obfuscate her criminal abuse of office, Dora led Parliament to believe that the other companies that showed interest in Zamtel wanted to buy its assets without valuing them. And in this connection, she said the editor of this newspaper had expressed an interest in the fourth mobile licence.
How Dora managed to link the fourth mobile licence advertised by the Communications Authority of Zambia in national newspapers on February 1, 2008 and the problems she has with her abuse of office in signing a contract contrary to the Attorney General’s advice and tender procedures is beyond belief and shows her criminal intent.
The fourth mobile licence was advertised publicly and Postlink, a company owned by Post Newspapers Limited, applied for it because it complimented its Internet provision business. The Communications Authority of Zambia stopped the process of awarding the fourth mobile licence after Mr Enoch Kavindele sued to enforce an award made earlier to Vodacom Zambia, a company he controlled.
For Dora to suggest that the fourth mobile license has anything to do with the privatisation of Zamtel is stupid, dishonest and unbelievable. To suggest that Fred M’membe applied for a cellular licence is to deliberately tell lies and mislead Parliament in order to avoid answering questions for her abuse of office.
Dora has gotten used to telling lies and getting away with it. Let her tell Parliament the truth about the fourth mobile licence and show how relevant it is to RP Capital. When people are caught pants down, they start clutching at straws. And this is what Dora is doing.
Instead of dealing with her disregard for the Attorney General’s advice, she wants to blame The Post and its editor for her criminal conduct.
We know that Zambia has many problems that require solutions from the government. But this should not allow anyone to ignore the law. Procurement frauds are a very common form of corruption, which is why we have the Zambia National Tender Board to bring some sanity to what would otherwise be a feast for vultures.
However, it seems Dora has decided that when it suits her, she can ignore any law or tender process. Yesterday, she told Parliament that she did not ignore the Attorney General’s advice. What she did not do is explain to Parliament how she followed the Attorney General’s advice.
Anyone reading the Attorney General’s advice will agree that it was meant to protect public resources and ensure the respect for the rule of law. Only a criminally-minded person will ignore legal advice from the Attorney General.
What benefit will a normal person get from ignoring the Attorney General? Why would a government minister not respect such sound legal advice?
It is clear from the Attorney General’s letter of January 5, 2009 that Dora had ignored the Attorney General’s advice in the letter dated November 21, 2008 and December 5, 2008 which was written by the Solicitor General. Is Dora now telling the nation that after being given this written legal advice, the Solicitor General gave her verbal or written authorisation to ignore the legal advice contained in his letter?
Is Dora so stupid as to believe that the Solicitor General can allow her to disregard the law? She has not begun to explain who RP Capital are, where they came from, who their local agents were. Why is Dora not explaining the role that President Rupiah Banda’s son Henry played?
Now Dora tells us that she has got the power to single-source up to K7 billion. We would like to see the law that allows ministers to overrule their ministries’ tender committees and single-source contracts up to K7 billion. This is madness!
Dora tells us that she can do K7 billion alone. Even if that were the case, the RP Capital contract is a minimum of K10 billion. She is also saying that this money is not yet paid and so there is no problem. What nonsense! She has signed a contract to pay K10 billion. Where does she draw that authority?
To say that she has merely entered a memorandum of understanding (MoU) and not an agreement further proves her stupidity. She has agreed to pay K10 billion and these RP Capital have already come. How can she say there is no agreement when the MoU came into force on December 22, 2008? As the Attorney General’s chambers observed, the MoU even contains dispute resolution mechanisms. If it is not a binding contract, why would there be a dispute resolution mechanism?
These same RP Capital people are supposed to value and get paid US $2 million for the services, after which they should find a buyer and get paid five per cent of the purchase price.
Parliament should not allow itself to be hoodwinked. They should demand all the documents and read them for themselves, and not listen to Dora’s apocryphal accounts. She is lying!
For Dora to say that freedom of the press is the problem in this issue is further proof of her stupidity. The problem is not The Post. The problem is her abuse of office.
Dora Siliya’s arrogance will be her downfall. Today, Dora could be hiding under Rupiah Banda’s wings but tomorrow she will be on her own to answer for her misdeeds.
And there is no need for her to start smearing other people with filth instead of explaining her misdeeds.
Labels: CORRUPTION, DORA SILIYA, FRED M'MEMBE, PRIVATISATION, RP CAPITAL PARTNERS, THE POST
Read more...
Siliya defends contract with RP Capital
Written by Ernest Chanda
Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:54:22 PM
COMMUNICATIONS and transport minister Dora Siliya yesterday told Parliament that RP Capital Partners of the United Kingdom was the only company that expressed interest in valuating the assets of Zamtel.
Delivering her ministerial statement on a point of order raised by Kantanshi Patriotic Front (PF) member of parliament Yamfwa Mukanga concerning the engagement of RP Capital Group and what tender procedures were followed to value Zamtel assets, Siliya said the other companies which had expressed interest wanted to purchase majority shareholding in Zamtel without valuating the parastatal company.
"This House will recall that my ministerial statement in September 2008 over Zamtel indicated that the way forward would be found before the end of 2008. Many companies approached us with an interest to purchase majority share holding in Zamtel. Others applied for a whole new mobile licence. After various consultations, it was clear that the immediate task for the ministry was to undertake a valuation of the assets of Zamtel to ascertain the true value of the company on the open market," Siliya stated.
"The House and the general public may wish to know that none of the companies alluded to earlier, expressed interest to undertake the valuation exercise except RP Capital. As provided for in the Public Procurement Act no. 12 of 2008 RP Capital Group was selected on the basis of limited selection tender process. Pursuant to circular no. 1 of 2009 effective 12 December 2008, the ministerial threshold for consultancy services is ZMK 7 billion. Members may wish to note again that the MoU was signed on 22 December 2008 after the new procurement Act came into effect."
Siliya stated that the Ministry of Communications and Transport was under pressure to save Zamtel from collapsing.
"'I wish to repeat that in this process, time is of the greatest essence so that we do not continue to subsidise Zamtel at the expense of the citizens. We are all aware that mobile costs in Zambia are some of the highest in the region due to Zamtel's monopoly of the International Gateway and its inefficiencies. This has a direct bearing on the cost of doing business in general and the cost of communication in particular in Zambia," Siliya said.
"It must be noted that, government could not enter into any commercial agreements with the companies that were expressing interest because of inadequate information on the correct market value of Zamtel, information which I needed as the responsible minister to take to Cabinet to seek formal approval to actually partially privatise Zamtel.
"According to the ZDA Act No. 11 of 2006, ZDA would oversee all the aspects of the implementation of privatisation programme hence the reason they are party to the technical committee and the MoU."
She also revealed that the government signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with RP Capital Group after the advice of the Solicitor General.
"I wish to inform the House that the process of privatisation of Zamtel through an MoU is not a legally binding document but only expresses the intention of the parties. The second phase involves the actual sale, which would be only upon Cabinet approval. It is after this that a legally binding instrument would be entered into," Siliya said.
"I wish to inform this House that it was after the advice of the Solicitor General who dealt with issues pertaining to the MoU that we went ahead to sign the MoU on 22nd December 2008 taking into account all concerns raised.
"This MoU included an addendum on terms of reference on the role of ZDA as provided for in the ZDA Act. I wish to emphasise that ZDA is party to the MoU. The House may wish to note that it is the practice within government to enter into MoUs and this one is certainly not the first one in the Ministry of Communication and Transport. The Attorney General thereafter provided guidance on an agreement that would be signed in the event that Cabinet approved the partial sale of Zamtel. This advice has not been ignored and will be taken into account at the appropriate time."
When asked by Mukanga on how many Zambian companies were approached to value Zamtel assets, Siliya said no other company approached the Ministry of Communications and Transport other than those that wanted to buy off government shares in the company.
"...Other companies wanted to get a licence for a fourth mobile service provider, and one of them is Mr Fred M'membe himself. The majority of the companies, except for one wanted to buy the shares outrightly, but we could not proceed with the sale before knowing the true value of the company's assets. Zamtel also owes ZTE Corporation a total of US$46 million for the equipment the company has been supplying to Zamtel. In fact some individuals had even offered me money so that they could buy Zamtel but I refused," Siliya said.
She cautioned Parliament against dwelling on issues coming from the media, saying media stories that relied on leaked unauthenticated documents and half truths were a danger to stability and national security.
"It is dangerous if the agenda of this House is provided for by the media. Government is a true believer in press freedom but we also believe that the media must be responsible and practice self regulation. This self regulation must take into account our peculiar culture and norms as Zambians and our social and economic development needs. In this regard a responsible media can play an important role in uplifting the wellbeing of our people and reduce poverty," Siliya said.
"This government also believes in the fight against corruption and we are ready and committed to interact with all individuals and institutions including the media to rid our society of this scourge. Therefore, media stories that rely on leaked unauthenticated documents and half truths are a danger to stability and national security."
Siliya's mention of Post Editor Fred M'membe attracted mummers from the Executive side and part of the opposition.
When Sinazongwe UPND member of parliament Raphael Muyanda was given a chance to ask his question he ended up asking two questions as follows:
"The minister has disclosed to this House that some people wanted to pay her for them to buy government shares in Zamtel, and this is tantamount to corruption. Can the minister disclose the corruptor? Mr M'membe has proved to this nation that he is a highly dangerous criminal..."
At this point deputy speaker of the National Assembly Mutale Nalumango curtailed Muyanda's comments, saying the House could not debate people who were not present to defend themselves.
Nalumango further advised Muyanda that it was only the law enforcement agencies that could deal with court matters.
However, Muyanda could not rest until he raised a similar question: "May I know why Mr M'membe had this defrauding intention?"
He was again cautioned by Nalumango not to discuss people who could not defend themselves in Parliament.
When asked by Mufulira PF member of parliament Majorie Masiye on whether she would admit that government was responsible for the problems in Zamtel because it owed the company a lot of money, Siliya admitted but said the two parties were consulting frequently.
"In fact the two parties are always consulting because Zamtel also owes government huge sums of money in taxes and we have helped the company a lot. In any case the point has been taken," Siliya responded.
UPND member of parliament Brian Ntundu expressed doubt on the truthfulness of Siliya's statement, saying she had not exonerated herself.
"May I ask the honourable minister to come again with a clear statement because for now it is difficult to believe who is telling the truth between the media and the minister. I therefore request that the minister comes back to this House with a more clear statement on the matter," Ntundu said.
But deputy speaker Mutale Nalumango overruled the request, saying the minister could not be compelled to issue a ministerial statement by another member of the House.
Siliya signed an MoU with RP Capital Partners Limited over the partial privatisation of Zamtel shares in total disregard of legal advice from the Attorney General's office.
Attorney General Mumba Malila strongly criticised Siliya over her decision to disregard the advice from the Solicitor General and award RP Capital of Cayman Islands a US$2 million contract to value Zamtel.
But President Rupiah Banda said Siliya should be given a chance to find a strategic partner in Zamtel and that she should be congratulated for doing a commendable job.
Labels: CORRUPTION, DORA SILIYA, FRED M'MEMBE, PRIVATISATION, RAPHAEL MUYANDA, RP CAPITAL PARTNERS, THE POST, YAMFWA MUKANGA
Read more...
NCC has failed to address reduction of presidential powers, charges Sata
Written by Patson Chilemba and Masuzyo Chakwe
Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:51:25 PM
PATRIOTIC Front (PF) president Michael Sata yesterday charged that the National Constitution Conference (NCC) delegates have failed to address the reduction of presidential powers because they fear President Rupiah Banda.In an interview, Sata said NCC delegates were scared of debating issues that would irritate President Banda because they wanted to chew more from the conference.
"The reason why NCC cannot discuss the reduction of powers is because they know that Rupiah Banda will cancel the NCC. They want to eat more because they say the President is the one who can dissolve NCC. They will be saying things which can make him happy such as ‘the President can declare war without seeing Parliament'," Sata said.
"They are just wasting time talking about useless things. Last time, they could not agree on the powers of Parliament or a referendum."
And Lusaka lawyer Dr Rodger Chongwe said important issues such as the reduction of presidential powers should be discussed.
"Maybe NCC is happy with these powers," he said.
Dr Chongwe argued that the President should have no power to nominate people to Parliament. He said the Zambian people should elect people they wanted to represent them in Parliament.
"I don't know if it's the reporting or the committees of NCC, but the public, I'm one of the public, we don't seem to be getting full information about what is happening at NCC," Dr Chongwe said.
And Southern Africa Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (SACCORD) executive director Lee Habasonda expressed disappointment with the partisan manner in which delegates sitting on the NCC debated the proposed constitution.
Habasonda stated that civil society's fears that a constitution that may not stand the test of time could come out from the conference might as well be confirmed.
"The denial of economic and social rights by the ruling party on fears of legal action in case of failure to provide basic necessities is purely based on MMD's own assessment of its capacity," he stated.
Habasonda stated that the constitution was not about a party's capacity nor was the implementation of the rights in question contingent on the resources available at a particular time.
He stated that these rights were a recognition that the survival of any human being required minimum standards.
Habasonda stated that if a government was unable or could not guarantee the provision of minimum standards, it was SACCORD's considered view that such a government did not have a moral right to stay in power.
"The courts of law are not the only enforcers of rights. They are but just an option to be considered only when all else has failed. The primary enforcers of economic and social rights are elected officials and the government who should be lobbied by citizens," it stated.
He stated that SACCORD was disappointed that some delegates were insisting on clauses that provide them with an opportunity to change the balance of power.
Habasonda stated that the insistence to go for elections after the death of a sitting President within 90 days was motivated by the chance it offers to those outside government.
"Such selfish motivations should be exposed, discarded and instead replaced with the best interest of the whole country. We therefore urge delegates to adopt the proposal that the Vice-President assumes the reins of power in case the incumbent is unable to do so for whatever reason and completes the term," he stated.
Habasonda noted that this has been a practice for many years in such developed democracies as the United States where even the Senate seats that fall vacant were not filled by going for another election but instead the Governor of the State in question appoints a replacement.
He stated that additional advantage in the case of Zambia for adopting such a position was that it responds to popular calls for saving the country's resources needed for investment in the improvement of the living standards of the country's majority poor.
"In view of the critical nature of the process of constitutional making, we wish to register our displeasure at the quality of debate displayed by some delegates. To dismiss a submission, for instance on the need for a running mate, on fears of superstition or witchcraft is indeed lowering the level of engagement," stated Habasonda. "If the investment in the process is to be worthwhile, we urge the delegates to show seriousness and raise the level of debate."
Labels: CONSTITUTION, LEE HABASONDE, NCC, PRESIDENCY, SATA
Read more...
Most African farmers use recycled seeds, says Chituwo
Written by Edwin Mbulo in Livingstone
Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:44:32 PM
AGRICULTURE minister Dr Brian Chituwo has said most farmersin Africa use recycled and untested seeds. And International Conservation Union (ICUN) Invasive species coordinator Geoffrey Howard said the ministry of agriculture needs to intensify public awareness that growing invasive plants is a crime.
During the official opening of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) seminar in Livingstone yesterday, Dr Chituwo said information on high quality seed availability in African nations indicated a mixed pattern.
"However, the situation that is obtaining in much of our continent is that high quality seed is not readily available to many of our farmers. Most farmers use recycled and untested seed resulting in poor crop yield, leading to food insecurity," he said.
"This situation is worrisome and requires special attention by all nations. I believe that African nations can share high quality seeds through movements of seed from surplus to deficit countries.”
He added that there was little seed trade among African countries.
"There may be a number of many factors responsible for this unfortunate situation. Prominent among these is the existence of different seed policies, seed laws, regulations and seed testing methods. This should be looked at critically with a view to harmonising the seed policies across boundaries,î he said.
He however noted that the Eastern and Southern African countries had reached advanced stages in harmonising the process of seed laws and regulations.
"Harmonised seed testing methods in line with ISTA should also be encouraged across Africa. This will go a long way in facilitating seed trade on the continent and beyond,” he said.
Dr Chituwo said Africa needed more in seed testing in order to provide high quality, superior, high yielding crop varieties.
And Howard said the invasive weed Lantana Camara was a banned plant in Zambia and that people could be prosecuted for planting it.
"Lantana Camara is a banned plant and people can be prosecuted for planting or cultivating it. There are laws under the Ministry of Agriculture that state that this invasive plant cannot be cultivated,” he said.
He appealed to the Ministry of Agriculture to use the press and educate people on the legal implications of planting or cultivating the Lantana under the Weed Act of 1948.
"There are many hedges planted by people in Livingstone and other parts of the country. We need to do more awareness programmes in a better way than alarming them," said Howard.
Labels: AGRICULTURE, BRIAN CHITUWO, ISTA, SEED
Read more...
Nyirongo goes in 4 years
Written by Maluba Jere
Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:40:58 PM
FORMER lands minister Reverend Gladys Nyirongo has been sentenced to four years simple imprisonment after the magistrates court found her guilty of abuse of authority of office.Principal Resident Magistrate Sharon Kaunda Newa sentenced Rev Nyirongo after establishing that she did abuse her authority of office.
This was in a case where Rev Nyirongo stood charged with two counts of abuse of authority of office contrary to the Laws of Zambia.
Particulars of the offence were that Rev Nyirongo on a date unknown but between January 12, 2006 and February 22, 2007 in Lusaka, being a person employed in the public service as minister of lands directed Daisy Mulenga M'soka, a lands officer at the Ministry of Lands to generate offer letters of land in Foxdale area.
The letters of offer were given to Walinase Nyirongo, Janet Isaac Nyirongo, Peter Kapolya, Peter Ngulube, Precious Ndhlovu, Doris Mulenga, Mubanga Muyunji, Mickey Mukubu, Mwelwa Kamfwa, Bruce Chipasha and Dingwall Hayden in contravention of land alienation procedures, an act prejudicial to the interests of the government of the Republic of Zambia.
On the second count, Rev Nyirongo on unknown dates but between October 2006 and April 24, 2007 in Lusaka abused her position by directing Christopher Chewe, a junior technical officer in the Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, to subdivide Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines Farm F/309a in property No.L/19634/M for her and that she obtained property for herself.
The state called 24 witnesses while the defence team called five witnesses, including the accused.
Magistrate Newa said she had considered the evidence before court and that it was a fact that Rev Nyirongo did direct Daisy Mulenga to generate letters of offer for the persons in question adding that she directly breached the Cabinet handbook.
She said the action by Rev Nyirongo amounted to abuse of authority of office, an act which was prejudicial to the interest of the government of Zambia as the Commissioner of Lands was the only person empowered to alienate land on behalf of the Republican President.
Magistrate Newa noted that the prosecution had proved the case beyond all reasonable doubt and that she found the accused person guilty and convicted her accordingly.
On the second count, Magistrate Newa said she had heard the accused person's explanation that she had no interest in the said land but that it was not reasonable.
She said being minister of lands, Rev Nyirongo had no authority to alienate land as that authority was rested in the Commissioner of Lands.
Magistrate Newa said the prosecution had proved the case beyond reasonable doubt and that she found Rev Nyirongo guilty as charged and convicted her accordingly.
But in mitigation, Rev Nyirongo's lawyer Robson Malipenga asked the court to exercise leniency, saying his client was the first offender.
Malipenga said Rev Nyirongo was a family person, a sole bread winner for a big family which consists of biological and orphaned children whom he said entirely depended on her for their survival, food and education.
Malipenga also asked the court to be lenient with Rev Nyirongo, saying she was a member of parliament representing the people of Bwacha Constituency in Kabwe in the National Assembly as well as contributing to the well being of the citizens of the country.
"Further Your Honour, she is a Reverend who has been guiding many people and leading so many people to know God," he said. "Your honour, she is a member of the NCC [National Constitutional Conference] which is a body where she is participating in the constitution making process and the well being of this great country."
Malipenga further told the court that his client's contribution to the country had been immense considering the many portfolios she had held.
He explained that for the past years that the matter had been going on, Rev Nyirongo's conduct both inside and outside the court had been exemplary.
Malipenga also said despite the burden of the matter being dramatic, his client had carried the burden with tears of hurt, saying that alone was punishment in itself.
He asked the court to consider the circumstances of the matter saying she deserved leniency.
Malipenga noted that the guilty pronunciation by Magistrate Newa was enough embarrassment, which he said was equally punishment.
He further asked the court to consider Rev Nyirongo's age adding that she deserved a non-custodial sentence.
"Further Your Honour, she is equally not in good health. She may appear from the outside to be in good health but she is not," Malipenga said. "I urge this honorable court to consider exercising its powers through the discretion in meting out the sentence. We pray that the court considers a non-custodial sentence but suspended."
In passing judgment, Magistrate Newa said she had considered the mitigation by the accused person and that being the first offender, she deserved leniency from the court.
However, she noted that being a public figure, Rev Nyirongo was supposed to have used her office to build or strengthen the Ministry of Lands and not direct officers at her will, saying this could result in anarchy and total disregard of the law and procedure.
"The nation looks up to leaders for development as the country and where leaders fail to provide that leadership no matter the situation, it should not be condoned as it breeds corruption," Magistrate Newa said. "Thus the convict should be used as an example to others and in that way, the people who put them in office will be protected and inspire confidence in the system. I therefore find that this is a case that should be considered as a warning to all public officers. I therefore sentence the convict person to, in count one to 24 months simple imprisonment with immediate effect."
On the second count, Magistrate Newa sentenced Rev Nyirongo to 24 months simple imprisonment with immediate effect.
Magistrate Newa said the sentences would run concurrently.
Meanwhile, Rev Nyirongo's relatives wept as she was being taken to the holding cell at the Lusaka Magistrates Court Complex.
Labels: CORRUPTION, COURTS, GLADYS NYIRONGO, PRISONS
Read more...
PF MPs fight at Parliament
Written by Ernest Chanda and Agness Changala
Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:35:15 PM
PATRIOTIC Front (PF) members of parliament for Munali and Kawambwa, Mumbi Phiri and Elizabeth Chitika-Mulobeka respectively yesterday physically fought at Parliament Building in Lusaka following a tiff in the House. And Phiri was found at University Teaching Hospital (UTH) undergoing medical check up at the casualty because she sustained bruises and bites on her body.
Phiri and Mulobeka exchanged blows around 11:00 hours on the right hand corridor of the Parliament main entrance, about four metres from the side entrance in the presence of onlooking security personnel and members of parliament.
Parliamentary security personnel struggled to pacify the situation and only managed to stop the fight after about three minutes of fierce exchange of blows between the two female parliamentarians. [:) - MrK]
After the fight, the author picked Phiri’s shoes and a red handbag, and gave them to the security personnel who later handed the items to the parliamentarian.
Mulobeka had her outfit stripped around the neck and below the knee, while Phiri complained of scratches on the back.
After being separated, the two parliamentarians still hurled insults at each other, with Mulobeka saying: “ndekepaya aka, kalenseting’a sana [I will kill her she is tempting me a lot],” while Phiri shouted: “You bi****! I don’t know why this woman hates me.”
The two parliamentarians were then whisked away in different directions by parliamentary security officers.
And according to a source at Parliament Building, the two parliamentarians’ differences started from the chamber over a question that Phiri asked communications minister Dora Siliya after the latter presented her ministerial statement on the status of ZAMTEL.
Phiri wanted to know whether the government would make sure former Zambian Airways employees would not be paid one ngwee each as terminal benefits, just as former Zambia Airways employees were paid one dollar each 15 years ago.
Mumbi first declared interest in the question saying her spouse had been an employee of Zambia Airways and she had seen how much he suffered.
According to the source, Mulobeka allegedly made offensive comments towards Phiri.
It was at this point that Phiri got offended and left the House crying.
Mulobeka later waylaid Phiri and the fight ensued.
However, another source said the rivalry between the two had been there since Mulobeka and others decided to sit on the National Constitutional Conference (NCC).
The source said the situation was worsened when the Supreme Court deferred ruling in the appeal case involving expelled PF members of parliament.
The source said after the deferment, the expelled PF parliamentarians bragged that they were untouchable and that changed the mood between them and their counterparts.
And later in the day, Phiri underwent medical check up at the UTH because she sustained bruises and bites on her body.
The visibly shocked and annoyed Phiri said she could not even recall what led to her being bitten and scratched.
Phiri complained that Mulobeka had even torn her expensive suit, which she wore at the time of the attack.
She said after she was bitten and scratched Chipangali MMD member of parliament Vincent Mwale drove her in his vehicle to Kabulonga where she managed to obtain a police report from Kabulonga Police Post before she was taken to UTH to undergo medical tests.
Phiri demanded that both herself and Mulobeka undergo HIV test because she knew both her status and Mulobeka’s.
She said she would not be at peace because she had been bitten and scratched with nails.
Phiri said she was very disappointed with Mulobeka’s actions and wondered what happened to those outside Parliament if a person like her could be subjected to that treatment.
“If I can be beaten in Parliament, how about a person like you and the others. I demand for an HIV test to be carried for the sake of my safety and my marriage,” Phiri said while shedding tears.
Phiri said Mulobeka had the nerve to do what she did because she was a ‘rebel’ PF parliamentarian who did not represent anyone in Parliament.
She said the battle had just started and that she would not rest until the law took its course.
“I want justice to prevail and if it means taking the law in my own hands, it will just be so,” she said.
Phiri said Mulobeka also scratched Kanchibiya PF member of parliament Davies Mwango as he was trying to stop the fight.
Mwango who came to UTH to pick up Phiri said he could not comment on the matter.
When contacted for comment, Mulobeka laughed before calling Phiri a stupid and mad girl.
She said she could not say much as Parliament was handling the case.
“That girl is mad! She is very stupid and I won’t say much because the case is now in Parliament,” said Mulobeka.
Police spokesperson Bonny Kapeso confirmed receiving the report of the case involving Phiri and Mulobeka.
Kapeso said police had since opened a file of inquiry.
“Since matters of Parliament are handled by the Speaker, as police we have just opened a file of inquiry for keeping the records,” said Kapeso.
Labels: CATFIGHT, MPs, PARLIAMENT, PF
Read more...
Gladys Nyirongo sent to jail for corruption
February 14, 2009
Mrs Gladys Nyirongo, as Guest of Honour at Kaniki Bible College when she was minister.Sitting to the right with a big smile is the husband Pastor Jim Nyirongo
Former Lands Minister, Gladys Nyirongo, has been sentenced to four years imprisonment with hard labour for corruption.
Lusaka Magistrates, Sharon Newa, sentenced Nyirongo, 51, of house number 10 Chavuma drive, Highridge in Kabwe to two years imprisonment with hard labour in the first count and four years in the second count.
Nyirongo was charged with two counts of abuse of authority while in office contrary to Section 99(1) of the Penal Code Chapter 87 of the laws of Zambia.
In the first account it was alleged that on dates unknown but between January 1, 2006 and February 2007, Nyirongo, who was employed in the public service as Minister of Lands abused her position when she directed a Ministry of Lands officer Daisy Mulenga Msoka to generate offer letters in the Foxdale to selected individuals.
The court ruled that Nyirongo contravened land alienation procedures when she offered land to Walinase Nyirongo, Janet Isaac Nyirongo, Peter Kapolyo, Peter Ngulube and Precious Ndhlovu. Other beneficiaries were Doris Mulenga Mubanga Nuyunji, Mickey Mukubu, Mwelwa Kamfwa, Bruce Chipasha and Dingwall Hayden.
In the second count, Nyirongo, whilst serving as Lands Minister, abused her authority when she directed junior technical officer in the ministry of agriculture and cooperatives to sub-divide Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines Farm No. F/309a to create property No. L/1934/M for herself.
ZANIS/ENDS/SJK
Labels: COURTS, GLADYS NYIRONGO
Read more...
President Banda foreign missions key,RB
February 14, 2009
President, Rupiah Banda, says government will make effective use of foreign missions abroad to strengthen bilateral relations with other countries in view of the immense challenges resulting from the current global economic recession.
President Banda has since advised Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kabinga Pande, to ensure full utilisation of the existing ‘open-door policy’ in efforts of strengthening bilateral ties for the economic benefit of the country.
“We are in the midst of a world financial melt-down which has not spared developed and developing countries, therefore I appeal to you Excellencies to continue supporting Zambia and working closely with my government to addressing the adverse effects of melt-down on our people,” President Banda said.
He said the ministry of foreign affairs should double its efforts in creating a platform for enhanced interaction of diplomats with the government to help address challenges affecting national economic development.
The President was speaking at State House today at a private reception organised for heads of foreign missions in Zambia.
“I implore the Minister of Foreign Affairs and his team to double their efforts in making sure that Ambassadors and High Commissioners accredited were not hampered but interact freely with relevant wings of government,” he said.
” Your Excellencies, you will recall that during my budget speech to parliament last month, my administration spelt out what we intend to achieve during my tenure of office and my government appreciates that we cannot achieve all the set goals without your support hence my government attaches great importance with other countries,” he said.
He appealed to Ambassadors and High Commissioners accredited to Zambia to partner with government in efforts of reducing the negative effects of the global economic crunch on the Zambian economy.
President Banda said his government appreciates the support from cooperating partners in efforts of achieving economic growth through enhanced investment and trade.
In a vote of thanks, Dean of Diplomatic Corps Khalifa O’mar Swiexi commended President Banda for showing commitment to further strengthen Zambia’s relations with other countries.
Mr. Swiexi, who is also Libyan Ambassador to Zambia, expressed confidence that President Banda would use his vast experience in diplomacy to better the Zambia’s bilateral ties for the economic benefit of the people.
Foreign Affairs Minister, Kabinga Pande, said plans are underway by the Zambian government to open more missions abroad.
He said strengthening bilateral ties can be achieved if the Ministry of Foreign Affairs doubles its efforts in making sure that diplomatics interact freely with wings of government by way of easing barriers that impede the progression of the economy of Zambia.
Mr. Banda implored the Minister of Foreign Affairs Kabinga Pande to make sure that government removes barriers that may hinder the fully utilisation of strengthening interactions between Zambia and other countries.
He said government appreciated the support of the corporating partners to achieve the intended goals so that Zambia becomes a safe region and a better place to for conducting trade and attracting investment opportunities.
He noted that Zambia enjoys warm and cordial relationship with other countries hence Zambia’s call to strengthening her ties abroad.
President Banda further called for increased co-operation between Zambia and other countries adding that government attaches great importance with other countries.
ZANIS/KC/ENDS/SJK..
Labels: RUPIAH BANDA
Read more...
Dora is lying
Written by Editor
Government leaders are expected to tell the truth all the time. However difficult things might be, it is better to tell the truth or shut up instead of entangling oneself in a web of deceit.
It looks like no one has told Dora Siliya the saying about what a tangled web one weaves when they decide to deceive. It is easy to sound coherent and intelligent when telling lies. The coherence and intelligence cannot last because lies cannot defeat truth.
Dora’s ministerial statement in Parliament yesterday proves that all is not well at the Ministry of Communications and Transport. Dora has decided to defend her wrongs with half-truths and blatant lies.
We are not surprised because this is what arrogance does. It fools people into thinking that they are the best or the most intelligent and the rest of the people around are stupid and dull, and not able to see through their evil schemes.
Government exists to serve the people and not the other way round. Government officers are required to be accountable and transparent in all their dealings on behalf of the people. This is the standard that we expect Dora to achieve.
Last week in Parliament, Dora was asked to explain how RP Capital of Cayman Island were engaged for US $2 million to provide valuation services for Zamtel. This question arose after we had exposed the fact that Dora had signed an agreement with RP Capital in disregard of legal advice from the Attorney General’s chambers and tender procedures.
This is the issue that the nation wants to know about. No amount of sophistry and obfuscation will help Dora. She simply needs to answer the question. To try and link the editor of this newspaper to the engagement of RP Capital is simply stupid – it is dishonest and meant to hoodwink the people. If Dora is convinced that The Post has anything to do with her criminal disregard of government tender processes, let her say it as a private citizen and not hide behind the immunity that Parliament affords her.
We say what we say without hiding behind any privilege or immunity. We believe that Dora is engaged in criminal abuse of office in her conduct regarding Zamtel.
Does she think that the Zambian people are fools and cannot see her lies? To say that she single-sourced RP Capital because they are the only ones who expressed an interest to value Zamtel is simply stupid. By the way, the word stupid is not an insult. It simply means “showing a lack of thought or a lack of good judgement”, both of which definitions are true in relation to Dora.
She is talking as though she were talking to children. If, as Dora suggests, RP Capital were the only ones who expressed an interest to value Zamtel, when did government invite expressions of interest for companies to value Zamtel? How did RP Capital just wake up in England and decide that Zamtel in Zambia needed valuation?
Indeed, to obfuscate her criminal abuse of office, Dora led Parliament to believe that the other companies that showed interest in Zamtel wanted to buy its assets without valuing them. And in this connection, she said the editor of this newspaper had expressed an interest in the fourth mobile licence.
How Dora managed to link the fourth mobile licence advertised by the Communications Authority of Zambia in national newspapers on February 1, 2008 and the problems she has with her abuse of office in signing a contract contrary to the Attorney General’s advice and tender procedures is beyond belief and shows her criminal intent.
The fourth mobile licence was advertised publicly and Postlink, a company owned by Post Newspapers Limited, applied for it because it complimented its Internet provision business. The Communications Authority of Zambia stopped the process of awarding the fourth mobile licence after Mr Enoch Kavindele sued to enforce an award made earlier to Vodacom Zambia, a company he controlled.
For Dora to suggest that the fourth mobile license has anything to do with the privatisation of Zamtel is stupid, dishonest and unbelievable. To suggest that Fred M’membe applied for a cellular licence is to deliberately tell lies and mislead Parliament in order to avoid answering questions for her abuse of office. Dora has gotten used to telling lies and getting away with it. Let her tell Parliament the truth about the fourth mobile licence and show how relevant it is to RP Capital. When people are caught pants down, they start clutching at straws. And this is what Dora is doing.
Instead of dealing with her disregard for the Attorney General’s advice, she wants to blame The Post and its editor for her criminal conduct.
We know that Zambia has many problems that require solutions from the government. But this should not allow anyone to ignore the law. Procurement frauds are a very common form of corruption, which is why we have the Zambia National Tender Board to bring some sanity to what would otherwise be a feast for vultures.
However, it seems Dora has decided that when it suits her, she can ignore any law or tender process. Yesterday, she told Parliament that she did not ignore the Attorney General’s advice. What she did not do is explain to Parliament how she followed the Attorney General’s advice. Anyone reading the Attorney General’s advice will agree that it was meant to protect public resources and ensure the respect for the rule of law. Only a criminally-minded person will ignore legal advice from the Attorney General.
What benefit will a normal person get from ignoring the Attorney General? Why would a government minister not respect such sound legal advice?
It is clear from the Attorney General’s letter of January 5, 2009 that Dora had ignored the Attorney General’s advice in the letter dated November 21, 2008 and December 5, 2008 which was written by the Solicitor General. Is Dora now telling the nation that after being given this written legal advice, the Solicitor General gave her verbal or written authorisation to ignore the legal advice contained in his letter?
Is Dora so stupid as to believe that the Solicitor General can allow her to disregard the law? She has not begun to explain who RP Capital are, where they came from, who their local agents were. Why is Dora not explaining the role that President Rupiah Banda’s son Henry played?
Now Dora tells us that she has got the power to single-source up to K7 billion. We would like to see the law that allows ministers to overrule their ministries’ tender committees and single-source contracts up to K7 billion. This is madness!
Dora tells us that she can do K7 billion alone. Even if that were the case, the RP Capital contract is a minimum of K10 billion. She is also saying that this money is not yet paid and so there is no problem. What nonsense! She has signed a contract to pay K10 billion. Where does she draw that authority?
To say that she has merely entered a memorandum of understanding (MoU) and not an agreement further proves her stupidity. She has agreed to pay K10 billion and these RP Capital have already come. How can she say there is no agreement when the MoU came into force on December 22, 2008? As the Attorney General’s chambers observed, the MoU even contains dispute resolution mechanisms. If it is not a binding contract, why would there be a dispute resolution mechanism?
These same RP Capital people are supposed to value and get paid US $2 million for the services, after which they should find a buyer and get paid five per cent of the purchase price.
Parliament should not allow itself to be hoodwinked. They should demand all the documents and read them for themselves, and not listen to Dora’s apocryphal accounts. She is lying!
For Dora to say that freedom of the press is the problem in this issue is further proof of her stupidity. The problem is not The Post. The problem is her abuse of office.
Dora Siliya’s arrogance will be her downfall.
Today, Dora could be hiding under Rupiah Banda’s wings but tomorrow she will be on her own to answer for her misdeeds.
And there is no need for her to start smearing other people with filth instead of explaining her misdeeds.
Labels: DORA SILIYA, PRIVATISATION
Read more...
Mtine links C/belt’s poor performance to exclusion of key govt ministries
Written by Mutuna Chanda in Kitwe
Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:38:54 AM
THE poor performance of Copperbelt’s Diversification Programme resulted from the exclusion of key government ministries such as agriculture, Kitwe district commissioner Mcdonald Mtine has observed.
And Consumer Unity and Trust Society-Africa Resource Centre (CUTS-ARC) projects assistant Patrick Chengo has said Zambia’s economic growth needs to be export-led for it to be sustained.
In an interview after a CUTS sensitisation workshop on the Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) in Kitwe on Wednesday, Mtine said the Copperbelt Diversification Programme was now a must.
“The market is here on the Copperbelt for anything that we can produce and this has now extended to the North Western Province and also to the (Democratic Republic) Congo,” Mtine said.
“Why the first phase of the Copperbelt diversification programme failed is because key government departments like agriculture were not taken on board initially. If they had, we would have moved by now.”
He said there were already success stories of agriculture-based production on the Copperbelt that needed a boost.
“When you look at the dairy products from the projects of Heifer International in Ndola and Luanshya, these are being spearheaded by women of different levels of education and has also embraced people living with disabilities,” said Mtine.
“So if they were encouraged, the Copperbelt would be a milk belt. We even have a market for small animals such as goats and pigs on the Copperbelt and in the DRC in Katanga Province where the population is more than the Copperbelt; and these can be developed with the help of our extension officers.”
And Chengo said owing to Zambia’s limited domestic market size and low purchasing power, its sustained economic growth needed to be underpinned by exports.
“Diversification is on our lips but it is not practical,” said Chengo. “We’re constantly saying ‘we need to add value’ but are our producers ready to add value? The challenge still remains with us.”
The EIF seeks to, among other things, improve the capacity of least developed countries to formulate, negotiate and implement trade policy to enable them fully integrate into the multilateral trading system and seize the available market opportunities.
The EIF is supported by six multilateral agencies – the International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Trade Centre (ITC), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), World Bank and World Trade Centre (WTO).
Labels: COPPERBELT PROVINCE, CUTS-ARC, ECONOMY, GOVERNANCE, MCDONALD MTINE
Read more...
Govt’s engagement of RP Capital in Zamtel sale not transparent – Zukas
Written by Patson Chilemba
Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:36:33 AM
VETERAN politician Simon Zukas yesterday said the engagement of RP Capital Partners of Cayman Islands by communications and transport minister Dora Siliya to value Zamtel’s assets is not transparent.
Commenting on the US $2 million contract awarded to RP Capital Partners Limited by Siliya without following procedure and disregarding the Attorney General's advice, Zukas said the nation should be told how the government arrived at awarding the contract to RP Capital.
"This deal lacks transparency. To remove the [Kashiwa] Bulaya taste, the public needs to be told the international experience of RP of Cayman on similar projects. How was the firm selected and payments established? Is it the right fee? How do we know whether it's going to be paid the right fee?" Zukas asked.
"Unless the firm's professional standing is adequate, the incoming partner into Zamtel will not accept the valuation of Zamtel assets."
On whether Zamtel should be partially privatised or not, Zukas said Zamtel needed a partner because it was not good enough in its current state.
Last month, Malila strongly criticised Siliya's decision to proceed to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with RP Capital Partners Limited over the partial privatisation of Zamtel shares in total disregard of legal advice from his office.
Malila in his letter dated January 5, 2009 to the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Communications and Transport advised that the MoU be nullified and that the necessary processes be followed.
But addressing the press before leaving for Tanzania on Monday, President Banda backed Siliya, arguing that she was on the right track regarding the partial privatisation of Zamtel.
According to the MoU, RP Capital had been single-sourced and contracted by the government to provide consultancy services to the government in connection with valuation of Zamtel for purposes of the potential sale of government shares in Zamtel, assistance in negotiations with prospective acquirers in conjunction with the government team and project management of the potential Zamtel sale process working with the Ministry of Communications and Transport and/or the Zambia Development Agency (ZDA), as the case may be.
The MoU further stated that the Zambian government shall pay RP a fee amounting to five [5] per cent of the negotiated amount and would get US $2 million [about K10.3 billion] as transaction fees at the end of the transaction.
The MoU stated that RP Capital partners Limited would be reimbursed the expenses it would incur in air tickets, accommodation charges, sundries, report production and communication charges.
Labels: CORRUPTION, DORA SILIYA, PRIVATISATION, RP CAPITAL PARTNERS, ZUKAS
Read more...
Life likely to be harder this year, says Prof Mwanalushi
Written by Mutuna Chanda in Kitwe
Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:32:31 AM
LIFE in Zambia is likely to be harder this year than it has been in the recent past, Caritas Zambia immediate past chairman Professor Muyunda Mwanalushi has said.
During a ZICA post-budget tax review workshop in Kitwe yesterday, Prof Mwanalushi said finance minister Dr Situmbeko Musokotwane's optimistic vision for Zambia in this year's national budget did not appear to be firmly grounded in the reality of what was happening in the global and domestic economic environments.
"Such optimism does not find support from what has actually happened," Prof Mwanalushi said. "For the years 2006 to 2008, GDP [Gross Domestic Product] growth averaged 6.1 per cent per annum, well below the required minimum growth rate of seven per cent. The minister envisages a growth rate of five per cent for 2009; well, well below seven per cent. First, the five per cent growth rate ignores the likely impact of the global economic downturn on our economy.
"Overall, the world economy is expected to grow by less than three per cent this year. Where will the five per cent for Zambia come from? Moreover, our external debt is steadily gathering momentum as is domestic debt. Domestic borrowing is expected to contribute seven per cent to this year's revenue. Domestic borrowing amounts to printing money, which will in turn fuel inflation. The projected 10 per cent inflation rate for 2009 is therefore unlikely to be attained. With high inflation all the basic necessities become unaffordable to the majority of the citisenry."
He criticised the budget as appearing not to have a strategy for job creation.
"With looming redundancies, the budget does not appear to have a strategy for job creation," he said.
"And so increased numbers of the jobless, increased electricity tariffs, high inflation, increased domestic and external debt, reduced disposable incomes...life in Zambia is likely to be harder this year than it has been in the recent past. The minister's vision therefore remains a mirage!"
He also proposed that Zambia considered linking inflation to the tax bands as opposed to just linking it to the tax-exempt threshold, as was the case in this year's budget.
"In our 2009 budget, such action is proposed for the threshold which is to be raised from K600,000 to K700,000," he said. "The increase of just 16.6 per cent matches almost exactly the annual inflation in 2008. It would, we suggest, have been appropriate to apply inflation linking also to the tax bands instead of raising each by a flat K100,000. If the principle of inflation linking was embraced as standard practice, much contention would be avoided and the system would become readily accepted by taxpayers as fair. Inflation linking is integral to fair taxation. It protects taxpayers against tax-creep through inflation. By the same principle, salaries and pensions also need protection against inflation which is enemy number one of saving and development."
Prof Mwanalushi further said the marginal increases to education and health were not likely to markedly improve services in the two social sectors.
"This year's allocation to education and health have marginally increased from 15.4 per cent and 11.5 pr cent in 2008 to 17.2 per cent and 11.9 per cent respectively; water and sanitation have been allocated 3.8 per cent of the budget," said Prof Mwanalushi.
"Meanwhile, general public services - the civil service bureaucracy - has been allocated almost a third of the total budget - 31.8 per cent. These marginal increases are not likely to significantly improve educational and health services; neither is there likely to be a significant increase in the percentage of the population with access to clean drinking water. So we will continue to see increased cases of malaria, high pupil-teacher ratios and lack of drugs in our hospitals and clinics."
Labels: ECONOMY, GREAT DEPRESSION II, MUYUNDA MWANALUSHI
Read more...
Munkombwe’s note to Teta strays in Parliament, tickles opposition
Written by Ernest Chanda
Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:27:27 AM
THERE was drama in Parliament on Thursday when Kantanshi member of parliament Yamfwa Mukanga raised a point of order on whether Southern Province minister Daniel Munkombwe was in order to propose two names of MMD cadres as board members of the Southern Water and Sewerage Company.
This was after Mukanga came across a note that Munkombwe had written to local government minister Benny Tetamashimba, informing him about the proposed names which Munkombwe had forwarded last year to then local government minister Sylvia Masebo.
As Mukanga read the contents of the note, the House burst into laughter with jeers and shouts of 'shame' from opposition members of parliament.
On the outside, the note read: 'Hon B. Tetamashimba MP.' And the contents read as follows: "Hon minister. Before your predecessor left the ministry, I had submitted 2 names for inclusion to the Southern Water and Sewerage board. The names are Mr Mwendapole of Livingstone and Mr Enock Kasonkomona of Choma. Do you have some information [on] these names because they are strong MMD. Y[our]s Daniel Munkombwe GCDS," read the note.
After reading the note, Mukanga laid it on the table of the House, but Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly Mutale Nalumango overruled the point of order, arguing that the note was not an official document.
Upon learning that the note had landed in wrong hands, the seemingly disappointed Munkombwe folded his arms and smiled as opposition members of parliament burst into laughter, while some MMD members of parliament including some Cabinet ministers defended Munkombwe as they shouted: "What is wrong with that?"
Labels: BENNY TETAMASHIMBA, DANIEL MUNKOMBWE, YAMFWA MUKANGA
Read more...
COMMENT - The minister is trying to 'create' a stimulus package by rewording existing policy. Who this is supposed to fool I don't know.
Govt has provided stimulus package, claims Mutati
Written by Chiwoyu Sinyangwe in Chirundu
Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:22:26 AM
COMMERCE minister Felix Mutati on Thursday claimed that the government has provided over K2.3 trillion as economic stimulus package for the country in this year’s budget.
Officiating at the opening of the Zanaco Plc branch in Chirundu, Mutati said the economic stimulus package was in line with initiatives being taken by some other countries to stimulate their economies in the wake of the current global financial crisis.
Mutati explained that while other countries were providing direct financing to stimulate their economies, Zambia’s package was entrenched in the incentives provided for in the national budget.
He said the stimulus package would cost the country in excess of K2 trillion.
“People are asking us; does your government put any economic stimulus package? The answer is yes,” said Mutati.
“The answer is yes. We have in the 2009 budget provided for tax rebates, tax relief in excess of K2 trillion. That in effect is our stimulus package. We have reduced Pay As You Earn (PAYE), by giving concessions to the mining sector so that they can continue to provide employment to our people. We are including the Multi Facility Economic Zones (MFEZ) in the incentives. This is all part of the economic stimulus packages. So, we are not sitting back but we are confronting the challenges and meeting them. “
And Zanaco managing director Mark Wiesssing said the opening of the 53rd branch at Chirundu was part of the bank’s aggressive expansion programme.
Wiesssing said the opening of the branch also allayed earlier fears that the bank would halt the expansion programme after it was taken over by Dutch financial giant, Rabobank Group.
He also disclosed that despite the current global economic predicament, Rabobank Group had continued to post very strong results for growth.
“As of last year, we have posted over 100 per cent profit before tax and K50 billion profit for the prior year. Our deposit base has grown to over K2.3 trillion making it the largest deposit base while shareholder equity stands at K250 billion which is way above the minimum requirement of the Bank of Zambia,” said Wiesssing.
Labels: FELIX MUTATI, GREAT DEPRESSION II, MARK WIESSING, RABOBANK
Read more...
British Airways to promote Zambia’s tourist destinations
Written by Joan Chirwa
Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:20:11 AM
BRITISH Airways has embarked on a campaign to promote touristdestinations in and around Zambia. “This promotion includes a once a week radio programme on Radio Phoenix called Travel Secrets, that promotes local destinations in Zambia and offers listeners the opportunity to share their travel experiences,” stated British Airways country commercial manager Chana Musakanya in a press release.
“Travellers should be able to make their travel experience a memorable one, both locally and internationally. British Airways is therefore proud to play a role in promoting tourism in Zambia. We strive to work with local providers to offer our passengers invaluable Zambian experiences.”
And commenting on the Innovation in Travel award that British Airways received last week, Musakanya said airline was proud to receive such recognition as it showed the appreciation from passengers of the premiere services being offered.
“British Airways in Zambia has now introduced an upgrade offer from the World Traveller Plus to Club world until the end of March 2009 on one sector of the journey,” stated Musakanya.
And during its Travel Secrets radio programme, British Airways voted Tongabezi Lodge, located on the banks of the Zambezi River near Victoria Falls in Livingstone, as the Valentine’s destination this year.
Last year, the lodge was awarded the World Travel Award as Zambia's leading Safari Lodge.
Labels: BRITISH AIRWAYS, RADIO PHOENIX, TOURISM
Read more...