Carter explains donors’ role in corruption fight
Written by Masuzyo Chakwe
Monday, April 06, 2009 3:28:54 PM
BRITISH High Commissioner to Zambia Tom Carter has said donor support to the fight against corruption does not in any way undermine the independence of the Judiciary in Zambia.
Commenting on the recent convictions of high profile persons in former president Frederick Chiluba and the late president Levy Mwanawasa's administrations, High Commissioner Carter said the British government supports the Zambian government's efforts to tackle corruption.
He said the recent convictions were an example of Zambia's commitment to the fight against corruption.
The Task Force on Corruption recently secured convictions of people such as former Zambia Air Force (ZAF) commanders Lieutenant General Sande Kayumba and Lieutenant General Christopher Singogo, former Zambia Army commander Lieutenant General Geojago Musengule and former president Frederick Chiluba's wife, Regina among others.
On Nchelenge National Democratic Front (NDF) member of parliament Ben Mwila's accusations that the Task Force on Corruption and some donor countries had hijacked the Zambian judicial system, High Commissioner Carter said the donor community respects the independence of the Judiciary.
High Commissioner Carter said the donor community's support did not in any way undermine the country's judicial processes.
Recently, Mwila said in Parliament that donors through the Task Force on Corruption had hijacked the judicial system and targeted certain individuals they did not like for prosecution.
Labels: CORRUPTION, DONORS, JIMMY CARTER
Read more...
Elders' visit: more questions than answer
Peter Chimutsa - Opinion
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:34:00 +0000
FORMER US President Jimmy Carter, former Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan and wife of former South African president Nelson Mandela and the widow of the late Mozambican president Samora Machel, Graça Machel, have indicated that they will visit Zimbabwe regardless of whether the Zimbabwean government extends an invitation or not.
This is an interesting development. Who invited these “high level diplomats” then, if not the government of Zimbabwe?
Maybe the three ‘delegates’ or Elders would care to tell us.
President Jimmy Carter who was born exactly the same year that President Mugabe was born (1924) and the two other delegates have nothing else to assess in Zimbabwe. All assessments have been carried out and reports written. We do not need any more academic work on Zimbabwe.
Perhaps someone out there would care to tell us when these “eminent persons” decide it was time to come to Zimbabwe and with whom they discussed that trip.
It is quite a strange coincidence that the trip is announced at the same time as MDC-T President’s visit to Europe seeking humanitarian assistance at the invitation of President Nicholas Sarkozy. Maybe this trip was hatched in the corridors of European institutions?
Foreigners, especially outside the African continent should realise that there is already a structured process taking place in Zimbabwe to assess the humanitarian needs and to seek a solution to the Zimbabwean problem and there is no value addition by sending these three individuals whose mandate is not clear anyway. What constituency do they represent? Where are they going to go? Who are they going to meet? Who will be responsible for their security in Zimbabwe, if not the Zimbabwean government?
Such arrogance by the “international community” should be resisted. Zimbabwe is not free-for-all.
President Carter is in no position to advise on the situation in Zimbabwe. Many of us still remember his funding of anti-Soviet, Afghan Islamist factions on from 1979 onwards. His termination of the Russian Wheat Deal led to loss of many livelihoods that depended on agriculture both in his own country and the then Soviet Union.
Carter prohibited American athletes from participating in the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow and heightened tension between the two countries and split the world into two camps.
Former secretary-general Kofi Annan could have done more for Zimbabwe and for the region during his tenure at the world body rather than now to avert the situation we find ourselves in. He condemned, rather than use his good offices to engage.
This visit attracts more questions than answers.
Labels: GRACA MACHEL, JIMMY CARTER, KOFI ANNAN
Read more...
